Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
286 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole Body Fluorine F 18 Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Scan and Whole Body MRI in Finding Bone Metastases in Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT00956163
18F-NaF-PET/MR vs 99mTc-MDP-SPECT/CT to Detect Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer Patients.
NCT02969564
18F-FCH (Fluorocholine)-PET/MR in Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer
NCT01993160
Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Patients With Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) With Microtubule Directed Chemo or AR-directed Therapy
NCT01516866
NaF PET/MRI Evaluation for Bone Metastases in Breast Cancer
NCT02103634
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The National Research Universal (NRU) reactor at Chalk River Laboratories (Ontario, Canada) was shut down unexpectedly in May 2009 following a leak of heavy water. The NRU reactor supplied approximately a third of the world's demand of 99Mo for 99Mo/99mTc generators used diagnostic nuclear medicine tests. Given the fragility of 99Mo supply, alternative radiopharmaceuticals, such as 18F-Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF), are attractive options to replace 99mTc bone scans. Several studies suggest that 18F-NaF may be more accurate and more sensitive in the detection of bone metastases than 99mTc bone scans.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
18F-NaF PET Imaging for Bone Scintigraphy
All participants will receive PET/CT Imaging using the investigational drug 18F-NaF and a 99mTc-medronate whole body bone scan with SPECT to compare the diagnostic ability of the two methods for the presence of bone metastases.
NaF PET/CT Imaging
Diagnostic imaging test that is considered investigational
99mTc-medronate whole body bone scan with SPECT
99mTc-medronate whole body bone scan with SPECT imaging. Note, that this is a standard procedure in this patient population and thus is not considered investigational.
18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF)
A single radioactive dose of 18F-NaF (185-370 MBq) is intravenously administered to subject 60 minutes prior to PET/CT imaging to evaluate whether or not subject has bone metastasis from advanced prostate or breast cancer. Entire procedure from injection to scan completion will take about 2.25 hours
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NaF PET/CT Imaging
Diagnostic imaging test that is considered investigational
99mTc-medronate whole body bone scan with SPECT
99mTc-medronate whole body bone scan with SPECT imaging. Note, that this is a standard procedure in this patient population and thus is not considered investigational.
18F-Sodium Fluoride (NaF)
A single radioactive dose of 18F-NaF (185-370 MBq) is intravenously administered to subject 60 minutes prior to PET/CT imaging to evaluate whether or not subject has bone metastasis from advanced prostate or breast cancer. Entire procedure from injection to scan completion will take about 2.25 hours
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects ≥ 18/19 years of age (depending on the age of majority in the province where the trial is conducted)
For Prostate Cancer:
Male subjects requiring a bone scan for evaluation of bone metastasis with one (or more) of the following criteria:
* Symptomatic subjects with clinically suspected bone metastases based on a history of non-joint skeletal pain or non-joint skeletal tenderness on physical examination. The physician must have a high index of suspicion based on history or physical examination, such as night time pain or new onset of pain unexplained by trauma. Such subjects must have a measurable PSA level ≥ 4 ng/mL.
* Subjects with findings on other examinations (such as plain x-ray, CT, MRI or bone scintigraphy and others) that are suspicious for bone metastases but not conclusively diagnostic of bone metastases.
* Asymptomatic subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer\[1\] and biopsy Gleason sum 8 -10 (e.g. scores 3+5, 5+3, 4+4, 4+5, 5+4 or 5+5) prior to treatment.
* Asymptomatic subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer\[1\] and biopsy Gleason score (4+3) and either PSA level ≥ 20 or palpable disease (cT2b or greater) prior to treatment.
* Asymptomatic subjects with newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer\[1\] with PSA level ≥ 20 and palpable disease (any cT2 or greater) prior to treatment.
* Asymptomatic subjects with a prior history of treated prostate cancer, and rising PSA, with a PSA doubling time \< 6 months, and a minimum PSA level ≥ 4 ng/mL
* Asymptomatic subjects with a prior history of treated prostate cancer, and rising PSA while under androgen deprivation therapy, with a clearly measurable PSA doubling time \< 6 months (treatment does not need to be discontinued for eligibility).
Notes:
For Breast Cancer:
Subjects (male or female) requiring a bone scan for evaluation of bone metastasis with one (or more) of the following criteria (19-23):
* Symptomatic subjects with clinically suspected bone metastases based on a history of non-joint skeletal pain or non-joint skeletal tenderness on physical examination. The physician must have a high index of suspicion based on history or physical examination, such as night time pain or new onset of pain unexplained by trauma.
* Subjects with findings on other examinations (such as plain x-ray, CT, MRI or bone scintigraphy and others) that are suspicious for bone metastases but not conclusively diagnostic of bone metastases.
* Asymptomatic subjects with newly diagnosed extra-skeletal metastatic breast cancer (stage IV).
* Asymptomatic subjects with elevated serum cancer antigen (CA) 15.3 or alkaline phosphatase and newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer (Stage III).
* Asymptomatic subjects with nodal or extra-skeletal metastatic relapse during follow-up after curative-intent therapy.
* Asymptomatic subjects with new elevation of CA 15.3 or alkaline phosphatase during follow-up after curative-intent therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to lie supine for the duration of the imaging studies.
* Subjects previously known for bone metastasis diagnosed by imaging or biopsy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
British Columbia Cancer Agency
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francois Benard, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Edmonton Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
QEII Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Hamilton Health Sciences Corp.
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fleurimont, Quebec, Canada
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Benard F, Harsini S, Wilson D, Zukotynski K, Abikhzer G, Turcotte E, Cossette M, Metser U, Romsa J, Martin M, Mar C, Saad F, Soucy JP, Eigl BJ, Black P, Krauze A, Burrell S, Nichol A, Tardif JC. Intra-individual comparison of 18F-sodium fluoride PET-CT and 99mTc bone scintigraphy with SPECT in patients with prostate cancer or breast cancer at high risk for skeletal metastases (MITNEC-A1): a multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1499-1507. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00642-8. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MITNEC-A1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.