Comparison of Incision Angle of Mediolateral Episiotomy at 40 and 60 Degrees
NCT ID: NCT01930721
Last Updated: 2013-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
330 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2013-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
incision angle of 60 degrees
episiotomy incision angle will be defined as 60 degree as measured before cutting.
episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 40 degree before cutting.
incision angle 40 degree episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be defined as 40 degree as measured before cutting.
episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 60 degrees.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 60 degrees.
episiotomy
incision angle of episiotomy will be 40 degree before cutting.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Gestational age \> 37 weeks
3. No instrumental delivery.
4. No fetal distress or any emergency
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inability to understand the informed consent.
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
malka amen
resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ADEL SH SLAH EL-DIN, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
LECTURER
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain Shams Unversity Hospitals
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
adel shafik, lecturer
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
El-Din AS, Kamal MM, Amin MA. Comparison between two incision angles of mediolateral episiotomy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jul;40(7):1877-82. doi: 10.1111/jog.12432.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
incision angle of mediolateral
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id