A Study Of PF-05212384 Plus Irinotecan Vs Cetuximab Plus Irinotecan In Patients With KRAS And NRAS Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01925274
Last Updated: 2019-01-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-15
2016-04-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rechallenge of Cetuximab Combined With Irinotecan as Third-line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer - Phase II Study
NCT02316496
Study of Tepotinib Combined With Cetuximab in Participants With Left-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (PERSPECTIVE)
NCT04515394
Study of Irinotecan and Cetuximab Versus Irinotecan as Second-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic, EGFR-Positive Colorectal Cancer
NCT00063141
Cetuximab Rechallenge in Irinotecan-pretreated mCRC, KRAS, NRAS and BRAF Wild-type Treated in 1st Line With Anti-EGFR Therapy (CRICKET).
NCT02296203
Safety and Efficacy Study of mFOLFOX-6 Plus Cetuximab for 8 Cycles Followed by mFOLFOX-6 Plus Cetuximab or Single Agent Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and WT KRAS Tumours
NCT01161316
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm A
PF-05212384 plus Irinotecan
PF-05212384
30 minute IV infusion of PF-05212384 on days 2, 9, 16 and 23 of each cycle. Intra-patient dose escalation will commence with 110mg and will increase depending on tolerability.
irinotecan
90 minutes IV infusion of irinotecan 180mg/m\^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle
Arm B
Cetuximab plus Irinotecan
Cetuximab
120 minute IV infusion of cetuximab 400mg/m\^2 on cycle 1 day 1; 60 minute IV infusion of cetuximab on days 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle, and on day 1 of each cycle after cycle 1
Irinotecan
90 minutes IV infusion of Irinotecan 180mg/m\^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PF-05212384
30 minute IV infusion of PF-05212384 on days 2, 9, 16 and 23 of each cycle. Intra-patient dose escalation will commence with 110mg and will increase depending on tolerability.
irinotecan
90 minutes IV infusion of irinotecan 180mg/m\^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle
Cetuximab
120 minute IV infusion of cetuximab 400mg/m\^2 on cycle 1 day 1; 60 minute IV infusion of cetuximab on days 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle, and on day 1 of each cycle after cycle 1
Irinotecan
90 minutes IV infusion of Irinotecan 180mg/m\^2 on days 1 and 15 of each cycle
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Progression following treatment for colorectal cancer with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine therapy in the metastatic setting.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group \[ECOG\] Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
* At least one measurable lesion by Response Evaluation Criterion in Solid Tumors \[RECIST\]
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior treatment with a PI3K, mTOR, AKT or EGFR inhibitor
* Patients who have discontinued treatment with prior irinotecan therapy due to toxicity.
* Prior radiation to the pelvis or abdomen
* Patients with history of interstitial lung disease.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pfizer
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Pfizer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
Bakersfield, California, United States
Drug Management Only: UCLA West Medical Pharmacy, Att: Steven L Wong, Pharm D
Los Angeles, California, United States
Drug Management Only: UCLA West Medical Pharmacy
Los Angeles, California, United States
UCLA West Medical Pharmacy
Los Angeles, California, United States
Regulatory Management Only: TRIO-US Central Administration
Los Angeles, California, United States
TRIO-US Central Administration (Regulatory Management only)
Los Angeles, California, United States
TRIO_US
Los Angeles, California, United States
West Valley Hematology/Oncology Med Group
Northridge, California, United States
Siteman Cancer Center - St Peters
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States
Siteman Cancer Center - West County
Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States
Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Siteman Cancer Center - South County
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Regulatory Office: Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Buffalo, New York, United States
Kadlec Clinic Hematology and Oncology
Kennewick, Washington, United States
Kadlec Medical Center
Richland, Washington, United States
Outpatient Imaging Center
Richland, Washington, United States
Medical Oncology Associates, PS
Spokane, Washington, United States
Spokane Valley Cancer Center
Spokane Valley, Washington, United States
Aichi cancer center central hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
National Cancer Center Hospital East
Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
National Cancer Center
Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital / Department of Internal Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013-002095-40
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
B2151005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.