Trial Outcomes & Findings for Detection of Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance Genes Using the Curetis Unyvero LRT55 Application (NCT NCT01922024)
NCT ID: NCT01922024
Last Updated: 2019-03-05
Results Overview
Sensitivity for microorganism detection will be determined against the respective reference method consisting of standard procedure and/or a reference method based on PCR and bi-directional sequencing using alternative primers. Sensitivity for non-atypical microorganism detection will thus be determined if at least 1 out of 2 reference methods have identified microorganisms that are covered by the panel of the investigational IVD. Results will further be analyzed against standard of-care alone, as well as against composite comparator. Sensitivity for atypical microorganism detection will be determined against PCR with alternative primers as reference method. Specificity for microorganism detection will be determined in all samples included in the trial. Individual specificities will be calculated for the detection of the respiratory microorganisms analyzed by the investigational IVD compared to the microorganisms reference method.
COMPLETED
2124 participants
Up to 12 months
2019-03-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Prospective Fresh Clinical Specimens
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against composite (comparator) which is based on routine clinical microbiology and a second PCR test
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
|
Retrospective Frozen Clinical Specimens
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against routine clinical microbiology
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1653
|
471
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1653
|
471
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Detection of Microorganisms and Antibiotic Resistance Genes Using the Curetis Unyvero LRT55 Application
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Prospective Fresh Clinical Specimens
n=1653 Participants
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against composite (comparator) which is based on routine clinical microbiology and a second PCR test
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
|
Retrospective Frozen Clinical Specimens
n=471 Participants
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against routine clinical microbiology
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
|
Total
n=2124 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
827 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
186 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1013 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
826 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
285 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1111 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
665 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
182 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
847 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
988 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
289 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1277 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
1653 participants
n=5 Participants
|
471 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2124 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsSensitivity for microorganism detection will be determined against the respective reference method consisting of standard procedure and/or a reference method based on PCR and bi-directional sequencing using alternative primers. Sensitivity for non-atypical microorganism detection will thus be determined if at least 1 out of 2 reference methods have identified microorganisms that are covered by the panel of the investigational IVD. Results will further be analyzed against standard of-care alone, as well as against composite comparator. Sensitivity for atypical microorganism detection will be determined against PCR with alternative primers as reference method. Specificity for microorganism detection will be determined in all samples included in the trial. Individual specificities will be calculated for the detection of the respiratory microorganisms analyzed by the investigational IVD compared to the microorganisms reference method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Prospective Fresh Clinical Specimens
n=1653 Participants
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against composite (comparator) which is based on routine clinical microbiology and a second PCR test
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
an overall weighted average sensitivity of 91.4% for detection of panel pathogens an overall weighted average specificity of 99.5% for detection of panel pathogens
an overall weighted average sensitivity of 89.9 % for detection of resistance markers an overall weighted average specificity of 99.3 % for detection of resistance markers
|
Retrospective Frozen Clinical Specimens
n=471 Participants
Patients with suspicion of lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia), samples tested with Unyvero LRT 55 cartridge and results compared against routine clinical microbiology
LRT55 Testing: Testing on the Unyvero LRT55
an overall weighted average sensitivity of 91.4% for detection of panel pathogens an overall weighted average specificity of 99.5% for detection of panel pathogens
an overall weighted average sensitivity of 89.9 % for detection of resistance markers an overall weighted average specificity of 99.3 % for detection of resistance markers
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity for Microorganism Detection as Compared to Routine Microbiology and Other Reference Methods Including PCR and Sequencing
Specificity - Resistance Marker Detection
|
99.3 Percentage
Interval 99.3 to 99.3
|
99.3 Percentage
Interval 99.3 to 99.3
|
|
Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity for Microorganism Detection as Compared to Routine Microbiology and Other Reference Methods Including PCR and Sequencing
Sensitivity - Pathogen Detection
|
91.4 Percentage
Interval 91.4 to 91.4
|
91.4 Percentage
Interval 91.4 to 91.4
|
|
Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity for Microorganism Detection as Compared to Routine Microbiology and Other Reference Methods Including PCR and Sequencing
Specificity- Pathogen Detection
|
99.5 Percentage
Interval 99.5 to 99.5
|
99.5 Percentage
Interval 99.5 to 99.5
|
|
Clinical Sensitivity and Specificity for Microorganism Detection as Compared to Routine Microbiology and Other Reference Methods Including PCR and Sequencing
Sensitivity - Restistance Marker Detection
|
89.9 Percentage
Interval 89.9 to 89.9
|
89.9 Percentage
Interval 89.9 to 89.9
|
Adverse Events
Prospective Fresh Clinical Specimens
Retrospective Frozen Clinical Specimens
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place