A Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CVVHDF) Using a Commercial Citrate-containing Replacement Fluid (Prismocitrate 18/0)

NCT ID: NCT01921816

Last Updated: 2014-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators aim to examine the efficacy and safety of using a new citrate containing commercially available solutions (Prismocitrate 18/0) as the regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, and continuous renal replacement therapy is the preferable mode of treatment to remove the metabolic waste while avoiding the hemodynamic instability associated with intermittent hemodialysis. Thrombosis frequently occurs in the hemofilter which could reduce the circuit lifespan, jeopardize the efficacy of renal replacement, result in loss of blood cells and increased transfusion requirement. Anticoagulants including conventional heparin and low molecular weight heparin, introduced via the arterial port of the circuit, are widely used to reduce clotting within the extracorporeal circuit. However, significant amount of heparin is not removed in the circuit and will be carried into patient's circulation, which could lead to bleeding complications. Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been used for intermittent haemodialysis since 1983, and its use has extended to that for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) since 1987. Citrate is introduced at therapeutic level at the arterial limb of the dialysis circuit, where it chelates calcium ions in the blood to prevent clotting within the hemofilter. While some calcium-citrate complex is removed in the filter, the residual will be circulated to the patient and be metabolized in liver. Patient's systemic ionized calcium level remains normal, by hemodilution and also calcium replacement. Therefore, the anticoagulant effect from citrate is regional and confined to the extracorporeal circuit. RCA has the potential to extend circuit life during renal replacement therapy without systemic anticoagulation. In a recent meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, RCA was as efficacious as heparin anticoagulation in term of maintaining circuit function, and RCA was associated with decreased risk of bleeding with no significant increase in incidence of metabolic alkalosis.(5) Hypocalcemia was more common in patients receiving citrate, but of note, no clinical adverse event was reported in the included studies. Although citrate anticoagulation had repeatedly been demonstrated to prolong filter life, many hospitals still refrained from using it, as a result of limited experience, different patient variety, or other reasons.

The investigators' group has performed a pilot study (HKU/HA HKW IRB No: UW 08-221) to assess the efficacy and safety of continuous venous-venous hemodiafiltration(CVVHDF) using a commercial citrate containing replacement fluid (Prismocitrate 10/2, Gambro) which contains 10mmol/l citrate and 2 mmol/l citric acid. 15 subjects were recruited from July 2008 to June 2011. No serious adverse events were reported, including severe hypocalcemia, hypercalcemia, citrate toxicity and severe acid base disturbances. Metabolic acidosis due to renal failure were only partially corrected by CRRT with citrate anticoagulation in the initial study subjects, the problem was subsequently solved by adding supplemental bicarbonate to the dialysate. Since then, all the patients were able to complete the treatment protocols with adequate kidney lifespan, correction of metabolic abnormalities and fluid imbalance. However, since additional bicarbonate is needed to correct the metabolic acidosis during CRRT, there is room for improvement regarding the formulation of the citrate-containing solution to reduce acid liberation while increasing the alkali bicarbonate production. Prismocitrate 18/0, which contains 18mmol/l citrate (one mmol citrate could be metabolized to produce 3 mmol bicarbonate) and no citric acid, could potentially result in better acid-base control during CRRT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prismocitrate 18/0

citrate-containing replacement solution (Prismocitrate 18/0, Gambro) will be administered at pre-filter port during continuous hemodiafiltration, for the purpose as replacement solution and anticoagulation

Group Type OTHER

Prismocitrate 18/0, Prism0cal

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects on continuous hemodiafiltration will ordinarily receive heparin as the anticoagulation. In our study, regional citrate anticoagulation with Prismacitrate is used to replace heparin. Citrate has been shown in study to be safer than heparin with reduced bleeding risk

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prismocitrate 18/0, Prism0cal

Subjects on continuous hemodiafiltration will ordinarily receive heparin as the anticoagulation. In our study, regional citrate anticoagulation with Prismacitrate is used to replace heparin. Citrate has been shown in study to be safer than heparin with reduced bleeding risk

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prismocitrate 18/0 (replacement solution), Prism0cal (dialysate), Gambro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient requires CRRT as treatment for renal failure, as decided by the attending physician
* The patient fulfils at least one of the following clinical criteria for initiating CRRT:

1. According to the RIFLE criteria, (11) patients satisfying the "injury" criteria (increase creatinine by 2 fold or urine output\<0.5ml/kg/hr for 12hr) will be considered for CRRT
2. Hyperkalemia (\[K+\] \> 6.5 mmol/L).
3. Severe acidemia (pH \< 7.2).
4. Urea \> 25 mmol/liter.
5. Clinically significant organ oedema in the setting of ARF.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lui Mei Sze

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Adult Intensive Care unit, Queen Mary Hospital

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Kellum JA, Bellomo R. Clinical review: anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy--heparin or citrate? Crit Care. 2011 Jan 24;15(1):202. doi: 10.1186/cc9358.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21345279 (View on PubMed)

Leung AK, Shum HP, Chan KC, Chan SC, Lai KY, Yan WW. A retrospective review of the use of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration for critically ill patients. Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:349512. doi: 10.1155/2013/349512. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23424680 (View on PubMed)

Shum HP, Chan KC, Yan WW. Regional citrate anticoagulation in predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration using prismocitrate 10/2 solution. Ther Apher Dial. 2012 Feb;16(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2011.01001.x. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22248200 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UW 12-173

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id