Platelet-Rich Plasma vs Corticosteroid Injection as Treatment for Degenerative Pathology of the Temporomandibular Joint
NCT ID: NCT01920373
Last Updated: 2015-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE1
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1.1 Osteoarthritis is a continuous and entirely physiologic adaptive process that occurs in every joint. These include the replication of cells that produce matrix, enzymes, protease inhibitors, cytokines, and other peptides. Along with the synthesis of new tissue there is a release of breakdown products into the synovial fluid. Enzymes and phagocytes are required to clear these breakdown products. Normal tissue turnover involves synthesis and breakdown in well-regulated balance. In the degenerative state this balance is upset producing inflammation-derived alterations to the synovium, cartilage, capsule, tendons, and bone. Common causes of such alterations include increased loading, physical stress, and traumatic injury to the joint.
1.2 The rationale for the use of corticosteroids in temporomandibular joint therapy is that they inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and decrease the activity of collagenase and other enzymes that degrade the articular cartilage. Platelet rich plasma is a novel therapeutic agent that has several potential advantages over corticosteroids for the treatment of degenerative pathology of the temporomandibular joint. Platelet rich plasma has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti-bacterial properties. It also restores intra-articular hyaluronic acid, increases glycosaminoglycan condrocyte synthesis, balances joint angiogenesis, and provides a scaffold for stem cell migration. Autologous platelet rich plasma injections for treatment of knee cartilage degenerative lesions and osteoarthritis have shown longer efficacy than hyaluronic acid injections in reducing pain and recovering articular function. Similarly, platelet rich plasma has shown to have better outcomes than corticosteroid injections in the management of lateral epicondylitis, and better outcomes than hyaluronic acid injections in the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus.
1.3 Current treatments for degeneration and osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint are focused primarily on palliation by reducing inflammation and inflammatory mediators. This study seeks to validate a therapeutic agent that has the potential to actively prevent the progression of degeneration in addition to reducing pain and inflammation
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) vs Viscosupplementation for the Treatment of Early Knee Articular Degenerative Pathology
NCT02135367
Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injection for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement
NCT02920177
Conventional Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Concentrated Bone Marrow Stem Cell Injections for Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT03271229
Efficacy of PRP (Platelet Rich Plasma) Following Arthroscopic Microfracture of Chondral Lesions of the Hip
NCT02183896
Platelet-rich Plasma vs Viscosupplementation in the Treatment of Knee Articular Degenerative Pathology
NCT01670578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2.1 The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy, in terms of pain relief and improvement in function, of intra-articular injections with platelet rich plasma versus the current standard which is corticosteroid injections into the temporomandibular joint.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (corticosteroid injection group)
Group A will receive one intra-articular injection of 2 ml of solution containing 1ml of 10mg/ml Triamcinolone suspended in 1 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine solution per affected joint
Group A (corticosteroid injection group)
Group B (platelet rich plasma injection)
Group B will receive a 2 ml intra-articular injection of a platelet rich plasma preparation per affected joint
Group B (platelet rich plasma injection group)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group A (corticosteroid injection group)
Group B (platelet rich plasma injection group)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients will also need to have imaging findings (radiography or magnetic resonance imaging) that show mild to severe degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients receiving therapy with anticoagulants
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Husam G Elias, MD, DMD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaiser Permanente
Julian J Wilson, DDS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kaiser Permanente
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
468485
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.