Blinded Safety & Efficacy Placebo Controlled Study of Icatibant for Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Induced Angioedema

NCT ID: NCT01919801

Last Updated: 2021-06-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

118 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-12-02

Study Completion Date

2015-08-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of icatibant with placebo in the treatment for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACE-I)-Induced Angioedema in Adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) are the class of medications prescribed most frequently for the treatment of hypertension. They are also used post myocardial infarction as well as in patients with heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Approximately 35 to 40 million patients are on ACE-Is worldwide.

Study HGT-FIR-096 is a multicenter, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, two-armed, placebo-controlled trial. The study population will consist of 118 adult patients, 18 years of age or older, who present with an acute ACE-I-induced angioedema attack. The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate that icatibant is significantly more effective than placebo in resolving attacks of angioedema caused by ACE-I based on the Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria (TMDC). Safety and tolerability, as well as the pharmacokinetics (PK), of icatibant will also be evaluated. Eligible patients will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single sub-cutaneous injection of either 30 mg icatibant or placebo.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Induced Angioedema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Icatibant

Icatibant at a dose of 30 mg will be administered as a single subcutaneous injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Icatibant

Intervention Type DRUG

Single dose of 30 mg icatibant administered within 12 hours of the onset of an acute attack of ACE-I-induced angioedema

Placebo

Placebo will be administered as a single subcutaneous injection

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Icatibant

Single dose of 30 mg icatibant administered within 12 hours of the onset of an acute attack of ACE-I-induced angioedema

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Firazyr

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female, 18 years of age or older.
2. Patient is currently being treated with an ACE inhibitor.
3. Patient presenting with an ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema attack of the head and/or neck region within 12 hours of onset (must be sufficiently less than 12 hours to allow study drug to be given with 12 hours of attack onset).
4. Angioedema must be considered at least moderate in severity for at least one of the four angioedema-associated airway symptoms (difficulty breathing, difficulty swallowing, voice changes, tongue swelling).
5. Patient must have voluntarily signed an Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee-approved informed consent form after all relevant aspects of the study have been explained and discussed with the patient.
6. Females must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to administration of the study medication, with the exception of those females who have had a total hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy, or who are 2 years post-menopausal.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has a diagnosis of angioedema of other etiology (eg, hereditary or acquired angioedema, allergic angioedema \[eg, food, insect bite or sting, evident clinical response to antihistamines and/or corticosteroids\], anaphylaxis, trauma, abscess or infection or associated disease, local inflammation, local tumor, post-operative or post-radiogenic edema, salivary gland disorders, other \[non-ACE inhibitor\] drug-induced angioedema).
2. Patients with a family history of recurrent angioedema.
3. Patients who have had a previous episode(s) of angioedema while not on ACE inhibitor therapy.
4. Patients with acute urticaria (itchy, erythematous wheals).
5. Patients who have an intervention to support the airway (eg, intubation, tracheotomy, cricothyrotomy) due to the current attack of angioedema.
6. Patient has any of the following vascular conditions that, in the judgment of the investigator, would be a contraindication to participation in the study.

* Unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial ischemia
* Hypertensive urgency or emergency (diastolic blood pressure \[DBP\] \>120 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure \[SBP\] \>180 mm Hg)
* Within 1 month of a stroke or transient ischemic attack
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class IV
7. Patient has a serious or acute condition or illness that, in the judgment of the investigator, would interfere with evaluating the safety and/or efficacy assessments of the study (eg, a condition or illness requiring hemodialysis).
8. Patient is pregnant or breast feeding.
9. Patient has participated in another investigational study in the past 30 days.
10. Patient is unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the protocol, or is unlikely or unable to comply with the protocol assessments, or is unlikely to complete the study for any reason.
11. Patients who are not suitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator.
12. Patient has experienced hypersensitivity to the active substance of the investigational product or to any of its excipients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

PPD Development, LP

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Shire

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Sinai Grace Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

William Beaumont Hospital

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Hennepin County Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Barnes Jewish Hospital

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Inspira Health Network

Vineland, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

University of New Mexico

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Kings County Hospital Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

University of California San Diego Medical Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

University of California San Diego

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

UF Health Shands Hospital

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando Health

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Federal Health Care Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Cook County Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Kansas Cancer Center

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Medical Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Womens Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Baystate Medical Center

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

East Carolina University

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Hospital - East

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Summit Health

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hahnemann University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Temple University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

University of South Carolina School of Medicine

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

John Peter Smith Hospital

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Medical Branch

Galveston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Baylor College of Medicine

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Hotel Dieu Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Soroka University Medical Center

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Bnai Zion Medical Center

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Ziv Medical Center

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital NHS Trust

Exeter, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University Hospital Aintree

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester Royal Infirmary

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queen's Medical Centre

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Israel United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sinert R, Levy P, Bernstein JA, Body R, Sivilotti MLA, Moellman J, Schranz J, Baptista J, Kimura A, Nothaft W; CAMEO study group. Randomized Trial of Icatibant for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Upper Airway Angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1402-1409.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 May 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28552382 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-001213-12

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HGT-FIR-096

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.