Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Versus Sulphonylurea Both in Combination With Metformin During Ramadan in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01917656)
NCT ID: NCT01917656
Last Updated: 2017-08-24
Results Overview
The level of fructosamine in the blood was used to assess the glycaemic control in the patients during the time period described- from start of Ramadan (day -1, visit 8) to end of Ramadan (day 29, visit 12).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
343 participants
Day -1, day 29
2017-08-24
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 39 sites in 7 countries as follows: Algeria: 7 sites; Israel: 4 sites; India: 5 sites; Lebanon: 2 sites; Malaysia: 7 sites; South Africa: 8 sites; United Arab Emirates: 6 sites
Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 manner to either switch to liraglutide 1.8 mg/day added on to metformin or to continue their pre-trial SU and metformin treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
172
|
171
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed
|
171
|
170
|
|
Overall Study
Exposed During Ramadan (Fasting)
|
152
|
163
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
146
|
147
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
26
|
24
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
11
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal criteria
|
8
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Unclassified
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide Versus Sulphonylurea Both in Combination With Metformin During Ramadan in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=171 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=170 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Total
n=341 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.27 • n=5 Participants
|
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.33 • n=7 Participants
|
54.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.30 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
168 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1, day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
The level of fructosamine in the blood was used to assess the glycaemic control in the patients during the time period described- from start of Ramadan (day -1, visit 8) to end of Ramadan (day 29, visit 12).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=146 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=151 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Fructosamine From Start of Ramadan to End of Ramadan
|
-13.2 umol/L
Standard Deviation 36.0
|
-14.9 umol/L
Standard Deviation 43.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
The fructosamine values at the end of Ramadan (visit 12) were presented
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=146 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=151 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fructosamine at End of Ramadan
|
276.8 umol/L
Standard Deviation 44.1
|
284.9 umol/L
Standard Deviation 46.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1, day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
The level of FPG in the blood of fasting patients was addressed to monitor glycaemic control during the period described.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=146 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=157 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Start of Ramadan to End of Ramadan in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-0.1 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
0.1 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
The changes from baseline measured postbaseline (i.e., the changes measured on visit 8 and 12) entered as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment, country, and the stratification variables were included as fixed factors and the corresponding values for the specific endpoint measured at randomisation as covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=143 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=156 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Ramadan in Fasting Plasma Glucose
|
-1.8 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
The level of glycosylated haemoglobin in blood was used to assess the glycaemic control of the patients during the time period described.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=146 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=156 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Ramadan in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
-1.3 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-0.7 Percent (%) glycosylated haemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 29Population: Full analysis set (FAS). The number of subjects in FAS were 171 (Liraglutide) and 169 (Sulfonylurea), few subjects did not contribute to this analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=165 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=168 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to End of Ramadan in Body Weight
|
-5.40 kg
Standard Error 0.2205
|
-1.46 kg
Standard Error 0.2139
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 14 (4 weeks post Ramadan)Population: Full analysis set
Subjects who at end of treatment (Visit 14, 4 weeks post Ramadan) achieve (y/n): HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (ADA target)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=171 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=169 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Who at End of Treatment (4 Weeks Post Ramadan) Achieve (y/n): HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) (ADA Target)
|
51.0 percentage (%) of subjects
|
29.9 percentage (%) of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 14 (4 weeks post Ramadan)Population: Full analysis set
Subjects who at end of treatment (Visit 14, 4 weeks post Ramadan) achieve (y/n): HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (ADA target)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=171 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=169 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subjects Who at End of Treatment (4 Weeks Post Ramadan) Achieve (y/n): HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol), and no Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
|
47.6 percentage (%) of subjects
|
25.2 percentage (%) of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1 to day 29Population: Safety analysis set
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=152 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=163 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
|
246 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
623 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day -1 to day 29Population: Safety analysis set
A serious AE was an experience that at any dose resulted in any of the following: Death, a life-threatening experience, in-patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation, a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly or birth defect, important medical events. Mild - no or transient symptoms, no interference with the subject's daily activities Moderate - marked symptoms, moderate interference with the subject's daily activities Severe - considerable interference with the subject's daily activities, unacceptable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=152 Participants
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=163 Participants
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
Adverse events
|
5258 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
3349 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
Serious adverse events
|
164 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
0 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
Severe adverse events
|
411 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
78 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
Moderate adverse event
|
986 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
779 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
|
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During Ramadan (Fasting), Based on Each Subject's Individual Fasting Period.
Mild adverse event
|
3861 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
2492 Events/1000 years of patient exposure
|
Adverse Events
Liraglutide and Metformin
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=152 participants at risk
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=163 participants at risk
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.66%
1/152 • Number of events 1 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
0.00%
0/163 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.66%
1/152 • Number of events 1 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
0.00%
0/163 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Liraglutide and Metformin
n=152 participants at risk
Liraglutide 1.8 mg administered once daily subcutaneously, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
Sulfonylurea and Metformin
n=163 participants at risk
Subjects continued on pre-trial sulfonylurea tablet treatment, in combination with pre-trial tablet metformin of unchanged dose.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.3%
8/152 • Number of events 9 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
0.61%
1/163 • Number of events 1 • A treatment emergent AE during Ramadan (fasting) had onset on or after the individual subject's first day of Ramadan fasting, and no later than the individual subject's last day of Ramadan fasting.
Safety analysis set included all randomised subjects who were exposed to the trial drug. Subjects in the safety analysis set contributed to the evaluation 'as treated'. A total of 315 randomised subjects were exposed to trial products during Ramadan (fasting), of which 152 subjects were exposed to liraglutide and 163 subjects were exposed to SU.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Novo Nordisk maintains the right to be informed of any Investigator plans for publication and to review any scientific paper, presentation, communication or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol. Any such communication must be submitted in writing to the Novo Nordisk trial manager prior to submission for comments. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the planned communication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER