A Comparator Study of Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray Verses (vs) Cetirizine in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

NCT ID: NCT01916226

Last Updated: 2018-06-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

682 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-01

Study Completion Date

2013-10-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase IV investigational trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a 2-week treatment of fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS) vs. cetirizine on allergic nasal and ocular symptoms and quality of life in adult subjects with SAR. It is hypothesized that FPNS provides greater nasal symptom relief than cetirizine. The primary measure used to test this hypothesis is the change from baseline over two weeks in reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) compared between FPNS and cetirizine. Approximately 648 subjects will be randomized into a 1:1:1:1 ratio of treatment allocation across approximately twenty-five to thirty-five sites in the US during the 2013 fall allergy season. All subjects will be outpatients. The total duration of study will be approximately 21 days including 7 days of screening period, and 14 days of treatment period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial and Seasonal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FPNS arm

Subject will receive two sprays (200 mcg per day)of FP into each nostril once daily (OD) every morning for 14 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FPNS

Intervention Type DRUG

Bottled, 16 gm net fill weight for 120 metered sprays with unit dose strength of 50 mcg per spray.

FPNS Placebo arm

Subject will receive two sprays of FP placebo into each nostril OD every morning for 14 days

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

FPNS Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Bottled placebo nasal spray (vehicle for Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray), 16 gm net fill weight for 120 metered sprays.

Cetirizine arm

Subject will receive Cetirizine capsule by mouth OD in the morning for 14 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cetirizine

Intervention Type DRUG

Over-encapsulated Cetirizine tablet with unit dose strength of 10 mg in High Density Poly Ethylene Bottles (20 count per bottle).

Cetirizine Placebo arm

Subject will receive Cetirizine Placebo capsule by mouth OD in the morning for 14 days

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Cetirizine Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Over-encapsulated Cetirizine matching tablet High Density Poly Ethylene Bottles (20 count per bottle).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FPNS

Bottled, 16 gm net fill weight for 120 metered sprays with unit dose strength of 50 mcg per spray.

Intervention Type DRUG

FPNS Placebo

Bottled placebo nasal spray (vehicle for Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray), 16 gm net fill weight for 120 metered sprays.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cetirizine

Over-encapsulated Cetirizine tablet with unit dose strength of 10 mg in High Density Poly Ethylene Bottles (20 count per bottle).

Intervention Type DRUG

Cetirizine Placebo

Over-encapsulated Cetirizine matching tablet High Density Poly Ethylene Bottles (20 count per bottle).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Informed consent: Subject must give their signed and dated written informed consent to participate. Subject must understand and be willing, able, and likely to comply with study procedures and restrictions. Subject must be able to read, comprehend, and record information in English.
* Subject is treatable on an outpatient basis.
* Age: \>=18 years of age at Visit 1.
* Gender: Male or eligible female subjects. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is of non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post-menopausal or surgically sterile). Surgically sterile females are defined as those with a documented hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation. Post-menopausal females are defined as being amenorrhoeic for greater than 1 year with an appropriate clinical profile, e.g., age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms. OR Childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at screening and agreeable to using one of the acceptable contraceptive methods consistently and correctly (i.e., in accordance with the approved product label and the instructions of the physician for the duration of the study). An eligible female is also not lactating nor planning on becoming pregnant during the study.
* Diagnosis of SAR, defined as documented clinical history or physician verification of subject reported historical SAR during each of the last two fall allergy seasons and a positive skin prick test (wheal \>=3 millimeter \[mm\] larger than the negative control) to a prevalent local fall allergen within 12 months prior to Visit 1 or at Visit 1.
* Adequate exposure to local fall pollen: Subject resides within a geographical region where exposure to the local fall pollen to which they are sensitized is expected to be moderate or greater during the study period. Subject does not plan to travel outside the geographical region where exposure to local fall pollen to which they are sensitized is expected to be moderate or greater for more than 48 hours during the study period.

At Visit 2, the subject must meet the following criteria

* Eligible subjects will need to have moderate to severe SAR symptoms, defined as a morning rTNSS of \>=7 on at least four of the last seven days leading up to randomization. This includes the AM assessment on the morning of the randomization visit at Visit 2.
* Subjects should demonstrate at least a 70% compliance rate with both their placebo run-in study medications and their e-diary completion prior to randomization. This period includes the day of Visit 1 until the day before randomization at Visit 2.
* Subjects should have no significant change in medical condition(s) that would have been exclusionary at Visit 1.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects should not have travelled outside the local pollen region for more than 48 hours during the run-in period.


* Significant concomitant medical conditions, defined as but not limited to:

Historical or current evidence of a clinically significant uncontrolled disease of any body system (e.g., tuberculosis, psychological disorders, eczema, uncontrolled asthma). Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through study participation or which would confound the interpretation of the study results if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.

A severe physical obstruction of the nose (e.g., deviated septum or nasal polyp) or nasal septal perforation that could affect the deposition of intranasal study drug.

Nasal (e.g., nasal septum), ocular, or throat injury, or surgery to these areas in the last 3 months.

Rhinitis medicamentosa. Bacterial or viral infection (e.g., common cold) of the eyes or upper respiratory tract within two weeks of Visit 1 or during the screening period.

Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis, as determined by the individual investigator.

Current or history of glaucoma and/or cataracts or ocular herpes simplex. Physical impairment that would affect subject's ability to safely and fully participate in the study.

Clinical evidence of a Candida infection of the nose. History of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation, substance abuse (including drug and alcohol) or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent or that would confound the interpretation of the study results.

History of adrenal insufficiency.

* Use of corticosteroids, defined as: Intranasal corticosteroid within four weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the treatment period. Inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous, ocular, and/or dermatological corticosteroid (with the exception of hydrocortisone cream/ointment, 1% or less) within eight weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the treatment period.
* Use of allergy medications, within a timeframe relative to Visit 1, that would prevent the medication from being eliminated and/or have an effect. Exclusionary timeframes relative to Visit 1 for five common allergy treatments are noted below Intranasal cromolyn (\<=2 weeks from Visit 1). Intranasal or systemic decongestants (\<=3 days from Visit 1). Intranasal or systemic (other than oral) antihistamines (\<=3 days from Visit 1).

Leukotriene modifiers (\<=3 days from Visit 1). Oral antihistamines (\<=2 days from Visit 1). Allergy medications, other than study supplied medications, are not allowed during the study.

* Use of other medications that may affect allergic rhinitis or its symptoms, e.g., use of any ocular antihistamines, artificial tears, eyewashes/nasal irrigation solutions, homeopathic preparations, lubricants, sympathomimetic or vasoconstrictor preparations during the screening and treatment periods
* Use of any medications (prescription or non-prescription) or alcohol to induce sleep 48-hours prior to Visit 1 and during the treatment period.
* Use of other intranasally administered medications (e.g., calcitonin), including herbals and homeopathics during the run-in (Visit 1 - Visit 2) and treatment period.
* Use of immunosuppressive medications within 8 weeks prior to screening and during the treatment period.
* Use of any medications that significantly inhibit the cytochrome P450 subfamily enzyme CYP3A4 (e.g., ritonavir, ketoconazole) during the run-in (Visit 1 - Visit 2) and treatment period.
* Known hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or any excipients present in the nasal spray.
* Known hypersensitivity to cetirizine or any excipients in the tablet.
* Recent exposure to an investigational study drug or device within 30 days of Visit 1.
* Affiliation with investigator site: Study investigators, sub-investigators, study coordinators, employees of a participating investigator or immediate family members of the aforementioned are excluded from participating in this study.
* Chickenpox or measles during the last 3 weeks prior to screening and is non-immune.
* Immunotherapy is exclusionary unless the immunotherapy was initiated \>=30 days from Visit 1 and if the dose has remained fixed over the 30 days prior to Visit 1, and the dose will remain fixed for the duration of the study.
* Drug/alcohol abuse: Subjects with a known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within the last 2 years which in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with the subject's proper completion of the protocol requirement.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

GSK Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

GlaxoSmithKline

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GSK Investigational Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Lenexa, Kansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Rolla, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Kerrville, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

South Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

GSK Investigational Site

Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ford LB, Matz J, Hankinson T, Prillaman B, Georges G. A comparison of fluticasone propionate nasal spray and cetirizine in ragweed fall seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):313-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3860.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26108088 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Individual Participant Data Set

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Dataset Specification

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Annotated Case Report Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Clinical Study Report

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200165

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.