Postoperative Vomiting in Children - Is Dextrose an Effective Prophylactic Anti-emetic?

NCT ID: NCT01912807

Last Updated: 2021-10-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-12-31

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative intravenous dextrose in preventing POV in pediatric population undergoing dental day surgery.

Post-operative vomiting (POV) in children is a frequent complication. Studies using intravenous (IV) fluids containing dextrose in the perioperative period have shown improvement of POV in adults. Similar studies have not been done in children.

Knowing that Intravenous (IV) fluids containing dextrose are safe and commonly used in the paediatric population, this intervention could potentially reduce the amount of rescue antiemetic medications and improve recovery in same-day surgery paediatric patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A non-inferiority randomized control trial of healthy children (3-9 years old) undergoing ambulatory dental surgery was conducted to investigate the efficacy of intraoperative IV fluids containing dextrose for antiemetic prophylaxis.

The control group (146 participants) received dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg IV) and ondansetron (0.05 mg/kg IV); the intervention group (144) received dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg IV) and intravenous 5% dextrose in 0.9% normal saline (D5NS) as per a weight based maintenance rate.

Patients underwent a general anesthetic maintained with a volatile anesthetic. There was not a standardized protocol for anesthetic induction and maintenance, and all types and doses of anesthetic medications were chosen and administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Intraoperative administration of any other antiemetic medications constituted protocol violation and excluded the patient from analysis. There were no modifications to the planned dental procedure.

Once IV access was established and the patient was intubated, the maintenance study solution was connected and infused throughout the operative period. Additional fluid (Ringer's Lactate) was available to the anesthesiologists to administer as per their preference.

The study drug was administered to the patient by the anesthesiologist at the end of the procedure, when the throat packing was removed and the IV maintenance study solution was stopped. Before emergence from anesthesia, the researcher measured and recorded the patient's blood sugar via a chemstrip (AccuCheck aviva ®). Ringer's Lactate IV fluid, not part of study protocol, was continued in recovery based on the anesthesiologist's preference.

All patients were transferred to the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) at the end of the procedure. Discharge from the PACU was based on the Post Anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADSS) and institutional guidelines. Nursing staff and researchers recorded the presence and incidence of POV in the PACU. Analgesics and antiemetic agents were prescribed by the anesthesiologist during the recovery period and given according to nursing assessment based on institutional guidelines.

Researchers phoned participants 24 hours after discharge to inquire about incidence of emesis and any need to seek medical attention after being discharged from the institution.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Vomiting

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Postoperative vomiting Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dextrose (D5NS)

The participants received Dexamethasone (dose 0,15 mg/Kg) as standard antiemetic prophylaxis and Dextrose 5% in 0.9 % Normal Saline (D5NS) was used as a second antiemetic, at an intravenous rate calculated based on their weight and determined for the purpose of the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dextrose (D5NS)

Intervention Type DRUG

Solution Dextrose 5% in Normal Saline (D5NS) was used as a second antiemetic, at an intravenous maintenace rate (4 cc per Kg for first 10 Kg, 2 cc per Kg for next 10 Kg and 1 cc per Kg for the next Kg of weight) calculated based on the patient's weight

Ondansetron (Control)

The control group received Dexamethasone (dose 0,15 mg/Kg) as standard antiemetic prophylaxis. Ondansetron (dose 0,05 mg/Kg) was used as a second prophylactic antiemetic.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ondansetron (Control)

Intervention Type DRUG

Ondansetron was used at a prophylactic dose (0,05 mg per Kg) based on patient's weight.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dextrose (D5NS)

Solution Dextrose 5% in Normal Saline (D5NS) was used as a second antiemetic, at an intravenous maintenace rate (4 cc per Kg for first 10 Kg, 2 cc per Kg for next 10 Kg and 1 cc per Kg for the next Kg of weight) calculated based on the patient's weight

Intervention Type DRUG

Ondansetron (Control)

Ondansetron was used at a prophylactic dose (0,05 mg per Kg) based on patient's weight.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dextrose 5% in 0,9% Normal Saline Zofran

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 3 to 9 Years of age
* Male and Female
* ASA I and II
* Paediatric patients undergoing same-day dental procedures at the Prairieview Surgical Centre.

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<3 or \>9
* Underlying pro-emetic disease
* Positive history of POV in the patient, parent or sibling
* Currently on antiemetic medications
* Parent refusal to sign consent
* History of juvenile diabetes
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

9 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Saskatchewan

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrea Vasquez

Clinical Assistant Professor - University of Saskatchewan, Department of Academic Family Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea Vasquez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Saskatchewan

Jonathan Gamble, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Saskatchewan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Prairieview Surgical Centre

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vasquez-Camargo A, Gamble J, Fedoruk KA, Lim HJJ, Mondal PK, Martinez J, Miller GG. Intravenous dextrose versus ondansetron for prevention of postoperative vomiting in children: a randomized non-inferiority trial. Can J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;67(10):1333-1340. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01757-7. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32696227 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13-163

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id