Trial Outcomes & Findings for Lurasidone Pediatric Autism Study (NCT NCT01911442)
NCT ID: NCT01911442
Last Updated: 2016-02-25
Results Overview
The ABC irritability subscale score is the sum of 15 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45. Higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
150 participants
Baseline to 6 Weeks
2016-02-25
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from 46 centers in the United States between August 2013 and October 2014
Participants were screened and washed out up to 21 days.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
49
|
51
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
43
|
47
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
4
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Mother's Work Schedule
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Lurasidone Pediatric Autism Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Total
n=149 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
49 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
149 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
39 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
38 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
124 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
35 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
49 participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 participants
n=27 Participants
|
149 participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 WeeksPopulation: Intent to treat (ITT) population includes all randomized subjects who receive at least one dose of study medication and have at least one post-baseline assessment in any efficacy variable.
The ABC irritability subscale score is the sum of 15 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC irritability subscale score ranges from 0 to 45. Higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=48 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Irritability Subscale Score at Week 6
|
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
|
9.4 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 WeeksPopulation: Intent to treat population. 49 in the placebo arm is correct. One subject in the placebo group did not receive the study medication, and therefore that subject was removed from the ITT population. A total of 50 subjects were randomized and 49 subjects were included in the placebo group of the ITT population.
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Scale is rated on a 7-point scale of severity with 1 = Normal, not at all ill to 7 = Among the most extremely ill patients. Higher values of CGI-S scores represent greater severity of illness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=48 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) at Week 6
|
-1.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
-0.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 6 WeeksPopulation: ITT
The ABC hyperactivity and noncompliance subscale score is the sum of 16 items, each rated among 0 = Not at all; 1 = Slight in degree; 2 = Moderately serious; and 3 = Severe in degree. The ABC hyperactivity and noncompliance subscale score may range from 0 to 48. In general, higher values of ABC subscale scores represent greater severity of illness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=48 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) Hyperactivity Subscale Score at Week 6
|
-9.7 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.50
|
-6.6 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.43
|
-7.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 WeeksPopulation: ITT
CY-BOCS total score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher value of CY-BOCS scores the greater severity of illness. This table is a summary of Y-BOCS compulsion total score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=48 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scales (CY-BOCS) Modified for Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs)
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 WeeksPopulation: ITT
CGSQ is a caregiver reported assessment to assesses extent to which caregivers are affected by special demands associated with caring for a child with emotional/behavioral problems. CGSQ is comprised of three subscales which range in severity from 1 to 5 (Objective Strain, Subjective Externalized Strain, Subjective Internalized Strain), The 3 subscales are calculated as the averages of the corresponding individual items. Higher scores on each indicates greater strain. A Global Strain score is calculated by summing the three subscales (Objective Strain, Subjective Externalized Strain, Subjective Internalized Strain) to provide an indication of the total impact of the special demands on the family. Global Strain scores range from 3 to 15. As with the individual subscales, higher scores indicate greater strain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=48 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Caregiver Strain Questionnaire (CGSQ)
|
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.292
|
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.274
|
-1.35 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.300
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 WeeksPopulation: ITT - the current data presented is at week 6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=43 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=47 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects Who Have CGI-I Score of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) at Week 6
|
17 percentage of subjects
|
17 percentage of subjects
|
14 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 WeeksPopulation: ITT
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=43 Participants
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=47 Participants
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects Who Have at Least 25% Reduction From Baseline to Week 6 in the ABC Irritability Subscale Score.
|
25 percentage of subjects
|
26 percentage of subjects
|
23 percentage of subjects
|
Adverse Events
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=49 participants at risk
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 participants at risk
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 participants at risk
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Torus Fracture
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper Limb Fracture
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Lurasidone 20 mg Once Daily
n=49 participants at risk
Subjects received 20 mg/day from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
Lurasidone 60 mg Once Daily
n=51 participants at risk
Subjects received lurasidone 20 mg/day from Days 1-3, 40 mg/day from Days 4-6 and 60 mg/day from Day 7 to Week 6 Visit. One-time dose reduction to Lurasidone 40 mg/day may occur in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 (ie, between Day 8 to Day 29, inclusive).
|
Placebo
n=49 participants at risk
Subject received placebo to match lurasidone from Day 1 to Week 6 Visit
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
27.5%
14/51 • Number of events 17 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
8.2%
4/49 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
17.6%
9/51 • Number of events 10 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Akathisia
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 6 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Psychomotor Hyperactivity
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in Attention
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharynigitis
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
10.2%
5/49 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 5 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Investigations
Weight Increased
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/49 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased Appetite
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
6.1%
3/49 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Enuresis
|
0.00%
0/49 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
0.00%
0/51 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
4.1%
2/49 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected as spontaneous reports at all visits
Participant flow module presents all subjects randomized. The summary of AEs is based on safety population. As explained earlier, there were 49 placebo subjects included in the safety population.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee There IS agreement between Principal Investigator and Sponsor that restricts PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after trial is completed. In addition to the \<60-180 day restriction above, since this is a multicenter study, 1st publication of study results shall be made with other participating study sites as a multicenter publication provided, if a multicenter publication is not forthcoming within 24 months post completion of study at all sites, PI shall be free to publish.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER