Trial Outcomes & Findings for Managing Diabetes in Pregnancy Using Cell Phone/Internet Technology (NCT NCT01907516)
NCT ID: NCT01907516
Last Updated: 2015-06-03
Results Overview
Compliance was calculated as a percentage for each method (Confidant or Voicemail) by dividing the total number of reported glucose readings among all participants by the total number of expected readings (4 daily) over the 6 week study time period. Women with gestational diabetes are instructed to monitor their glucose 4 times per day.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
6 weeks
2015-06-03
Participant Flow
Subjects were participants in the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children's (KMCWC) diabetes in pregnancy program known as "A Sweeter Choice". Subjects were enrolled between February 4, 2009 and 3/11/2010.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cell Phone-internet First, Then Voicemail
Cell phone-internet home glucose reporting system first, then voicemail
|
Voicemail First, Then Cell Phone-internet
Voicemail home blood glucose reporting first, then cell phone-internet
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
STARTED
|
50
|
50
|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
40
|
34
|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
16
|
|
Second Intervention (3 Weeks)
STARTED
|
40
|
34
|
|
Second Intervention (3 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
40
|
34
|
|
Second Intervention (3 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cell Phone-internet First, Then Voicemail
Cell phone-internet home glucose reporting system first, then voicemail
|
Voicemail First, Then Cell Phone-internet
Voicemail home blood glucose reporting first, then cell phone-internet
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
9
|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
3
|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
Delivered before second arm
|
3
|
4
|
|
First Intervention (3 Weeks)
Developed DKA during study
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Managing Diabetes in Pregnancy Using Cell Phone/Internet Technology
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cell Phone-internet First, the Voicemail
n=50 Participants
Cell phone-internet home glucose reporting system first
|
Voicemail First, Then Cell Phone-internet
n=50 Participants
Voicemail home blood glucose reporting first
|
Total
n=100 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.79 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.94 • n=5 Participants
|
32.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.76 • n=7 Participants
|
33.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.37 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
50 participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 participants
n=7 Participants
|
100 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksCompliance was calculated as a percentage for each method (Confidant or Voicemail) by dividing the total number of reported glucose readings among all participants by the total number of expected readings (4 daily) over the 6 week study time period. Women with gestational diabetes are instructed to monitor their glucose 4 times per day.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Used Confidant Method
n=74 Participants
Cell phone-internet home based glucose monitoring first, then conventional Voicemail system for home glucose reporting
|
Used Voicemail Method
n=74 Participants
Voicemail first, then cell phone-internet home glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Compliance With Home Blood Glucose Reporting
|
89.3 percentage of expected glucose tests
|
87.6 percentage of expected glucose tests
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeksSatisfaction was measured with a survey after completing using both reporting methods
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Used Confidant Method
n=74 Participants
Cell phone-internet home based glucose monitoring first, then conventional Voicemail system for home glucose reporting
|
Used Voicemail Method
Voicemail first, then cell phone-internet home glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subject Satisfaction
|
67 percentage of participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Cell Phone-internet First, Then Voicemail
Voicemail First, Then Cell Phone-internet
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Marguerite Lisa Bartholomew MD
John A Burns School of Medicine / University of Hawaii Dept of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place