Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy of IQP- AK-102 in Reducing Body Weight (NCT NCT01905956)
NCT ID: NCT01905956
Last Updated: 2016-03-08
Results Overview
Body weight (kg) was measured in subjects wearing underwear and no shoes using calibrated weighing scales (Tanita BC-420 SMA). Results were reported as value at baseline minus value at week-12, ie. amount of weight loss in (kg) (positive values).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
119 participants
Baseline and 12 weeks
2016-03-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
59
|
|
Overall Study
Intention-to-treat Population
|
57
|
54
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
54
|
48
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy of IQP- AK-102 in Reducing Body Weight
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=57 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=54 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
Total
n=111 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
57 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
111 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=93 Participants
|
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=4 Participants
|
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
40 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
57 participants
n=93 Participants
|
54 participants
n=4 Participants
|
111 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
57 participants
n=93 Participants
|
54 participants
n=4 Participants
|
111 participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Height
|
169.3 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=93 Participants
|
168.2 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.0 • n=4 Participants
|
168.8 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
83.0 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=93 Participants
|
80.8 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 • n=4 Participants
|
81.9 kilogram (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
29.3 kilogram per metre square (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=93 Participants
|
29.0 kilogram per metre square (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=4 Participants
|
29.2 kilogram per metre square (kg/m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Waist Circumference
|
102.1 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=93 Participants
|
98.5 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 • n=4 Participants
|
100.4 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Hip Circumference
|
110.2 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3 • n=93 Participants
|
108.7 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=4 Participants
|
109.5 centimetres (cm)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
|
123.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=93 Participants
|
128.1 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=4 Participants
|
125.9 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
|
79.7 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=93 Participants
|
81.3 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=4 Participants
|
80.5 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Heart Rate
|
70.6 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.3 • n=93 Participants
|
70.7 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=4 Participants
|
70.6 Beats per minute
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeksBody weight (kg) was measured in subjects wearing underwear and no shoes using calibrated weighing scales (Tanita BC-420 SMA). Results were reported as value at baseline minus value at week-12, ie. amount of weight loss in (kg) (positive values).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=57 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=54 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 12
|
3.53 kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
0.14 kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 1.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeksWaist circumference (cm) was measured at the level midway between the lateral lower rib margin and the iliac crest. Hip circumference (cm) was measured as the maximal circumference over the buttocks. Results were reported as value at baseline minus value at week-12, ie. amount of waist and hip circumference reduction (cm) (positive values).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=57 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=54 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Waist and Hip Circumference (cm) From Baseline to Week 12
Waist Circumference
|
2.12 centimetre (cm)
Standard Deviation 2.99
|
0.92 centimetre (cm)
Standard Deviation 3.24
|
|
Mean Change in Waist and Hip Circumference (cm) From Baseline to Week 12
Hip Circumference
|
2.25 centimetre (cm)
Standard Deviation 2.41
|
1.07 centimetre (cm)
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeksPopulation: Analysis of body fat was not performed for 1 subject (placebo) due to missing data from Visit 2 - Visit 5. At Visit 1, analysis was performed for 109 subjects only. As such, short of 1 baseline date.
Body fat content (%) was measured by bio-impedance method using validated electronic weighing scales (Tanita BC-420 SMA). Results were reported as value at baseline minus value at week-12, ie. reduction of body fat content (%) (positive values).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=57 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=53 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Body Fat Content (%) From Baseline to Week 12
|
0.95 Percentage of body fat (%)
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
0.08 Percentage of body fat (%)
Standard Deviation 1.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeksPopulation: Analysis of body fat was not performed for 1 subject (placebo) due to missing data from Visit 2 - Visit 5. At Visit 1, analysis was performed for 109 subjects only. As such, short of 1 baseline date.
Body fat mass kg) was measured by bio-impedance method using validated electronic weighing scales (Tanita BC-420 SMA). Results were reported as value at baseline minus value at week-12, ie. reduction of body fat mass kg) (positive values).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=57 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=53 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Body Fat Mass (kg) From Baseline to Week 12
|
1.32 kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 2.91
|
0.05 kilogram (kg)
Standard Deviation 1.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeksPopulation: The analysis is performed for all subjects of the Intention-to-treat population who answered the FCQ at all visits from v2 to v5. Missing data were appeared in 9 cases at visit v5 and additional in 8 cases at visit v4.
This validated questionnaire evaluates changes in food cravings. It contains 15 items and was completed by the subjects based on the momentary feeling at the study site during visits 2 to 5 (Baseline and week 4, 8 and 12). Assessment was based on the following 5-point Likert scale: 1. = I do not agree at all 2. = I do not agree 3. = Neutral 4. = I agree 5. = I highly agree Results were expressed as the mean score for the whole population in the respective intervention group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=52 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=47 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ)
Baseline
|
2.65 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
2.74 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ)
Week 4
|
2.17 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
2.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
|
Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ)
Week 8
|
1.98 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
2.34 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Food Craving Questionnaire (FCQ)
Week 12
|
2.31 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
2.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The analysis is performed for all subjects of the Intention-to-treat population who answered the questions for the assessment. However, missing data still appeared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=53 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=45 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Investigators
Very Good
|
31 subjects
|
1 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Investigators
Good
|
18 subjects
|
6 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Investigators
Moderate
|
4 subjects
|
19 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Investigators
Poor
|
0 subjects
|
19 subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The analysis is performed for all subjects of the Intention-to-treat population who answered the questions for the assessment. However, missing data still appeared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=54 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=44 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Subjects
Very Good
|
28 subjects
|
1 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Subjects
Good
|
22 subjects
|
6 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Subjects
Moderate
|
4 subjects
|
22 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Efficacy by the Subjects
Poor
|
0 subjects
|
15 subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The analysis is performed for all subjects of the Intention-to-treat population who answered the questions for the assessment. However, missing data still appeared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=52 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=43 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Investigators
Very Good
|
46 subjects
|
35 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Investigators
Good
|
6 subjects
|
7 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Investigators
Moderate
|
0 subjects
|
1 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Investigators
Poor
|
0 subjects
|
0 subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: The analysis is performed for all subjects of the Intention-to-treat population who answered the questions for the assessment. However, missing data still appeared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=53 Participants
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=45 Participants
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Subjects
Poor
|
0 subjects
|
0 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Subjects
Very Good
|
46 subjects
|
37 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Subjects
Good
|
7 subjects
|
7 subjects
|
|
Global Evaluation of Safety by the Subjects
Moderate
|
0 subjects
|
1 subjects
|
Adverse Events
IQP-AK-102
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=58 participants at risk
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=56 participants at risk
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate Cancer
|
1.7%
1/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
IQP-AK-102
n=58 participants at risk
2 capsules per dose, three times daily
IQP-AK-102
|
Placebo
n=56 participants at risk
2 capsules per dose, 3 times daily
Placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Common cold or upper respiratory tract infection
|
10.3%
6/58 • Number of events 6 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 4 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Toothache or dental extraction
|
0.00%
0/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 3 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal complaints
|
0.00%
0/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Headaches and Migraine
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
General disorders
Distortion and contusion of knee
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Allergic Rhinitis
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abcess of the skin
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Acute Sciatica (Dorsalgia)
|
0.00%
0/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular degeneration
|
0.00%
0/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Infection of urinary tract
|
0.00%
0/58 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea & Vomiting
|
3.4%
2/58 • Number of events 2 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.7%
1/58 • Number of events 1 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
0.00%
0/56 • During the treatment period ie. 12 weeks.
The causality of the AEs and intake of IP was assessed by the clinician. Three subjects who were excluded (due to violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and treatment compliance) in the Intention-to-treat population were included in the adverse events analysis.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place