Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2011-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Effective plaque control techniques have been suggested that maintain dental biofilm at levels compatible with oral health and is the cornerstone for all preventive strategies to control oral diseases particularly gingivitis. To clean teeth and ensure effective plaque control, different mechanical means have been in use since centuries. However because of an inadequacy in plaque removal, different antimicrobial and antiplaque agents have been introduced in oral-care products.
The use of dentifrices has been recommended over the years as the ultimate way of preventing the incidence of oral diseases. Dentifrices have the anti-plaque and the anti-gingivitis capabilities due to their composition. Toothpastes and to a lesser extent toothpowders are common oral-care products used to eliminate plaque and other deposits from tooth surfaces. Existent literature has focused more on toothpaste and mouth rinse and derelicts toothpowder despite its difference owing to the absence of humectants. With the intention to advance the knowledge on this issue as well as close the research gap, this study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of toothpowder in alleviating gingivitis, controlling dental plaque, and inhibiting extrinsic stains.
A single-blind, parallel arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the efficacy of toothpowder against toothpaste through oral hygiene parameters of plaque and stain deposits on teeth and gingival inflammation. Plaque Index, Lobene Stain Index and Gingival Index were used as measures of oral hygiene.
The current RCT revealed that toothpowder and toothpaste were equally effective in both treatment and control groups from clinical perspective however toothpowder showed a statistically significant effectiveness as compared to toothpaste. Toothpowder, composed of calcium carbonate and essential oils, has demonstrated to be statistically more effective than toothpaste in controlling extrinsic dental staining, dental plaque and gingival inflammation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Toothpaste on the Reduction of Plaque and Inflammation
NCT02552589
Plaque Control Efficacy Between Interdental Brushes Versus Dental Floss
NCT05439785
To Investigate the Clinical Efficacy of an Experimental Toothpaste
NCT01079910
Toothpaste With Sodium Carbonate in Patients With Gingivitis
NCT06224699
Effectiveness of the Use of Dental Floss
NCT04909840
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Outcome measure gingivitis was measured through plaque index, gingival index and Lobene stain index.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tooth powder (test) arm
Experimental arm: tooth powder
Tooth powder
Each participant was handed over a sealed pack containing a teeth cleaning kit that included tooth powder (test) or toothpaste (control) and a new soft toothbrush along with written and verbal instructions of usage. They were advised to brush their teeth twice a day with the given dentifrices and tooth brush for two weeks.
Tooth Paste (control)
Tooth Paste
Tooth paste (control)
Active Comparator
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tooth powder
Each participant was handed over a sealed pack containing a teeth cleaning kit that included tooth powder (test) or toothpaste (control) and a new soft toothbrush along with written and verbal instructions of usage. They were advised to brush their teeth twice a day with the given dentifrices and tooth brush for two weeks.
Tooth paste (control)
Active Comparator
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥ 18-to-65 years (18th birthday completed)
3. In good general health
4. Available for the duration of the study
5. Able and willing to follow study protocol
6. Able and willing to sign approved informed consent
7. At least 20 natural teeth suitable for evaluation
8. Full mouth Gingival Index (GI) score ≥ 1.04
Exclusion Criteria
2. Having any acute /chronic systemic illness
3. Current smokers or tobacco users
4. Pregnant or lactating Females
5. Allergy to the ingredients of the products to be tested
6. Requiring pre-medication prior to dental appointment
7. Antibiotic use in the last 3 months
8. Routine use of anticoagulant medication
9. Routine use of anti-inflammatory medication
10. Routine use of medications known to have effects on the gingiva e.g., phenytoin etc)
11. Routine use of medications inhibiting or stimulating salivary flow
12. Physical handicap that could interfere with daily performance of oral hygiene
13. Participation in any other study during the study period of this trial
14. Routine use of any mouthrinse
15. Routine use of any interdental cleaning device (floss, dental toothpicks)
16. Having any removable appliance
17. Having fixed orthodontic appliances (including permanent orthodontic retainers)
18. Having probing depth ≥4 mm at any site
19. Having had active periodontal therapy during the last 6 months
20. Had periodontal prophylaxis or periodontal maintenance therapy in the last 3 months
21. More than 3 carious lesions requiring immediate care
22. Gross oral pathology (e.g., tumors, candidiasis, mucocutaneous disease)
33 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fatima Jinnah Dental College
OTHER
Sheikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Muhammad Khalil Khan
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ayyaz A Khan, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of the Punjab
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KhanMK-2012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.