A Phase III Study to Assess the Immunogenicity and Safety of Eutravac (DTap-HB Combined Vaccine) With DTaP and Hepatitis B Vaccines in Healthy Infants

NCT ID: NCT01896739

Last Updated: 2013-07-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

289 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-08-31

Study Completion Date

2011-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate and compare the immunogenicity of Eutravac (Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis \[DTaP\] Hepatitis B \[HB\] combined) vaccine with separate but simultaneous administrations of DTaP and HB vaccine each administered to healthy infants, as measured by seroprotection/vaccine response rates 4-8 weeks post-final immunisation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Infants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group with 0-2-4-6 schedule

HB at 0, Eutravac at 2-4-6

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eutravac

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Active comparator group with 0-2-4-6 schedule

Separate injection of DTaP and HB at 2-4-6 (for DTaP) and 0-1-6 (HB)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eutravac

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Experimental group with 2-4-6 schedule

Eutravac at 2-4-6

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Eutravac

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Active comparator group with 2-4-6 schedule

Separate injection of DTaP and HB at 2-4-6 (for DTaP) and 0-1-6 (HB)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Eutravac

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Eutravac

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LG DTaP Vaccine Inj. (DTaP) Euvax B (Hepatitis B) Hepavax (Hepatitis B)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Were healthy, male or female infants born at full term pregnancy (≥37 weeks) with a birth weight ≥2.5 kg to mothers with a negative HBsAg serology, documented prior to giving birth as per routine, site-specific ante-natal care procedures.
* Signed parental or legally acceptable representative's informed consent was obtained

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of an acute febrile illness with axillary temperature ≥37.5℃ on the day of the vaccination. Infants with symptoms of minor illness eg, mild gastroenteritis, mild upper respiratory tract infection and who did not have a temperature ≥37.5℃ on the day of the vaccination could be included at the Investigator's discretion
* History of diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis or hepatitis B disease
* History of any vaccine-related hypersensitivity or anaphylactic reaction after previous administration of Euvax B
Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

LG Life Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital

Daejeon, Daejeon, South Korea

Site Status

The Catholic University of Korea ST. Vincent's Hospital

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Inha University Hospital

Incheon, Incheon, South Korea

Site Status

Jeju National University Hospital

Jeju City, Jeju-do, South Korea

Site Status

Kyung Hee University Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Cha Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Korea Cancer Center Hospital

Seoul, Seoul, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LG-VACL004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.