Immunosuppression in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

NCT ID: NCT01884571

Last Updated: 2017-11-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicenter, 15-month study evaluating the effect of immunosuppression treatment on the rate of change on the ALS Functional Rating Scale (Revised) (ALSFRS-R) score in up to 33 subjects with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In an ongoing safety trial of neural stem cell injections into the spinal cord of patients with ALS at Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, one patient has demonstrated clear improvement by objective clinical and electrophysiological measures, a finding that is unheard of in patients with ALS.

This patient had an improvement in ALSFRS-R by 1.4 points per month. In 826 historical controls from the Northeast ALS Consortium (NEALS) and the Western ALS Consortium (WALS) database where ALSFRS-R was documented at 2 or more visits, there have been no patients that have shown improvement in ALSFRS as seen in this case. Additionally, 5 patients in the stem cell trial who were not on mechanical ventilators at the time of surgery seem to have very slow disease progression as compared to the expectation from current understanding of typical disease course. This observation raises consideration for a disease-modifying effect of the novel immunosuppression regimen used in this trial. Also, given that ALS is clinically an extraordinarily heterogeneous disease, the diagnosis of ALS may represent a group of phenotypically similar but pathogenically variable disorders. It is possible that there exists a subset of patients with an immune-responsive ALS subtype that has not been previously recognized.

Recent studies have furthered the understanding of the immune mechanisms that contribute to ALS progression. Microglia and lymphocytes have both neurotoxic and neuroprotective functions depending on activation states and physiologic conditions within the nervous system. Therefore, targeted immunotherapies that proportionally suppress neurotoxic immune elements, while sparing or promoting protective elements, seemingly have more potential to modify disease course in ALS than previously tested regimens. It is postulated that the immunosuppression treatment given to the stem cell patients may have exhibited neuroprotective effects by favorably promoting the ratio of regulatory T cells and other protective immune mediators in relation to neurotoxic immune modulators. It is hoped that this trial will optimize the chance of replicating these findings and advance knowledge about the complex changes that occur within the immune system in patients with ALS before and after treatment with an immunosuppression regimen.

The primary outcome measure will be rate of change of ALSFRS-R. A clinical response will be defined as a rate of change of ALSFRS-R of +6 points over a 6 month period (mean of change of +1 point per month).

Secondary outcome measures will include slow vital capacity (SVC), grip strength, and hand held dynamometry (HHD). The change in rate of progression in clinical measures will be monitored to look for a potential disease-modifying effect of the immunosuppression regimen. Blood and cerebrospinal fluid immune system markers will be also be studied.

If a clinical response is seen among study participants following treatment, further analyses will be conducted to explore any differential effects of immunosuppression in participants with early-stage disease and later-stage disease. To ensure adequate numbers of participants for conditional analyses stratifying by symptom onset date, participants will be enrolled based on symptom onset within 24 months of the screening visit or more than 24 months before screening. All participants will have the same treatment and will be treated as a single group for the analyses of the main study outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Immunosuppression ALS Neuromuscular Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Immunosuppression Regimen

Basiliximab Methylprednisolone Prednisone Tacrolimus Mycophenolate mofetil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Basiliximab

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg, IV (in the vein) on day 1 and 4.

Methylprednisolone

Intervention Type DRUG

125 mg, IV (in the vein) on day 1.

Prednisone

Intervention Type DRUG

60 mg PO (by mouth) on days 2-7, 40 mg PO days 8-14, 20 mg PO days 15-21, and 10mg PO days 22-28.

Tacrolimus

Intervention Type DRUG

1-5 mg PO, twice a day (BID) days 2-180.

Mycophenolate mofetil

Intervention Type DRUG

500 mg PO, BID days 2-7, 500 mg PO each morning and 1000 mg each night, days 8-14, 1000 mg PO BID days 15-180.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Basiliximab

20 mg, IV (in the vein) on day 1 and 4.

Intervention Type DRUG

Methylprednisolone

125 mg, IV (in the vein) on day 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Prednisone

60 mg PO (by mouth) on days 2-7, 40 mg PO days 8-14, 20 mg PO days 15-21, and 10mg PO days 22-28.

Intervention Type DRUG

Tacrolimus

1-5 mg PO, twice a day (BID) days 2-180.

Intervention Type DRUG

Mycophenolate mofetil

500 mg PO, BID days 2-7, 500 mg PO each morning and 1000 mg each night, days 8-14, 1000 mg PO BID days 15-180.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Simulect Solumedrol Deltasone Orasone Prograf Cellcept

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female patients 18-65 years of age.
* ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite as defined by revised El Escorial Criteria.
* Symptom onset ≤ 24 months from screening visit.
* A score of ≥38 on the Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale.
* Slow vital capacity (SVC) measure \>80% of predicted for gender, height and age at screening.
* Subjects must not have taken riluzole for at least 30 days, or be on a stable dose of riluzole for at least 30 days, prior to the screening visit (riluzole-naïve subjects are permitted in the study).
* Negative tuberculosis (TB) test within 3 months of Screening Visit.
* Subjects medically able to undergo lumbar puncture (LP) as determined by the investigator (i.e., no bleeding disorder, allergy to local anesthetics, or a skin infection at or near the LP site).
* Capable of providing informed consent and following study procedures.
* Women must not be able to become pregnant (e.g. post menopausal, surgically sterile, or using adequate birth control methods) for the duration of the study.
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be non-lactating.
* Geographic accessibility to the study site.


* Male or female patients age 18 or older.
* ALS diagnosed as possible, laboratory-supported probable, probable, or definite as defined by revised El Escorial Criteria.
* Symptom onset \>24 months from screening visit.
* Subjects must not have taken riluzole for at least 30 days, or be on a stable dose of riluzole for at least 30 days, prior to the screening visit (riluzole-naïve subjects are permitted in the study).
* Negative tuberculosis (TB) test within 3 months of Screening Visit.
* Subjects medically able to undergo lumbar puncture (LP) as determined by the investigator (i.e., no bleeding disorder, allergy to local anesthetics, or a skin infection at or near the LP site).
* Capable of providing informed consent and following study procedures.
* Geographic accessibility to the study site.
* Women must not be able to become pregnant (e.g. post menopausal, surgically sterile, or using adequate birth control methods) for the duration of the study.
* Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be non-lactating.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior use of basiliximab, solumedrol, prednisone, tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil within 30 days of the Screening Visit.
* Known allergy or sensitivity to basiliximab, solumedrol, prednisone, tacrolimus or mycophenolate mofetil or a formulation of one of these drugs.
* Treatment with an immunosuppressant medication within 30 days of the Screening Visit.
* Active peptic ulcer disease.
* Any medical disorder that would make immunosuppression contraindicated including, but not limited to, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), tuberculosis, or evidence of active cytomegalovirus (CMV) or infection.
* Subjects who have a diaphragm pacing system (DPS).
* Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant in the next 12 months.
* Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
* Use of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (including Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)) for any part of the day or night prior to the Screening Visit (participants with symptom onset within past 24 months only).
* Exposure to any other agent currently under investigation for the treatment of patients with ALS (off-label use or investigational) within 30 days of the Screening Visit.
* Inability to safely complete study activities based on the discretion of the site investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

ALS Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jonathan D. Glass, M.D.

Director, Emory ALS Clinic

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan D Glass, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Christina N Fournier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Massachusetts Medical School

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fournier CN, Schoenfeld D, Berry JD, Cudkowicz ME, Chan J, Quinn C, Brown RH, Salameh JS, Tansey MG, Beers DR, Appel SH, Glass JD. An open label study of a novel immunosuppression intervention for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018 May;19(3-4):242-249. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2017.1421666. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29308669 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.alsconsortium.org/

Northeast ALS Consortium Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIP-ALS-2013

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2013P000981

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB00064218

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id