Trial Outcomes & Findings for Assessment of an Education and Guidance Programme for Eliquis Adherence in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AEGEAN) (NCT NCT01884350)
NCT ID: NCT01884350
Last Updated: 2019-08-19
Results Overview
The mean percentage of days which participants maintained adherence to apixaban treatment was measured for each arm. Adherence to apixaban = number of units of adherence \*100 / total number of eligible days for the time period from first dose date, up to 169 days. Unit of adherence: A 24-hour window where the treatment is taken as prescribed, ie, 1 tablet (5 mg or 2.5 mg, as appropriate) 2 times a day. If only one dose is missed in 24-hours, it is still considered as a unit of adherence. Adherence up to 24 weeks was calculated as the percentage of adherence units within that period. If a participant discontinued from the study before 24 weeks, the denominator time period was censored at the earlier of last dose date or discontinuation date for discontinuation due to reasons unrelated to participant adherence, such as withdrawn consent, or AE; otherwise, the period was censored at the minimum of 169 days and last dose date + 30 days.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
1217 participants
Day 1 up to week 24
2019-08-19
Participant Flow
1217 participants were enrolled, 1162 randomized (583 Primary SOC,579 AEP). 55 were enrolled but not randomized. Of the 55, 13 no longer met study criteria, 13 withdrew consent, 3 lost to follow-up, 10 other and 16 unknown.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC)
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
STARTED
|
583
|
579
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Safety Analysis Set
|
604
|
558
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
529
|
525
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
54
|
54
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
STARTED
|
583
|
263
|
261
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Safety Analysis Set
|
604
|
308
|
223
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
COMPLETED
|
503
|
250
|
250
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
|
80
|
13
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC)
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Subject Withdrew Consent
|
17
|
20
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Death
|
6
|
4
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Serious Adverse Event
|
7
|
6
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
15
|
11
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Drug Interruption >30 Consecutive Days
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Inclusion/exclusion criterion
|
2
|
5
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Helping Hand not used
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Helping Hand not used, treatment taken
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (24 Weeks)
Medical reason
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Subject Withdrew Consent
|
21
|
0
|
2
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Death
|
7
|
3
|
3
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Serious Adverse Event
|
17
|
6
|
3
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Adverse Event
|
17
|
3
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Drug Interruption >30 Consecutive Days
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Helping Hand not used
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Helping Hand not used, treatment taken
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Medical reason
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Subject decision
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Primary Efficacy Analysis Set (48 Weeks)
Inclusion / Exclusion Criterion
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Assessment of an Education and Guidance Programme for Eliquis Adherence in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AEGEAN)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=583 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=579 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Total
n=1162 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
72.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94 • n=5 Participants
|
73.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.05 • n=7 Participants
|
72.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.00 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<64 years
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
77 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
163 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
64-74 years
|
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
220 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
441 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=75 years
|
276 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
282 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
558 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
232 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
234 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
466 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
351 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
345 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
696 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to week 24Population: Primary efficacy analysis set (Week 24), which consists of all randomized participants
The mean percentage of days which participants maintained adherence to apixaban treatment was measured for each arm. Adherence to apixaban = number of units of adherence \*100 / total number of eligible days for the time period from first dose date, up to 169 days. Unit of adherence: A 24-hour window where the treatment is taken as prescribed, ie, 1 tablet (5 mg or 2.5 mg, as appropriate) 2 times a day. If only one dose is missed in 24-hours, it is still considered as a unit of adherence. Adherence up to 24 weeks was calculated as the percentage of adherence units within that period. If a participant discontinued from the study before 24 weeks, the denominator time period was censored at the earlier of last dose date or discontinuation date for discontinuation due to reasons unrelated to participant adherence, such as withdrawn consent, or AE; otherwise, the period was censored at the minimum of 169 days and last dose date + 30 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=583 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=579 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Days With a Correct Execution of the Apixaban Dosing Regimen
|
91.64 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 17.143
|
91.88 percentage of days
Standard Deviation 16.140
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to Week 12, Week 12 to Week 24Population: Primary efficacy analysis set (Week 24) with available data at both study days 85 and 169
The mean adherence to apixaban treatment during the first 24 weeks was measured between the standard of care (SOC) information and Additional Education Program (AEP) arms and expressed as a percentage. Adherence to Apixaban = number of units of adherence \*100 / total number of eligible days for the time period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=583 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=579 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Days With a Correct Execution of the Apixaban Dosing Regimen During the 12 to 24 Weeks Period Compared With During the First 12 Weeks
Day 1 to Week 12
|
93.7 percentage
Standard Deviation 14.18
|
93.0 percentage
Standard Deviation 15.71
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Days With a Correct Execution of the Apixaban Dosing Regimen During the 12 to 24 Weeks Period Compared With During the First 12 Weeks
Week 12 to Week 24
|
90.3 percentage
Standard Deviation 20.64
|
90.9 percentage
Standard Deviation 18.36
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 to Week 48Population: All treated participants in 24 to 48-week period. Participants that had not been using the EMD consistently throughout the study were excluded from the analysis.
The mean percentage of days which participants maintained adherence to apixaban treatment was measured for each arm. Adherence to apixaban = number of units of adherence \*100 / total number of eligible days for the time period from first dose date, up to 169 days. Unit of adherence: A 24-hour window where the treatment is taken as prescribed, ie, 1 tablet (5 mg or 2.5 mg, as appropriate) 2 times a day. If only one dose is missed in 24-hours, it is still considered as a unit of adherence. Adherence over 24 weeks was calculated as the percentage of adherence units within that period. If a participant discontinued from the study before 48 weeks, the denominator time period was censored at the earlier of last dose date or discontinuation date for discontinuation due to reasons unrelated to participant adherence, such as withdrawn consent, or AE; otherwise, the period was censored at the minimum of 169 days and last dose date + 30 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=510 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=253 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
n=254 Participants
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Days With a Correct Execution of the Apixaban Dosing Regimen During the 24 to 48 Weeks Period
|
87.59 percentage
Standard Deviation 22.921
|
88.41 percentage
Standard Deviation 22.148
|
87.51 percentage
Standard Deviation 21.125
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Primary Efficacy Set participants with evaluable data at week 24
Logit analyses were conducted on the Primary Efficacy Set to identify non-adherence predictors of 20% or more (vs. at least 80% adherence) at 24 weeks. In the Primary SOC group, alcohol use, Mini-Mental State Evaluation (MMSE) score, UK standard occupational classification, and type of atrial fibrillation were retained in the model (p-value \<= 0.2). In the Additional Educational Program group, alcohol use, type of atrial fibrillation, age and Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) status were retained in the model (p-value \<= 0.2). Odds ratios are presented for predictors of non-adherence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=557 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=560 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
<=2 Alcoholic Drink/Day Average vs None
|
1.251 Odds ratio
Interval 0.691 to 2.265
|
0.994 Odds ratio
Interval 0.558 to 1.682
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
>=3 Alcoholic Drink/Day Average vs None
|
4.268 Odds ratio
Interval 1.226 to 14.859
|
3.782 Odds ratio
Interval 0.884 to 16.178
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Mini-mental state examination score
|
0.808 Odds ratio
Interval 0.686 to 0.952
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Higher mgmt., adm. and professional jobs vs UKSOC1
|
0.827 Odds ratio
Interval 0.136 to 5.033
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Higher professional occupations vs UKSOC1
|
0.898 Odds ratio
Interval 0.197 to 4.091
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Intermediate occupations vs UKSOC1
|
1.230 Odds ratio
Interval 0.401 to 3.769
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Large employers and mgmt. and adm. jobs vs UKSOC1
|
2.823 Odds ratio
Interval 0.412 to 19.338
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Lower mgmt., adm. and professional jobs vs UKSOC1
|
0.948 Odds ratio
Interval 0.256 to 3.515
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Lower supervisory and tech. occupations vs UKSOC1
|
3.587 Odds ratio
Interval 1.008 to 12.766
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Never worked and long-term unemployed vs UKSOC1
|
1.289 Odds ratio
Interval 0.419 to 3.962
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Routine occupations vs UKSOC1
|
0.508 Odds ratio
Interval 0.181 to 1.425
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Semi-routine occupations vs UKSOC1
|
0.450 Odds ratio
Interval 0.083 to 2.453
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Paroxysmal vs Persistant Atrial Fibrillation
|
1.626 Odds ratio
Interval 0.766 to 3.453
|
1.911 Odds ratio
Interval 0.94 to 3.885
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
Permanent vs Persistant Atrial Fibrillation
|
2.560 Odds ratio
Interval 1.152 to 5.688
|
1.846 Odds ratio
Interval 0.819 to 4.158
|
—
|
|
Non-adherence Predictors of 20% or More (vs. at Least 80% Adherence) at 24 Weeks
VKA Naïve vs Non-Naïve
|
NA Odds ratio
Not retained in model (p-value \> 0.2)
|
1.686 Odds ratio
Interval 0.932 to 3.049
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 up to week 24Population: All randomized participants. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received
AEs with onset date from day 1 through week 24 are included in this summary. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=604 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=558 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
SAE
|
75 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
Drug related AE
|
54 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
AE leading to discontinuation
|
33 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
Death
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24 up to Week 48Population: All randomized participants remaining in the study after week 24. All randomized participants. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received
Adverse events with onset date after 24 weeks are included in this summary. AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Apixaban (Primary SOC Information)
n=604 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received Primary Standard of Care (SOC) information.
|
Apixaban (Additional Educational Program)
n=308 Participants
Participants were treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 48 weeks and received the Additional Educational Program (AEP). After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period, participants in the AEP group were randomized 1:1 to continue receiving AEP or stop receiving AEP and revert to Standard of Care (SOC) information via the Apixaban (Secondary SOC) group.
|
Apixaban (Secondary SOC)
n=223 Participants
Participants were originally in the Apixaban (AEP) arm and treated with Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily and Additional Educational Program (AEP) for the first 24 weeks. After the initial 24-week primary endpoint period participants stopped receiving AEP and were transferred from Apixaban (AEP) arm, stopped the Additional Educational Program (AEP), and switched to the Standard of Care (SOC) information for an additional 24 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
SAE
|
71 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
Drug related AE
|
15 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
AE leading to discontinuation
|
14 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Drug Related Adverse Events (AE), AE Leading to Discontinuation, and Death
Death
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Primary SOC (Period 1)
Continued Additional Educational Program (CAEP) (Period 2)
Secondary SOC (Period 2)
Additional Educational Program (Period 1)
Primary SOC (Period 2)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Primary SOC (Period 1)
n=604 participants at risk
Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 24 weeks and Primary SOC information.
|
Continued Additional Educational Program (CAEP) (Period 2)
n=308 participants at risk
Subjects enrolled in AEP program during the first 24 weeks continued receiving AEP program up to 48 weeks.
|
Secondary SOC (Period 2)
n=223 participants at risk
Subjects who received AEP for 24 weeks then revert to SOC after the second randomization.
|
Additional Educational Program (Period 1)
n=558 participants at risk
Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 24 weeks and Additional Educational Program.
|
Primary SOC (Period 2)
n=604 participants at risk
Subjects who received Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for initial 24 weeks and Primary SOC information continued for a period 48 Weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Aneurysm ruptured
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.65%
2/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Arthroscopic surgery
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Breast conserving surgery
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cancer surgery
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardiac ablation
|
1.3%
8/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.54%
3/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.50%
3/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardiac pacemaker insertion
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardiac pacemaker battery replacement
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardioversion
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Corneal transplant
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Coronary angioplasty
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Coronary artery bypass
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Coronary arterial stent insertion
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Heart valve replacement
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Gastrointestinal endoscopic therapy
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Inguinal hernia repair
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Intervertebral disc operation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Knee arthroplasty
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Joint arthroplasty
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Leg amputation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Lung lobectomy
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Mitral valve replacement
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Percutaneous coronary intervention
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Nephrectomy
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal operation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Scar excision
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Transurethral prostatectomy
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgery
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Varicose vein operation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Vascular graft
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma of colon
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma pancreas
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bronchial carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive lobular breast carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm malignant
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to liver
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Papillary thyroid cancer
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer metastatic
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Thyroid neoplasm
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin cancer
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tongue neoplasm malignant stage
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Social circumstances
Elderly
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.50%
3/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Drug intolerance
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Inflammation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Implant site haematoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Multi-Organ failure
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Sudden death
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Acquired phimosis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast cyst
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Cervical vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chest injury
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.54%
3/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic fracture
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vascular pseudoaneurysm
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspiration breast
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Arteriogram coronary
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Blood test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Biopsy lung
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Cardiac stress test abnormal
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Catheterisation cardiac
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.65%
2/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic valve disease
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.2%
7/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
1.8%
10/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.50%
3/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradyarrhythmia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
1.5%
9/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.97%
3/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
2.3%
13/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.66%
4/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac flutter
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac valve disease
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular failure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve incompetence
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.90%
2/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular fibrillation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.65%
2/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.90%
2/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.72%
4/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemothorax
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Status asthmaticus
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypochromic anaemia
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypofibrinogenaemia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Spontaneous haematoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Basal ganglia infarction
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haematoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Haemorrhage intracranial
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Parkinson's disease
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypertonia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post stroke seizure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Multiple sclerosis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radicular syndrome
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.50%
3/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal wall haematoma
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Barrett's oesophagus
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine perforation
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal polyp
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis haemorrhagic
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal disorder
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urethral stenosis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic lesion
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Diabetic foot
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mobility decreased
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.36%
2/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diabetic gangrene
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.45%
1/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Helicobacter gastritis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways disease
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.65%
2/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.83%
5/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.90%
2/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.54%
3/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.33%
2/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Streptococcal endocarditis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vestibular neuronitis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.18%
1/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.17%
1/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive cardiomyopathy
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.32%
1/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
0.00%
0/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Primary SOC (Period 1)
n=604 participants at risk
Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 24 weeks and Primary SOC information.
|
Continued Additional Educational Program (CAEP) (Period 2)
n=308 participants at risk
Subjects enrolled in AEP program during the first 24 weeks continued receiving AEP program up to 48 weeks.
|
Secondary SOC (Period 2)
n=223 participants at risk
Subjects who received AEP for 24 weeks then revert to SOC after the second randomization.
|
Additional Educational Program (Period 1)
n=558 participants at risk
Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for 24 weeks and Additional Educational Program.
|
Primary SOC (Period 2)
n=604 participants at risk
Subjects who received Apixaban 2.5 mg or 5 mg by mouth twice daily for initial 24 weeks and Primary SOC information continued for a period 48 Weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
6.6%
40/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
1.6%
5/308 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
2.2%
5/223 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
8.2%
46/558 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
3.5%
21/604 • From date of first dose to date of last dose plus 30 days
All randomized participants were analyzed. Participants in the safety analysis set were categorized according to the counseling actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. agreements with investigators vary; constant is our right to embargo communications regarding trial results prior to public release for a period ≤60 days from submittal for review. We will not prohibit investigators from publishing, but will prohibit the disclosure of previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results, and request postponement of single-center publications until after disclosure of the clinical trial's primary publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER