A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Piracetam on Aphasia After Acute Ischemic Cerebral Artery Stroke

NCT ID: NCT01883011

Last Updated: 2013-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

571 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-08-31

Study Completion Date

2001-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to confirm the efficacy of piracetam after 12 weeks of treatment on the aphasic status of subjects suffering from aphasia after acute ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke and having received their medication within 7 h post-stroke onset.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An interim analysis was performed, as planned in the protocol, on the primary efficacy measure (Day 84 FAST Score) for aphasic subjects. This interim analysis indicated that there was less than a 20 % chance of showing a 15 % difference between placebo and piracetam at the end of the trial, under the assumption that there was indeed a 15 % difference. Thus, it was the decision of UCB to stop further recruitment into this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Ischaemic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Piracetam Stroke Aphasia Acute Cerebral Ischemic Nootropil

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Piracetam

IV infusion 12 g piracetam in 60 ml

IV Ampoules 3 g piracetam in 15 ml

Oral solution 33 % piracetam (bottle of 125 ml)

Oral tablets 1200 mg piracetam (blisters of 10 tablets)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Piracetam

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

IV infusion 12 g placebo in 60 ml

IV Ampoules 3 g placebo in 15 ml

Oral solution 33% placebo (bottle of 125 ml)

Oral tablets 1200 mg placebo (blisters of 10 tablets)

All IV forms were identical in presentation, size and color to allow a double blind design.

All oral forms were identical in shape, size, color and taste to allow a double blind design.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Piracetam

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female adults ≥ 50 years
* Considered as reliable and mentally capable of adhering to the protocol
* Signed informed consent (by the subject or the next of kin) or inclusion of the subject as per Ethics Committee approved procedures
* Clinical diagnosis of a middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke
* A disabling motor deficit at the moment of inclusion, defined as having a total Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) score between 15 and 65
* Treated before 7 h (6 h and 59 minutes) after the estimated stroke onset
* If the subject had a stroke during the night, the onset of stroke is assumed to be the last time the subject was seen awake and normal, or last time the subject remembered he/she was awake and normal
* Being aphasic, defined as having an Aphasia Severity Rating (ASR) score of \< 3

Exclusion Criteria

* Stupor or coma: \< 10 on the item consciousness of the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) scale
* A previous stroke with clinical sequel or a previous stroke with aphasia (even in case of complete recovery from aphasia)
* A medical or neurological disease interfering with the assessments and causing a clear deficit:
* 1\. in functional ability or autonomy
* 2\. in motor function
* 3\. in cognitive capacities
* 4\. in language
* A systemic disease with neurological symptoms
* A life threatening disease with life expectancy of less than 1 year
* Renal insufficiency (creatinine \> 2 mg/100 ml or \> 180 µmol/l; creatinine had to be determined as soon as possible but not before inclusion)
* Any concomitant treatments that could not be stopped at the moment of inclusion or that had been started after the onset of the stroke and before inclusion (as long as not considered by the advisory board as effective drug), such as:
* 1\. Cerebro-vascular active products: bufenine, buflomedil, cinnarizine, codergocrinemesilate, citicholine, cyclandelate, cyprodemanol, deanolacetamidobenzoate, flunarizine, ginkgo-biloba extr., inositolnicotinate, isoxsuprine, meclofenoxate, naftidrofuryloxalate, nicergoline, nicotinic acid (smoking is allowed), nimodipine, pentifylline, papaverine, pentoxifylline, piracetam, pyrisuccideanoldimaleate, pyritinol, raubasine, vincamine, viquidil, xantinolnicotinate. A list of these drugs with generic and brand name, adapted to each of the participating countries accompanied the Case Report Form (CRF)
* 2\. Thrombolytics: recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (alteplase) (rt- PA), streptokinase, urokinase, ancrod
* 3\. Hemodilution
* 4\. Glucose infusion \>5 %
* Subjects known to not being able to be followed for 12 weeks
* Known alcohol or drug addiction or abuse
* Subjects previously enrolled in this trial
* Known allergy/intolerance to piracetam/excipients
* Lactation, pregnancy, or pregnancy potential, unless using an effective means of contraception
* Illiterate subjects (subjects not able to read prior to stroke)
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

UCB S.A. - Pharma Sector

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

UCB Clinical Trial Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

+1 877 822 9493

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

050

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

051

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

004

Inssbruck, , Austria

Site Status

001

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

003

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

102

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

103

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

104

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

107

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

150

Charleville-Mézières, , France

Site Status

152

Nice, , France

Site Status

201

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

200

Minden, , Germany

Site Status

203

Nidda-bad-Salzhausen, , Germany

Site Status

202

Saarbrücken, , Germany

Site Status

251

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

252

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

302

Budapest, , Greece

Site Status

303

Budapest, , Greece

Site Status

305

Budapest, , Greece

Site Status

250

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

300

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

304

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

301

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

350

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

750

Bergen, , Norway

Site Status

455

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

454

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

456

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

451

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

450

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

452

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

600

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

601

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

501

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

502

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

503

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

500

Terrassa, , Spain

Site Status

550

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

700

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

654

Edirne, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

650

Eskişehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

652

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

653

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina Austria Belgium France Germany Greece Hungary Italy Norway Poland Singapore Spain Sweden Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

N09642

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id