The Effect of Pollen Season on Subcutaneous Allergen Immunotherapy Reactions

NCT ID: NCT01878929

Last Updated: 2013-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

245 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is a widely used and effective treatment modality for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. SCIT starts with a build-up phase during which a patient receives frequent, escalating doses of the allergens they are allergic to until they reach a predetermined maintenance dose. This is followed by a maintenance phase during which the allergen dose is kept constant and administered at greater intervals. Maximum clinical improvement is generally not seen until a patient is in the maintenance phase. Anecdotal evidence of possible reactions to SCIT administered during a patient's pollen season has led to dosage freezes during a patient's pollen season which extends the length of the build-up phase by many months. Prolonging the buildup phase increases the time required to obtain maximal benefit from SCIT, and at the same time, can decrease patient compliance with therapy due to the prolonged period of time when frequent injections are required.

The aims of this study are to determine if adverse reactions to pollen SCIT are increased if doses are increased during pollen season.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) is a widely used and effective treatment modality for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma. SCIT starts with a build-up phase during which a patient receives frequent, escalating doses of the allergens they are allergic to until they reach a predetermined maintenance dose. This is followed by a maintenance phase during which the allergen dose is kept constant and administered at greater intervals. Maximum clinical improvement is generally not seen until a patient is in the maintenance phase. Anecdotal evidence of possible reactions to SCIT administered during a patient's pollen season has led to dosage freezes during a patient's pollen season which extends the length of the build-up phase by many months. Prolonging the buildup phase increases the time required to obtain maximal benefit from SCIT, and at the same time, can decrease patient compliance with therapy due to the prolonged period of time when frequent injections are required.

The aims of this study are to determine if adverse reactions to pollen SCIT are increased if doses are increased during pollen season.

Specific Aim 1: To determine if escalating pollen SCIT doses during the pollen season is associated with an increased rate of immediate reactions in comparison to holding SCIT doses constant.

Hypothesis: There will not be an increased rate of immediate reactions to SCIT in build up phase received during the pollen season in comparison to SCIT held for pollen season.

Strategy: In a prospective trial, 245 subjects will be randomized to receive monthly (doses held constant) or weekly (doses built up) injections. Rate of immediate local and systemic reactions per injection will be compared between the two groups.

Specific Aim 2: To determine if escalating pollen SCIT doses during the pollen season is associated with an increased rate of delayed reactions in comparison to holding SCIT doses constant.

Hypothesis: There will not be an increased rate of delayed reactions to SCIT in build up phase received during the pollen season in comparison to SCIT held for pollen season.

Strategy: In a prospective trial, 245 subjects will be randomized to receive monthly (doses held constant) or weekly (doses built up) injections. Rate of delayed reactions per injection will be compared between the two groups.

BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE

Immunotherapy is one of the most effective therapies for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, but the protocol dosing during pollen season is based on limited data. Immunotherapy is given in increasing dosage during the build up phase in order to build tolerance. After the build up phase, there is a maintenance phase that is used for the remainder of therapy. At this time, there is little data to support the common practice of not increasing the dosage of immunotherapy during pollen seasons.

The recent allergen immunotherapy practice parameter references 2 articles that have noted no increased systemic reactions to SCIT during pollen season. , In one prospective study, it was concluded that there was no direct correlation of reactions to SCIT and pollen season.3 They did note a correlation between the mean monthly mold counts in August to October and the rate of systemic reactions. The other study referenced is a prospective study which did not observe a statistically significant difference in the rate of systemic reactions to grass or ragweed pollen during their respective pollen seasons.4 However, the conclusions of these studies are conflicted by another study which consists of surveys retrospectively sent to members of the American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology. The surveys in this study identified 46% of near fatal reactions to SCIT as occurring during peak allergy season. Though the immunotherapy standard parameters are not defining pollen season as a contraindication, we will consider it more that minimal risk for this study.

It is still common practice to stop the buildup phase and not escalate SCIT dosing during pollen season due to the conflicting available data and limitations in study design of many of the studies (retrospective, questionnaire based). A further look into SCIT dosing during pollen season will allow for more standardized practice and potentially improved patient outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergic Rhinitis Asthma Allergic Conjunctivitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds) -Held

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds)-Held

Weekly administration of Greer manufactured allergen extract at same dose and concentration patient was on prior to allergen season for the duration of patients allergen season.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds)

Intervention Type DRUG

Greer is manufacture of all allergen extract used in this study.

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds) -Build-up

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds) -Build-up

Weekly administration of Greer manufactured allergen extract at escalating dose and concentration patient for the duration of patients allergen season.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds)

Intervention Type DRUG

Greer is manufacture of all allergen extract used in this study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Allergen(Tree, Grass, Weeds)

Greer is manufacture of all allergen extract used in this study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

"Greer Grass Extract" "Greer Tree Extract" "Greer Ragweed Extract" "Greer Weed Extract" "Greer Tree and Ragweed Extract" "Greer Grass and Ragweed Extract" "Greer Weed and Ragweed Extract" "Greer Tree and Grass Extract" "Greer Weed and Grass Extract" "Greer Weed and Tree Extract" "Greer Tree and Grass and Ragweed Extract" "Greer Grass and Ragweed and Weed Extract" "Greer Tree and Ragweed and Weed Extract" "Greer Tree and Grass and Weed Extract" "Greer Tree and Grass and Ragweed and Weed Extract"

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* include individuals ages 5 and greater at Allergy/Immunology Associates, Inc., who are receiving build-up SCIT to tree, grass, and/or weed pollens for allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, and/or asthma

Exclusion Criteria

1. are in maintenance phase of SCIT
2. are on beta-blockers
3. have a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of less than 70% of predicted
4. have a history of anaphylaxis with previous SCIT to aeroallergens (as defined by the requirement of intramuscular or subcutaneous epinephrine for treatment of a SCIT-induced reaction)
5. have any uncontrolled cardiac or pulmonary disease as determined by their treating allergist/immunologist
6. are pregnant, due to risk of harm to fetus if anaphylaxis occurs.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Devi Jhaveri

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Devi K Jhaveri, D.O.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Haig Tcheurekdjian, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Allergy/Immunology Associates Inc.

South Euclid, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Devi K Jhaveri, D.O.

Role: CONTACT

2163813333

Haig Tcheurekdjian, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

2163813333

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Haig Tcheurekdjian, M.D.

Role: primary

216-381-3333

Devi Jhaveri, D.O.

Role: backup

2163813333

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

02-13-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.