Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study (NCT NCT01877668)
NCT ID: NCT01877668
Last Updated: 2017-07-06
Results Overview
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire - disability index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
422 participants
At end of Month 3
2017-07-06
Participant Flow
Of 611 participants screened for entry into the study, 422 received treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
107
|
104
|
106
|
52
|
53
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
96
|
96
|
94
|
44
|
43
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
8
|
12
|
8
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
No longer met study criteria
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Insufficient clinical response
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse event related to study drug
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse event unrelated to study drug
|
4
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy And Safety Of Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparator Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Total
n=422 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
49.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=5 Participants
|
46.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=7 Participants
|
47.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
|
46.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=4 Participants
|
49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 • n=21 Participants
|
47.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
197 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug.
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, health assessment questionnaire - disability index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20): Month 3
|
50.47 Percentage or participants
|
60.58 Percentage or participants
|
51.89 Percentage or participants
|
33.33 Percentage or participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
|
-0.3499 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04665
|
-0.3998 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04716
|
-0.3808 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04767
|
-0.1802 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05031
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Month 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a joint space narrowing (JSN) score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=98 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=99 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=95 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=45 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Van Der Heijdel Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) for Psoriatic Arthritis
|
0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.067
|
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.069
|
0.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.094
|
0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.099
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Month 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Assessment of joint damage includes a joint erosion score (range 0-320) and a JSN score (range 0-208). The mTSS is the sum of the erosion and JSN scores (range 0-528). A higher score indicates more severe disease status. If a component score is missing, the mTSS will be missing. Progressor is defined as an increase in mTSS \>0.5 from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=98 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=99 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=95 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=45 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Progressed Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 12
|
4.08 Percentage of participants
|
5.05 Percentage of participants
|
2.11 Percentage of participants
|
4.17 Percentage of participants
|
8.89 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=number of responders.
ACR50 was calculated as a ≥50% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 2 (n=23, 34, 24, NA, NA, 8)
|
21.50 Percentage of participants
|
32.69 Percentage of participants
|
22.64 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
7.62 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 1 (n=13, 20,12, NA, NA, 5)
|
12.15 Percentage of participants
|
19.23 Percentage of participants
|
11.32 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Week 2 (n=7, 7, 5, NA, NA, 1)
|
6.54 Percentage of participants
|
6.73 Percentage of participants
|
4.72 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
0.95 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 3 (n=30, 42, 35, NA, NA, 10)
|
28.04 Percentage of participants
|
40.38 Percentage of participants
|
33.02 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
9.52 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 4 (n=38, 39, 34, 11, 17, NA)
|
35.51 Percentage of participants
|
37.50 Percentage of participants
|
32.08 Percentage of participants
|
21.15 Percentage of participants
|
32.08 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 6 (n=41, 48, 45, 17, 14, NA)
|
38.32 Percentage of participants
|
46.15 Percentage of participants
|
42.45 Percentage of participants
|
32.69 Percentage of participants
|
26.42 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 9 (n=45, 48, 49, 22, 23, NA)
|
42.06 Percentage of participants
|
46.15 Percentage of participants
|
46.23 Percentage of participants
|
42.31 Percentage of participants
|
43.40 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 12 (n=48, 50, 43, 21, 19, NA)
|
44.86 Percentage of participants
|
48.08 Percentage of participants
|
40.57 Percentage of participants
|
40.38 Percentage of participants
|
35.85 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=number of responders.
ACR70 was calculated as a ≥70% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. .
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 9 (n=21, 31, 30, 15, 12, NA)
|
19.63 Percentage of participants
|
29.81 Percentage of participants
|
28.30 Percentage of participants
|
28.85 Percentage of participants
|
22.64 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Week 2 (n=0, 3, 1, NA, NA, 0)
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
|
2.88 Percentage of participants
|
0.94 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
0.00 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 1 (n=5, 8, 4, NA, NA, 1)
|
4.67 Percentage of participants
|
7.69 Percentage of participants
|
3.77 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
0.95 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 2 (n=10, 14, 13, NA, NA, 2)
|
9.35 Percentage of participants
|
13.46 Percentage of participants
|
12.26 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
1.90 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 3 (n=18, 15, 20, NA, NA, 5)
|
16.82 Percentage of participants
|
14.42 Percentage of participants
|
18.87 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
4.76 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 4 (n=24, 23, 21, 7, 8, NA)
|
22.43 Percentage of participants
|
22.12 Percentage of participants
|
19.81 Percentage of participants
|
13.46 Percentage of participants
|
15.09 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 6 (n=19, 33, 32, 10, 7, NA)
|
17.76 Percentage of participants
|
31.73 Percentage of participants
|
30.19 Percentage of participants
|
19.23 Percentage of participants
|
13.21 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 12 (n=25, 32, 31, 12, 12, NA)
|
23.36 Percentage of participants
|
30.77 Percentage of participants
|
29.25 Percentage of participants
|
23.08 Percentage of participants
|
22.64 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=number of responders.
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 9 (n=73, 76, 73, 35, 37, NA)
|
68.22 Percentage of participants
|
73.08 Percentage of participants
|
68.87 Percentage of participants
|
67.31 Percentage of participants
|
69.81 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 12 (n=73, 73, 64, 35, 31, NA)
|
68.22 Percentage of participants
|
70.19 Percentage of participants
|
60.38 Percentage of participants
|
67.31 Percentage of participants
|
58.49 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Week 2 (n=24, 33, 23, NA, NA, 6)
|
22.43 Percentage of participants
|
31.73 Percentage of participants
|
21.70 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
5.71 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 1 (n=37, 50, 30, NA, NA, 11)
|
34.58 Percentage of participants
|
48.08 Percentage of participants
|
28.30 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
10.48 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 2 (n=47, 57, 62, NA, NA, 28)
|
43.93 Percentage of participants
|
54.81 Percentage of participants
|
58.49 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
26.67 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 4 (n=65, 60, 61, 27, 28, NA)
|
60.75 Percentage of participants
|
57.69 Percentage of participants
|
57.55 Percentage of participants
|
51.92 Percentage of participants
|
52.83 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥20% (ACR20) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 6 (n=63, 70, 68, 31, 30, NA)
|
58.88 Percentage of participants
|
67.31 Percentage of participants
|
64.15 Percentage of participants
|
59.62 Percentage of participants
|
56.60 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a participant has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 2 (n=104, 104, 104, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.2713 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04626
|
-0.4009 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04678
|
-0.3736 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04719
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.1682 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04998
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 4 (n=102, 100, 102, 50, 50, NA)
|
-0.4231 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04982
|
-0.4407 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05039
|
-0.3643 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05069
|
-0.2850 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07075
|
-0.3302 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07128
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
-0.4471 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05136
|
-0.4611 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05179
|
-0.4259 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05227
|
-0.3142 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07315
|
-0.3841 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07369
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 9 (n=99, 96, 96, 47, 45, NA)
|
-0.5119 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05038
|
-0.4847 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05096
|
-0.4304 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05143
|
-0.3843 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07185
|
-0.4839 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07276
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
-0.5391 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05324
|
-0.5104 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05365
|
-0.4478 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05426
|
-0.4104 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07646
|
-0.4569 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07704
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Week 2 (n=106, 102, 103, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.1842 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04131
|
-0.2089 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04208
|
-0.2129 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04246
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.0837 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04549
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.2048 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04363
|
-0.2676 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04426
|
-0.3028 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04465
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.1224 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04755
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein Levels
|
-5.5981 mg/L
Standard Error 0.80656
|
-6.6004 mg/L
Standard Error 0.80822
|
-7.8955 mg/L
Standard Error 0.82547
|
-0.8643 mg/L
Standard Error 0.86304
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain
|
-21.49 mm
Standard Error 2.325
|
-27.10 mm
Standard Error 2.342
|
-21.87 mm
Standard Error 2.389
|
-10.22 mm
Standard Error 2.499
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Participant answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis
|
-20.08 mm
Standard Error 2.275
|
-25.50 mm
Standard Error 2.291
|
-21.47 mm
Standard Error 2.328
|
-11.40 mm
Standard Error 2.439
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=103 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis
|
-27.44 mm
Standard Error 1.998
|
-33.74 mm
Standard Error 2.021
|
-29.02 mm
Standard Error 2.043
|
-22.26 mm
Standard Error 2.121
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count
|
-6.5 Joints
Standard Error 0.58
|
-7.6 Joints
Standard Error 0.58
|
-6.5 Joints
Standard Error 0.59
|
-4.8 Joints
Standard Error 0.62
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to end of Month 3Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable.
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count
|
-8.7 Joints
Standard Error 1.04
|
-11.0 Joints
Standard Error 1.05
|
-7.6 Joints
Standard Error 1.07
|
-6.9 Joints
Standard Error 1.10
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug. n=number of responders.
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender/painful joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: ≥20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥30% improvement in tender joint count; and ≥30% improvement in swollen joint count.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=105 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Week 2 (n=34, 42, 23, NA, NA, 10)
|
31.78 Percentage of participants
|
40.38 Percentage of participants
|
21.70 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
9.52 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 1 (n=45, 51, 43, NA, NA, 23)
|
42.06 Percentage of participants
|
49.04 Percentage of participants
|
40.57 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
21.90 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 2 (n=54, 69, 62, NA, NA, 36)
|
50.47 Percentage of participants
|
66.35 Percentage of participants
|
58.49 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
34.29 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 3 (n=55, 73, 65, NA, NA, 47)
|
51.40 Percentage of participants
|
70.19 Percentage of participants
|
61.32 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
44.76 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 4 (n=68, 68, 71, 32, 30, NA)
|
63.55 Percentage of participants
|
65.38 Percentage of participants
|
66.98 Percentage of participants
|
61.54 Percentage of participants
|
56.60 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 6 (n=61, 75, 71, 35, 35, NA)
|
57.01 Percentage of participants
|
72.12 Percentage of participants
|
66.98 Percentage of participants
|
67.31 Percentage of participants
|
66.04 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 9 (n=75, 73, 71, 36, 37, NA)
|
70.09 Percentage of participants
|
70.19 Percentage of participants
|
66.98 Percentage of participants
|
69.23 Percentage of participants
|
69.81 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12
Month 12 (n=69, 76, 69, 39, 33, NA)
|
64.49 Percentage of participants
|
73.08 Percentage of participants
|
65.09 Percentage of participants
|
75.00 Percentage of participants
|
62.26 Percentage of participants
|
NA Percentage of participants
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug with baseline PGA-PsO\>0 and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine a PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=101 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=98 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=102 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=50 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=100 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Month 1 (n=100, 96, 100, NA, NA, 99)
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Month 3 (n=98, 97, 98, NA, NA, 98)
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Month 6 (n=96, 94, 96, 46, 46, NA)
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Month 9 (n=95, 91, 94, 45, 44, NA)
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response
Month 12 (n=91, 90, 92, 41, 43, NA)
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
-0.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug with PASI\>0 and BSA ≥3% at baseline. n=number of responders.
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity \& percentage body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, \& scaling, evaluated separately for head \& neck, upper limbs, trunk, \& lower limbs \& rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis \& is assigned a score: 0=no involvement; 1=0-9%; 2=10-29%; 3=30-49%; 4=50-69%; 5=70-89%; 6=90-100%. In each area, sum of severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of numbers obtained for the 4 body areas is the PASI score \& can vary in increments of 0.1 \& range from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=82 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=70 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=77 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=42 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=40 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=82 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Month 1 (n=19, 19, 11, NA, NA, 4)
|
23.17 Percentage of participants
4.66
|
27.14 Percentage of participants
5.32
|
14.29 Percentage of participants
3.99
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
4.88 Percentage of participants
2.38
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Month 3 (n=35, 31, 30, NA, NA, 12)
|
42.68 Percentage of participants
5.46
|
44.29 Percentage of participants
5.94
|
38.96 Percentage of participants
5.56
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
14.63 Percentage of participants
3.90
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Month 6 (n=38, 42, 42, 12, 17, NA)
|
46.34 Percentage of participants
5.51
|
60.00 Percentage of participants
5.86
|
54.55 Percentage of participants
5.67
|
28.57 Percentage of participants
6.97
|
42.50 Percentage of participants
7.82
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Month 9 (n=36, 48, 45, 14, 20, NA)
|
43.90 Percentage of participants
5.448
|
68.57 Percentage of participants
5.55
|
58.44 Percentage of participants
5.62
|
33.33 Percentage of participants
7.27
|
50.00 Percentage of participants
7.91
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Month 12 (n=46, 47, 43, 15, 21, NA)
|
56.10 Percentage of participants
5.48
|
67.14 Percentage of participants
5.61
|
55.84 Percentage of participants
5.66
|
35.71 Percentage of participants
7.39
|
52.50 Percentage of participants
7.90
|
NA Percentage of participants
NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug with baseline DSS\>0 and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=no tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a patient is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=60 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=60 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=58 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=28 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Month 3 (n=58, 60 , 56, NA, NA, 55)
|
-3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
-5.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
-4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-2.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Month 1 (n=58, 59, 56, NA, NA, 56)
|
-1.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
-3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
-2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
0.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Month 6 (n=58, 59, 55, 28, 25, NA)
|
-5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.01
|
-6.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.99
|
-5.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.03
|
-5.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.45
|
-5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.50
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Month 9 (n=57, 59, 53, 27, 25, NA)
|
-7.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
-7.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
-6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
-5.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
-7.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS)
Month 12 (n=54, 58, 52, 26, 24, NA)
|
-7.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.65
|
-7.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.62
|
-6.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.67
|
-6.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.93
|
-7.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug with baseline SPARCC Enthesitis Score\>0 and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=80 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=81 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=82 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=41 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Month 1 (n=79, 80, 80, NA, NA, 78)
|
-0.83 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.317
|
-1.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.321
|
-0.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.336
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-0.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.355
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Month 3 (n=77, 79, 79, NA, NA, 78)
|
-1.84 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.363
|
-2.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.364
|
-1.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.375
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-1.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.393
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Month 6 (n=76, 78, 76, 33, 39, NA)
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-2.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.34
|
-2.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
-2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.50
|
-2.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Month 9 (n=75, 75, 73, 34, 37, NA)
|
-2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
-2.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
-3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index
Month 12 (n=72, 73, 72, 31, 37, NA)
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-3.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
|
-2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
-2.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
-3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.46
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug with baseline LEI\>0 and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for an total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=74 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=64 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=76 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=31 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=34 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Month 1 (n=74, 63, 75, NA, NA, 65)
|
-0.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.192
|
-0.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.213
|
-0.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.203
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-0.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.219
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Month 3 (n=70, 63, 73, NA, NA, 63)
|
-0.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.221
|
-1.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.240
|
-1.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.228
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
-0.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.246
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Month 6 (n=72, 61, 71, 27, 31, NA)
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
|
-1.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Month 9 (n=70, 58, 68, 27, 29, NA)
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
|
-1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
|
-1.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI)
Month 12 (n=67, 56, 67, 24, 29, NA)
|
-1.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
|
-1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
|
-1.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
|
-1.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a standard deviation (SD) of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
3.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.638
|
4.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.645
|
4.00 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.655
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
1.54 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.700
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Month 3 (n=102, 103,100, NA, NA, 102)
|
5.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.733
|
5.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.735
|
6.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.748
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
2.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.785
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 98, 48, 48, NA)
|
6.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.773
|
6.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.777
|
6.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.788
|
5.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.101
|
6.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.112
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 95, 47, 46, NA)
|
7.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.781
|
7.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.787
|
6.91 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.798
|
6.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.115
|
7.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.130
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute, Physical Component Summary Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 43, NA)
|
7.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.806
|
7.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.810
|
6.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.822
|
5.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.160
|
5.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.177
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104,NA, NA, 103)
|
4.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.841
|
3.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.849
|
2.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.871
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
3.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.917
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Month 3 (n=102, 103,100, NA, NA, 102)
|
4.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.909
|
4.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.909
|
3.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.938
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
3.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.976
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 98, 48, 48, NA)
|
5.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.927
|
5.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.930
|
4.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.955
|
4.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.319
|
3.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.331
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 95, 47, 46, NA)
|
5.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.974
|
6.20 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.982
|
3.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.005
|
4.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.391
|
6.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.409
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute, Mental Component Summary Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 43, NA)
|
4.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.012
|
6.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.016
|
4.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.039
|
4.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.455
|
4.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.474
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
2.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.768
|
3.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.776
|
2.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.787
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.840
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103,101, NA, NA, 102)
|
5.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.846
|
5.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.848
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.862
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.910
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
7.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.897
|
6.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.900
|
6.36 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.912
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.276
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.291
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
7.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.902
|
6.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.909
|
7.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.921
|
5.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.285
|
6.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.306
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Physical Functioning Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
7.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.899
|
7.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.903
|
6.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.917
|
6.49 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.292
|
4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.308
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
4.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.751
|
3.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.759
|
4.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.770
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.820
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 100, NA, NA, 102)
|
4.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.801
|
4.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.803
|
5.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.820
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.862
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
6.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.824
|
5.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.828
|
5.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.840
|
4.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.172
|
5.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.185
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
6.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.853
|
6.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.861
|
5.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.872
|
4.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.217
|
6.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.234
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Physical Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
6.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.888
|
7.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.892
|
6.37 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.906
|
2.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.279
|
5.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.291
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
5.53 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.777
|
7.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.786
|
6.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.802
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.851
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
7.75 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.838
|
8.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.840
|
7.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.859
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.903
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
7.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.985
|
10.65 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.989
|
7.76 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.004
|
8.55 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.405
|
8.98 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.425
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
9.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.953
|
10.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.960
|
8.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.977
|
8.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.362
|
10.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.389
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Bodily Pain Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 43, NA)
|
9.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.961
|
11.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.965
|
9.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.984
|
8.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.384
|
8.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.413
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
3.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.610
|
3.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.616
|
1.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.625
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.666
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103,101, NA, NA, 102 )
|
4.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.700
|
3.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.701
|
4.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.713
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.748
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
5.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.720
|
4.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.722
|
4.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.733
|
4.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.022
|
3.92 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.033
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
5.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.773
|
5.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.778
|
4.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.788
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.102
|
4.85 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.117
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: General Health Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
5.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.811
|
4.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.815
|
4.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.825
|
4.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.164
|
4.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.175
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
3.64 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.802
|
4.59 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.806
|
2.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.826
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.877
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
5.50 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.889
|
5.90 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.887
|
4.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.909
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.954
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
6.81 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.969
|
7.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.970
|
5.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.989
|
5.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.378
|
4.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.394
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
6.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.017
|
7.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.023
|
5.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.041
|
6.61 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.451
|
6.39 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.472
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Vitality Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
7.01 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.022
|
7.02 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.024
|
5.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.043
|
5.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.465
|
5.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.481
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number pf participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
5.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.897
|
5.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.898
|
5.26 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.918
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.63 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.961
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
4.51 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.827
|
4.46 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.838
|
3.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.852
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.96 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.901
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
6.97 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.955
|
7.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.959
|
7.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.975
|
5.44 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.362
|
6.05 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.373
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
7.66 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.947
|
7.74 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.957
|
5.69 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.972
|
5.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.355
|
8.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.373
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Social Functioning Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
6.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.989
|
8.42 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.995
|
6.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.012
|
6.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.427
|
6.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.445
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103,104, NA, NA, 103)
|
4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.960
|
3.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.971
|
2.93 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.991
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
4.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.042
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 100, NA, NA, 102)
|
4.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.010
|
4.82 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.011
|
3.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.040
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
3.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.083
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 98, 48, 48, NA)
|
5.67 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.024
|
4.68 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.027
|
4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.051
|
6.34 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.458
|
4.56 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.473
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 95, 47, 46, NA)
|
5.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.021
|
6.13 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.030
|
4.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.052
|
5.89 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.456
|
6.52 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.478
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Role-Emotional Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
5.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.048
|
6.73 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.053
|
6.03 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.075
|
4.77 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.509
|
4.94 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.525
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. An additional item measures health transition. The 8 health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Norm-based domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses; each of which has a population mean of 50 with a SD of 10 points, and ranges from minus infinity to plus infinity. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
3.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.867
|
3.87 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.874
|
2.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.895
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.952
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Month 3 (n=102, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
4.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.934
|
4.23 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.932
|
3.95 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.956
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.009
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
6.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.951
|
6.38 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.953
|
5.35 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.974
|
3.70 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.354
|
3.41 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.372
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
5.79 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.022
|
6.43 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.028
|
4.62 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.048
|
3.57 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.461
|
5.45 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.483
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2), Acute Components: Mental Health Domain
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
5.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.019
|
6.58 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.022
|
5.86 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.044
|
4.72 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.467
|
4.48 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.483
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Month 3 (n=101, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.048
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.050
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.07 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.042
|
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.043
|
-0.15 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.043
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.10 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44,44, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=103 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Month 1 (n=105, 102, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.046
|
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.16 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.09 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.050
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Month 3 (n=101, 102, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.11 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
-0.18 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.048
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.12 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.051
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Month 6 (n=100, 99, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-care
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=103 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Month 1 (n=105, 102, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.043
|
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.043
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.06 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Month 6 (n=100, 99, 99, 48, 47, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Month 3 (n=101, 102, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.24 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
-0.29 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.049
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.14 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.039
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.040
|
-0.19 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.040
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.043
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Month 3 (n=101, 103, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.28 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.045
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.08 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.047
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.051
|
-0.22 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.052
|
-0.27 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.053
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Month 3 (n=101, 103, 100, NA, NA, 102)
|
-0.25 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
-0.17 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.055
|
-0.32 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.056
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-0.21 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.059
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
|
-0.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
-0.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems \[1\], some or moderate problems \[2\], or extreme problems \[3\]) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state) visual analogue scale (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state; higher scores indicate a better health state, with a higher value representing better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
10.75 mm
Standard Error 1.859
|
10.81 mm
Standard Error 1.880
|
10.27 mm
Standard Error 1.917
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
6.59 mm
Standard Error 2.027
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Month 3 (n=101, 103, 101, NA, NA, 101)
|
14.00 mm
Standard Error 2.100
|
15.83 mm
Standard Error 2.092
|
13.10 mm
Standard Error 2.138
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
6.37 mm
Standard Error 2.242
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99, 48, 48, NA)
|
19.5 mm
Standard Error 2.08
|
15.7 mm
Standard Error 2.09
|
15.5 mm
Standard Error 2.12
|
14.7 mm
Standard Error 2.97
|
16.6 mm
Standard Error 3.00
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
19.2 mm
Standard Error 2.21
|
15.9 mm
Standard Error 2.23
|
18.2 mm
Standard Error 2.26
|
12.8 mm
Standard Error 3.16
|
21.5 mm
Standard Error 3.21
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
20.7 mm
Standard Error 2.09
|
19.8 mm
Standard Error 2.09
|
16.5 mm
Standard Error 2.14
|
16.0 mm
Standard Error 3.02
|
19.8 mm
Standard Error 3.05
|
NA mm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item scored on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0 to 52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Month 3 (102, 102, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
7.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.85
|
6.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.85
|
6.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.87
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
5.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.77
|
4.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
4.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.79
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99,48, 48, NA)
|
7.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
8.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.89
|
6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.91
|
6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.26
|
7.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.28
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
7.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
7.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.92
|
6.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.94
|
5.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.31
|
8.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.33
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
8.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
8.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.95
|
6.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.97
|
5.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.36
|
7.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 1.38
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
3.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.44
|
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.45
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.63
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
2.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.35
|
2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Month 3 (n=102, 102, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.38
|
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.39
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99,48, 48, NA)
|
3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.40
|
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.41
|
3.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
3.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.42
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
2.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.59
|
3.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.60
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=106 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Month 9 (n=99, 97, 96, 47, 46, NA)
|
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
4.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.55
|
3.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
2.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.78
|
4.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.80
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Month 12 (n=96, 96, 94, 44, 44, NA)
|
4.6 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.57
|
3.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.58
|
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.82
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Month 6 (n=100, 100, 99,48, 48, NA)
|
4.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
4.7 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
3.4 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.54
|
3.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.75
|
4.0 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.76
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Month 1 (n=105, 103, 104, NA, NA, 103)
|
2.9 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.47
|
2.3 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.48
|
2.1 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.5 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score
Month 3 (n=102, 102, 101, NA, NA, 102)
|
3.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.52
|
3.2 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.53
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA Units on a scale
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
1.8 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12Population: All participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug with presence of spondylitis at screening and baseline BASDAI score\>0 cm and were evaluable. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a visual analog scale of 0-100mm (0=none and 100=very severe) participants answer 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averages the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=24 Participants
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=21 Participants
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=10 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo
n=10 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=12 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
Placebo
n=22 Participants
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Month 3 (n=24, 21, 10, NA, NA, 22)
|
-1.83 cm
Standard Error 0.579
|
-2.78 cm
Standard Error 0.559
|
-2.93 cm
Standard Error 0.753
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-1.60 cm
Standard Error 0.624
|
|
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Month 6 (n=23, 21, 10, 9, 11, NA)
|
-2.24 cm
Standard Error 0.580
|
-2.35 cm
Standard Error 0.560
|
-3.58 cm
Standard Error 0.758
|
-2.85 cm
Standard Error 0.778
|
-3.31 cm
Standard Error 0.744
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Month 9 (n=23, 20, 10, 9, 9, NA)
|
-2.06 cm
Standard Error 0.575
|
-2.71 cm
Standard Error 0.558
|
2.66 cm
Standard Error 0.747
|
-3.00 cm
Standard Error 0.770
|
-3.35 cm
Standard Error 0.761
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Month 12 (n=23, 19, 10, 9, 9, NA)
|
-2.50 cm
Standard Error 0.594
|
-3.30 cm
Standard Error 0.587
|
-2.42 cm
Standard Error 0.779
|
-2.31 cm
Standard Error 0.808
|
-2.67 cm
Standard Error 0.806
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Scores Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Anklyosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Month 1 (n=24, 21, 10, NA, NA, 22)
|
-1.23 cm
Standard Error 0.537
|
-1.60 cm
Standard Error 0.508
|
-2.30 cm
Standard Error 0.673
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
NA cm
Standard Error NA
Results were not reported for this group.
|
-1.27 cm
Standard Error 0.581
|
Adverse Events
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 participants at risk
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 participants at risk
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal hernia
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Chronic gastritis
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Bile duct stone
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyoderma streptococcal
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc disorder
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Psoriatic arthropathy
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Infected neoplasm
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Postmenopausal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Rectocele
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine polyp
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial hyperreactivity
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchospasm
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.94%
1/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermal cyst
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.00%
0/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
0.00%
0/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=107 participants at risk
Participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo administered every 2 weeks.
|
Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=104 participants at risk
Participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Adalimumab, 40 mg, Every 2 Weeks
n=106 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and adalimumab, 40 mg, administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 5 mg, Twice Daily
n=52 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 1 tofacitinib 5-mg tablet twice daily, 1 placebo tablet twice daily, and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks.
|
Placebo/Tofacitinib, 10 mg, Twice Daily
n=53 participants at risk
Participants received 2 placebo tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks for 3 months. At the end of this period, participants received 2 tofacitinib 5-mg tablets twice daily and subcutaneous placebo every 2 weeks
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.93%
1/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
1.9%
2/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
5.7%
3/53
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.8%
3/107
|
3.8%
4/104
|
5.7%
6/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
7.5%
8/107
|
11.5%
12/104
|
10.4%
11/106
|
7.7%
4/52
|
7.5%
4/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
4.7%
5/107
|
5.8%
6/104
|
6.6%
7/106
|
0.00%
0/52
|
5.7%
3/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.3%
10/107
|
10.6%
11/104
|
7.5%
8/106
|
9.6%
5/52
|
9.4%
5/53
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.9%
2/107
|
3.8%
4/104
|
3.8%
4/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
7.5%
4/53
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
2.8%
3/107
|
2.9%
3/104
|
7.5%
8/106
|
5.8%
3/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
6.6%
7/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
1.9%
1/53
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
4.7%
5/107
|
4.8%
5/104
|
2.8%
3/106
|
1.9%
1/52
|
9.4%
5/53
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal pain
|
1.9%
2/107
|
0.96%
1/104
|
2.8%
3/106
|
5.8%
3/52
|
0.00%
0/53
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.7%
5/107
|
10.6%
11/104
|
6.6%
7/106
|
3.8%
2/52
|
7.5%
4/53
|
Additional Information
Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center
Pfizer, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER