Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase III to Evaluate Patient´s Preference of Subcutaneous Trastuzumab vs Intravenous in HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer (NCT NCT01875367)

NCT ID: NCT01875367

Last Updated: 2023-04-05

Results Overview

The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of the intravenous vs subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab was analyzed with the answer to the questionnaire C2, question number 39 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of experiences and preferences of the patient.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

166 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 12 weeks

Results posted on

2023-04-05

Participant Flow

Eligible patients, from the randomization and before starting subcutaneous trastuzumab (SC-t), received an additional intravenous (IV-t) cycle. After receiving this cycle, patients started the treatment with the study medication, SC-t at a fixed dose of 600 mg every 3 weeks (+3 days) for 4 cycles (2 administered from the injection of a vial in a syringe and 2 with the single-use injection device \[SID\]), being randomized 1:1 in two arms of treatment without washout period.

This is not a cross-over study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Overall Study
STARTED
81
85
Overall Study
COMPLETED
76
83
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
5
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Overall Study
Not complete at least 2 questionaries
4
2
Overall Study
Not receive study treatment
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Phase III to Evaluate Patient´s Preference of Subcutaneous Trastuzumab vs Intravenous in HER2+ Advanced Breast Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=81 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=85 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Total
n=166 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
63 years
n=5 Participants
58 years
n=7 Participants
60 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
166 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
83 Participants
n=7 Participants
161 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Arabian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal status
Premenopausal
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal status
Postmenopausal
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
73 Participants
n=7 Participants
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 0
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
61 Participants
n=7 Participants
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 1
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
ECOG 2
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Estrogen Receptor
Positive
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
60 Participants
n=7 Participants
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
Estrogen Receptor
Negative
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Progesterone Receptor
Negative
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
Progesterone Receptor
Positive
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
47 Participants
n=7 Participants
78 Participants
n=5 Participants
Time with IV trastuzumab for metastasis at registration
1.9 years
n=5 Participants
1.78 years
n=7 Participants
1.8 years
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
Homonotherapy (HT)
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
Chemotherapy (CT)
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
Other anti-cancer therapy
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
Other anti-cancer therapy+CT
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
Other anti-cancer therapy+HT
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Treatment/s combined with IV-trastuzumab at registration
None
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Other anti Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy at registration
Pertuzumab
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Other anti Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy at registration
Lapatinib
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Other anti Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) therapy at registration
None
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
69 Participants
n=7 Participants
139 Participants
n=5 Participants
Administration route at registration
Intravenous
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
Administration route at registration
Intramuscular
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
Administration route at registration
Subcutaneous
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Administration route at registration
Oral
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
Administration route at registration
None
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Metastases 1 at diagnosis
No
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
Metastases 1 at diagnosis
Yes
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
Visceral metastases at registration
Yes
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
Visceral metastases at registration
No
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
Bone metastases at registration
Yes
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Bone metastases at registration
No
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
Skin/soft tissue/lymph nodes metastases at registration
Yes
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Skin/soft tissue/lymph nodes metastases at registration
No
50 Participants
n=5 Participants
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
Median of prior treatment lines at registration
1 Treatment lines
n=5 Participants
1 Treatment lines
n=7 Participants
1 Treatment lines
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
1 Line
48 participants
n=5 Participants
55 participants
n=7 Participants
103 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
2 Lines
19 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
29 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
3 Lines
6 participants
n=5 Participants
9 participants
n=7 Participants
15 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
4 Lines
4 participants
n=5 Participants
6 participants
n=7 Participants
10 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
5 Lines
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
6 Lines
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
7 Lines
1 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Prior treatment lines at registration
None Line
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Population: Patients were randomized 1:1 in 2 arms: Arm A: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID) Arm B: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial)

The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of the intravenous vs subcutaneous administration of trastuzumab was analyzed with the answer to the questionnaire C2, question number 39 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of experiences and preferences of the patient.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=76 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=83 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Treatment Preference
Subcutaneous
66 Participants
71 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Treatment Preference
Intravenous
6 Participants
5 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous vs. Intravenous Treatment Preference
No preference
4 Participants
7 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Population: Patients were randomized 1:1 in 2 arms: Arm A: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID) Arm B: (1 cycle IV-t followed by 2 cycles SC-t with SID followed by 2 cycles SC-t with vial) It has been analysed in patients from Intention To Treat (ITT) population which have completed questionnaire nº 3 (Arm A 72 patients and Arm B 80 patients).

The percentage of patients who indicate a preference for the use of SC administration by vial or device was analyzed. This was discussed in the answer to questionaire C3, question number 28 (All things considered, what method of administration do you prefer? Subcutaneous; Intravenous; No preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the patient.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=72 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=80 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference
Device
46 Participants
44 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference
Vial
20 Participants
20 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference
No preference
4 Participants
13 Participants
Percentage of Participants With Subcutaneous Treatment (Vial vs Device Administration) Preference
Not answered
2 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Population: Questionnaires were given to the health care professionals of both arms. Information has been analyzed per administration type, not per arm. 39 health care professional satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment.

The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33a (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous: Intravenous; Subcutaneous; No differences) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=39 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference
Subcutaneous
34 Participants
Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference
Intravenous
0 Participants
Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference
No differences
4 Participants
Percentage of Medical Staff With Intravenous vs. Subcutaneous Preference
Not answered
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 12 weeks

Population: Questionnaires were given to the health care professionals of both arms. Information has been analyzed per administration type, not per arm. 39 health care professional satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment.

The medical staff satisfaction was analyzed with the answers to question number 33b (Considering all aspects, with what method of administration were you more satisfied? Between Vial vs. Device: Preferred device; Preferred vial; No Preference) of the questionnaire of experiences and preferences of the medical staff. Health care professionals were not considered enrolled, but did contribute to this assessment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=39 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
Percentage of Medical Staff Subcutaneous Device vs. Vial Preference
Preferred device
20 Participants
Percentage of Medical Staff Subcutaneous Device vs. Vial Preference
Preferred vial
11 Participants
Percentage of Medical Staff Subcutaneous Device vs. Vial Preference
No Preference
8 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: An average of 4 months

Population: This analysis was considered from 87 patients of the 166 patients included into the study, on who information of observed tasks were collected. 217 observations were made from these patients: 74 about IV-t administration process, 75 about SC-SID administration process, 68 about SC-Vial administration process.

Time spent by patient in the healthcare unit: Time between entrance and exit from the healthcare unit. Time spent by patient sitting in the infusion/treatment chair/bed: Time between sitting and rising from the patient treatment chair/bed The data was collected by qualified observers from site staff that measured the time spent by healthcare professional using a chronometer, and write it down in the paper questionnaires or directly or after in the electronic case report form.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=74 Observations
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=75 Observations
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
n=68 Observations
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
Patient Time in Healthcare Unit and Sitting in Chair/Bed
Healthcare unit
203 minutes
Standard Deviation 123.57
144.84 minutes
Standard Deviation 121.99
122.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 112.33
Patient Time in Healthcare Unit and Sitting in Chair/Bed
Sitting in the infusion/treatment chair/bed
100.01 minutes
Standard Deviation 56.34
31.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 28.74
24.75 minutes
Standard Deviation 15.42

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks

Population: Safety Population included all patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of treatment, and they were analyzed according to the actual treatment received (81 patients in arm A and 85 patients in arm B).

Safety was assessed by standard clinical and laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemistry). AE grade were defined by the NCI CTCAE (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) version 4.03.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=81 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=85 Participants
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Boths Arms: Subcutaneous-Trastuzumab Device (SC-t SID)
Patients from both arms (A and B) who received Single injection device
The Number of Participants Who Experienced Adverse Events (AE)
76 Participants
84 Participants

Adverse Events

Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 76 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial

Serious events: 10 serious events
Other events: 84 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=81 participants at risk
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=85 participants at risk
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
General disorders
Fever
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Cardiac disorders
Heart failure
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Nodule in left breast
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Infections and infestations
Cold
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Nodule in right breast
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lack of strength in left leg
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Infections and infestations
Catheter related infection (Bacteriemia)
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Surgery for surgical castration
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ostenecrosis produced by biphosphonates
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Arm A: T-IV + T-SC Vial + T-SC Device
n=81 participants at risk
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles.
Arm B: T-IV + T-SC Device + T-SC Vial
n=85 participants at risk
Trastuzumab intravenous (T-IV) x 1 cycle (usual dose of Trastuzumab), followed by 600mg of Trastuzumab Subcutaneous (T-SC) with single injection device (SID) x 2 cycles, followed by 600mg of T-SC with vial (Injectable Solution) x 2 cycles.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
9.4%
8/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Creatinine increased
16.0%
13/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
20.0%
17/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
19.8%
16/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
11.8%
10/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
18.5%
15/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
20.0%
17/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
General disorders
Fatigue
12.3%
10/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
18.8%
16/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Cardiac disorders
Heart failure
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Nodule in left breast
0.00%
0/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
1.2%
1/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Alkaline phosphatase increased
14.8%
12/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
17.6%
15/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
7.4%
6/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
5.9%
5/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Hemoglobin increased
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
2.5%
2/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
4.9%
4/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
7.1%
6/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Voice alteration
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.2%
1/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
0.00%
0/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Investigations
White blood cells decreased
18.5%
15/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
20.0%
17/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
33.3%
27/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
37.6%
32/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
General disorders
Injection site reaction
11.1%
9/81 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.
7.1%
6/85 • Through study treatment, an average of 12 weeks
AE were reported after Informed Consent Document (ICD) and before study drugs until approximately 30 days following the discontinuation of study treatment. AEs were recorded for each Arm group Arm A and Arm B, so information can not be provided separately per intervention.

Additional Information

Scientific Director / Medical Lead / Project Manager

Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group

Phone: +34916592870

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60