A Pilot RCT of Veraflo With Prontosan vs VAC in Wounds Requiring Operative Debridement

NCT ID: NCT01867580

Last Updated: 2024-12-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

181 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the Veraflo with Prontosan vs VAC in wounds that require operative debridement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wounds and Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation

Treatment Arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation

Intervention Type DEVICE

NPWT with instillation of a wound cleanser (Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution)

V.A.C.Ulta without instillation

Control Arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

V.A.C.Ulta without instillation

Intervention Type DEVICE

NPWT only

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

V.A.C.Ulta with Prontosan instillation

NPWT with instillation of a wound cleanser (Prontosan® Wound Irrigation Solution)

Intervention Type DEVICE

V.A.C.Ulta without instillation

NPWT only

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

The Subject:

* has a wound prior to informed consent
* will be admitted as an inpatient
* is \>= 18 years of age at time of consent
* is able to provide his/her own informed consent
* is willing and able to return for all scheduled and required study visits
* has an open wound \>= 4cm in any plane of measurement excluding tunnels after initial surgical debridement
* has a wound that is appropriate for NPWT according to approved indications for use
* has not participated in a clinical trial within the past 30 days
* has a 30 day wound history available if the wound has been previously treated

Exclusion Criteria

The Subject:

* is pregnant as determined by a positive serum or urine pregnancy test at the time of screening
* has a life expectancy of \< 12 months
* is not healthy enough to undergo surgery for any reason
* has, in the investigator's opinion, any clinically significant condition that would impair the participant's ability to comply with the study procedures
* has, in the opinion of the investigator, a condition that will not allow the subject to tolerate the therapy (e.g. painful conditions such as vasculitis)
* has rheumatoid arthritis
* has a bleeding disorder or coagulopathy
* has a wound that contains antibiotic cement or beads
* has an ischemic lower extremity wound as determined by lack of detectable pulses in the extremity or ankle-brachial pressure indices of \< 0.9 with a history of diabetes, or \< 0.6 if the subject is non-diabetic
* has a known allergy or hypersensitivity to V.A.C. Therapy dressing components including polyurethane or polyvinyl alcohol (drape and foam), or materials that contain acrylic adhesive (drape adhesive)
* has a known allergy or hyper sensitivity to 3M Cavilon No Sting Barrier Film or any of its components including Hexamethyldisiloxane, isooctane, acrylate terpolymer, polyphenylmethysiloxane, copolymer
* has a know allergy or hypersensitivity to Prontosan or any of its components including polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), or undecylenamidopropyl betaine
* has received NPWT on the study wound within the last 30 days
* has a wound that is contraindicated with Prontosan

a. presence of hyaline cartilage in the wound
* has a wound that is contraindicated with V.A.C. Therapy including:

1. malignancy in the wound
2. untreated osteomyelitis
3. non-enteric or unexplored fistulas
4. necrotic tissue with eschar remaining in the wound after debridement (NOTE: Once necrotic tissue or eschar is removed from the wound bed, subjects may be included)
5. unprotected, exposed blood vessels, anastomotic sites, organs, or nerves in direct contact with foam
* use of intervening layers between the wound bed and foam
* has a wound that is contraindicated with V.A.C. VeraFlo Therapy including:

1. Thoracic or abdominal cavities
2. Unexplored wounds that may communicate with adjacent body cavities
* has a wound that is closed after the initial debridement
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KCI USA, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medstar Georgetown University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St. Luke's University Hospital

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania Health System

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AHS.2011.ULTA.04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id