Open Abdomen: Vacuum Pack Versus Sylo Bag and Mesh Protocol
NCT ID: NCT01864590
Last Updated: 2016-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open Abdomen - Vacuum Pack
Patients that Require open abdomen
Vacuum Pack
Vacuum Pack Technique described by Barker et al.
Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol
Open Abdomen
Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol
double sylo bag, one underneath the fascia and the other sutured to the skin, at the initial operation.
At subsequent surgeries once the abdomen is clean the investigators leave the same subfascial sylo bag and use a prolene mesh attached to the fascia. This mesh is resutured every day until the abdominal fascia is approximated enough to permit closure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vacuum Pack
Vacuum Pack Technique described by Barker et al.
Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol
double sylo bag, one underneath the fascia and the other sutured to the skin, at the initial operation.
At subsequent surgeries once the abdomen is clean the investigators leave the same subfascial sylo bag and use a prolene mesh attached to the fascia. This mesh is resutured every day until the abdominal fascia is approximated enough to permit closure
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
13 Years
96 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad de Antioquia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carlos Hernando Morales
Chief Surgery Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos H Morales, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universidad de Antioquia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundacion
Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Correa JC, Mejia DA, Duque N, J MM, Uribe CM. Managing the open abdomen: negative pressure closure versus mesh-mediated fascial traction closure: a randomized trial. Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1459-9. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
University Of Antioquia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id