Open Abdomen: Vacuum Pack Versus Sylo Bag and Mesh Protocol

NCT ID: NCT01864590

Last Updated: 2016-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The open abdomen is a valid and accepted surgical tactic for the trauma and acute care patient. There have been many mechanisms described for its management, but the most accepted strategy is the vacuum pack. At our hospital the investigators have used for many years a double sylo bag, one underneath the fascia and the other sutured to the skin, at the initial operation. At subsequent surgeries once the abdomen is clean the investigators leave the same subfascial sylo bag and use a prolene mesh attached to the fascia. Every day the investigators try to tighten the mesh with sutures until the abdomen can be closed. This study´s objective is to compare our double sylo bag- mesh protocol with the vacuum pack to determine which is related to a higher fascial closure rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Investigators plan to compare our double sylo-mesh protocol with the vacuum pack technique described by Barker et al. To accomplish this they have designed a randomized trial that will include patients that require an open abdomen strategy according to their attending physician either due to a traumatic or a medical cause. Once the surgeon decides to leave the abdomen open, one of the nurses will pick up an envelope from the randomization box and read out loud the patients allocation (Vacuum pack or Double sylo bag-mesh protocol) . During subsequent surgeries the patient must continue with the same strategy for a minimum of 21 days or until fascial closure. The patients will be followed during their whole hospital stay to determine complication rates and fascial closures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Open Abdomen Temporary Abdominal Closure Mechanisms

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Temporary Abdominal Closure Mesh Abdominal reconstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Open Abdomen - Vacuum Pack

Patients that Require open abdomen

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Vacuum Pack

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vacuum Pack Technique described by Barker et al.

Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol

Open Abdomen

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol

Intervention Type DEVICE

double sylo bag, one underneath the fascia and the other sutured to the skin, at the initial operation.

At subsequent surgeries once the abdomen is clean the investigators leave the same subfascial sylo bag and use a prolene mesh attached to the fascia. This mesh is resutured every day until the abdominal fascia is approximated enough to permit closure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vacuum Pack

Vacuum Pack Technique described by Barker et al.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Double Sylo Bag - Mesh Protocol

double sylo bag, one underneath the fascia and the other sutured to the skin, at the initial operation.

At subsequent surgeries once the abdomen is clean the investigators leave the same subfascial sylo bag and use a prolene mesh attached to the fascia. This mesh is resutured every day until the abdominal fascia is approximated enough to permit closure

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Open Abdomen

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients that die in the first 48 hours after the initial intervention
Minimum Eligible Age

13 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

96 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad de Antioquia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carlos Hernando Morales

Chief Surgery Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos H Morales, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad de Antioquia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundacion

Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Colombia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Correa JC, Mejia DA, Duque N, J MM, Uribe CM. Managing the open abdomen: negative pressure closure versus mesh-mediated fascial traction closure: a randomized trial. Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):221-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1459-9. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26833235 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

University Of Antioquia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id