Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) in Pediatric Non-Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Subjects

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research study is to determine whether Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) can improve hearing in children who are deaf and cannot receive a cochlear implants.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Feasibility Study of Auditory Brainstem Implant in Young Children

NCT01850225

Bilateral Cochlear Aplasia Bilateral Cochlear Nerve Deficiency Bilateral Cochlear Ossification Secondary to Meningitis

WITHDRAWN PHASE1

An Implant for Hearing Loss Due to Removal of Neurofibromatosis 2 Tumors

NCT00030043

Neurofibromatosis 2

COMPLETED PHASE1

MRI Laryngeal Imaging With a Surface Coil

NCT00965003

Laryngeal Neoplasms Head and Neck Cancers Larynx Cancer

TERMINATED EARLY_PHASE1

Effect of Implant Position on Magnetic Resonance Image Distortion

NCT02246231

Neurofibromatosis Type 2

COMPLETED NA

Radiofrequency Ablation of Tumors

NCT00705497

Primary Tumors Metastatic Tumors

COMPLETED PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The goal of this MEEI Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) research study is to find new ways to improve hearing in children who are deaf and cannot receive a cochlear implant. The ABI is a surgically placed bionic implant that converts sounds into electrical signals that are directly transmitted to the cochlear nucleus, the first auditory center of the brain. For many years, ABIs have improved the hearing of patients who are deaf due to brain tumors associated with a genetic syndrome called Neurofibromatosis Type 2 (NF2). However, a number of recent studies suggest that deaf patients who do not have NF2 and are not eligible for a cochlear implant may also benefit from placement of an ABI. These preliminary studies suggest that these non-NF2 or "nontumor" patients may actually have better outcomes after ABI surgery than patients suffering from NF2. Children appear to be particularly good candidates because of their developmental plasticity and in many studies, outcomes are more favorable in children that adults. Patients who do not have NF2 and are deaf due to abnormalities in their hearing nerves or inner ears from congenital malformations, infection, disease, or injury are not cochlear implant candidates and there are no other options to improve hearing in these cases except for the ABI. Thus, the purpose of our study is to carefully analyze whether ABI surgery improves the hearing and quality of life of non-NF2 children based on subjective and objective measures of their hearing before and after ABI surgery. In particular, we plan to study ABI outcomes in non-NF2 pediatric patients, characterize the parameters used on their devices, and determine the safety profile of ABIs in these patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bilateral Hearing Loss for Causes Other Than Tumors

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Non-NF2 ABI surgery

All subjects will be part of a single arm involving placement of the ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) device. The Nucleus 24 was discontinued and is no longer available.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nucleus 24 (discontinued) and ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implants (ABI)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Nucleus ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for five years following surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nucleus 24 (discontinued) and ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implants (ABI)

Nucleus ABI541 Auditory Brainstem Implant (ABI) surgery followed by device activation, testing, and clinical assessment for five years following surgery.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ABI, Nucleus 24, ABI541, Nucleus Profile, Cochlear Americas

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Pre-linguistic hearing loss (birth-5 yrs.; age at ABI implantation 18 months-5yrs) with both:

1. MRI +/- CT evidence of one of the following:

* Cochlear nerve deficiency
* Cochlear aplasia or severe hypoplasia
* Severe inner ear malformation
* Post-meningitis ossification
2. When a cochlea is present or patent with a normally appearing cochlear nerve, lack of significant benefit from CI despite consistent use (\>6 mo.)

* No or limited speech perception ability (limited to pattern perception on closed set testing materials using the CI)
* Lack of progress in auditory skills development
2. Post-linguistic hearing loss (\<18 yrs. of age) with both:

1. Loss or lack of benefit from appropriate CI without the possibility for revision or contralateral implantation. Examples might include:

* Post-meningitis ossification
* Bilateral temporal bone fractures with cochlear nerve avulsion
* Failed revision CI without benefit
2. Previously developed open set speech perception and auditory-oral language skills
3. No medical contraindications
4. Willing to receive the appropriate meningitis vaccinations
5. No or limited cognitive/developmental delays which would be expected to interfere with the child's ability to cooperate in testing and/or programming of the device, in developing speech and oral language, or which would make an implant and subsequent emphasis on aural/oral communication not in the child's best interest
6. Strong family support including language proficiency of the parent(s) in the child's primary mode of communication as well as written and spoken English.
7. Reasonable expectations from parents including a thorough understanding:

* of potential benefits and limitations of ABI
* of parental role in rehabilitation
* that the child may not develop spoken language as a primary communication mode or even sufficient spoken language to make significant academic progress in an aural/oral environment
8. Involvement in an educational program that emphasizes development of auditory skills with or without the use of supplementary visual communication.
9. Able to comply with study requirements including travel to investigation sites and clinic visits.
10. Informed consent for the procedure from the child's parents.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pre- or post-linguistic child currently making significant progress with CI - This will be considered if a child is progressing along the expected speech reception hierarchy (SRI-Q) as detailed by Wang et al (50). Even for the very young children (18 months of age with 6 months of use), nearly all children with a good auditory signal from their CI will have reached ceiling effects on the IT-MAIS and have pattern perception beyond chance using the ESP (50). Moreover, there will evidence of improvement in these metrics over time.
2. MRI evidence of one of the following:

* normal cochlea and cochlear nerves or NF2
* brainstem or cortical anomaly that makes implantation unfeasible
3. Clear surgical reason for poor CI performance that can be remediated with revision CI or contralateral surgery rather than ABI.
4. Intractable seizures or progressive, deteriorating neurological disorder
5. Unable to participate in behavioral testing and mapping with their CI. If this appears to be an age effect, ABI will be delayed until we can be assured that the child will be able to participate, as reliable objective measures of mapping are currently not available for mapping these devices.
6. Lack of potential for spoken language development. This will be considered the case when evidence of the following exist:

* Severe psychomotor retardation, autism, cerebral palsy, or developmental delays beyond speech that would preclude usage of the device and oral educational development. Autism is a special case where there is the potential for delayed presentation. When early signs are considered present, we will request a comprehensive developmental assessment for further evaluation prior to considering routine evaluation.
7. Unable to tolerate general anesthesia (cardiac, pulmonary, bleeding diathesis, etc.).
8. Need for brainstem irradiation
9. Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject/family regarding the possible benefits, risks and limitations that are inherent to the procedure and prosthetic device.
10. Unwilling to sign the informed consent.
11. Unwilling to make necessary follow-up appointments.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No