Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study: CroFab® vs Placebo for Copperhead Snake Envenomation
NCT ID: NCT01864200
Last Updated: 2017-11-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CroFab
crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine) per approved labeling
Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine)
crotalidae antivenom
Saline placebo
Saline placebo
Placebo
Saline placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Crotalidae polyvalent immune fab (ovine)
crotalidae antivenom
Placebo
Saline placebo
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
a. Snake identified by one of the following means: i.Snake or photograph of snake brought to Emergency Department ii.Patient chooses copperhead from an array of snake photographs iii.Patient envenomated in an area where only copperheads are endemic iv.Patient envenomated by a captive copperhead snake
* Completion of informed consent and eligibility confirmation within 24 hours of envenomation
* Envenomation on only one extremity, distal to the elbow or knee
* Clinical evidence of mild or moderate venom effect (limb swelling and/or tenderness) is present (Venom effects need not be progressing.)
* Patient willing and able to complete follow-up schedule of assessments
* Patient is able to read, comprehend and sign the IRB approved consent document(s)
* Patient is able to read and comprehend the written assessment tools (e.g., DASH, LEFS, PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 10a (PROMIS PF-10), PGIC, etc.)
* Patient is ≥12 years of age
* Patient is sober, competent, and able to complete verbal and written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
i. Swelling to an entire extremity (all major joints affected)
1. Lower extremity: swelling crossing hip joint
2. Upper extremity: swelling crossing shoulder joint ii. INR \> 2.0 iii. Platelets \<50,000 cells / µL iv. Fibrinogen \<50 mg/dL
v. Compartment syndrome vi. Systolic Blood Pressure \<90 mmHg vii. More than minimal bleeding viii. Investigator's clinical discretion
* Patient has already received antivenom for the management of the current envenomation
* Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
* Patient is a prisoner
* Patient has a distracting injury or condition with acute pain or functional impairment, and/or is unable to make a reliable self-report of functionality status based solely on the condition of interest
* Patient had a previous snake envenomation to any body area in the 30 days prior to screening/enrollment, regardless of whether antivenom was administered for the previous envenomation
* Patient had an acute traumatic event, surgery, an acute medical event, or exacerbation of a pre-existing medical or surgical condition affecting the envenomated extremity within the 30 days prior to screening/enrollment
* Patient has participated in a clinical study involving an investigational pharmaceutical product or device within the 3 months prior to screening that may have impact on clinical outcomes of snakebite
* Patient has previously participated in this clinical study
* Patient has a known history of hypersensitivity to any components of CroFab®, or to papaya or papain
* Patient is otherwise unsuitable for inclusion in this study, based on the opinion of the Investigator
12 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
BTG International Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria Gasior, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
BTG International Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Georgia Regents University
Augusta, Georgia, United States
University of Kansas Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Vidant Medical Center
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Lehigh Valley Hospital Center
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Palmetto Health Richland
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
St Joseph Regional Health Center
Bryan, Texas, United States
University of Texas - Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
Ben Taub General Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
Scott & White Hospital
Temple, Texas, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Marshall Health
Huntington, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BTG-PR005-002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id