Study Of Diabetic Nephropathy With Atrasentan

NCT ID: NCT01858532

Last Updated: 2019-04-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

5107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-17

Study Completion Date

2018-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study objective was to evaluate the effect of atrasentan compared with placebo on time to doubling of serum creatinine (DBSC) or the onset of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in participants with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy who were treated with the maximum tolerated labeled daily dose (MTLDD) of a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor. In addition, the study assessed the effects of atrasentan compared with placebo on cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, urine albumin excretion, changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as the impact on quality of life in participants with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a Phase 3, prospective, randomized, double-blind, enriched-population, placebo controlled, multicenter study in adult participants with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. Participants who met the inclusion criteria for initial study entry and none of the exclusion criteria were eligible to proceed to the Run-In Period to optimize RAS inhibitor and diuretic doses. Following the Run-In Period, eligible participants entered the 6-week Enrichment Period in which all received atrasentan to determine their urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) response and to assess tolerability of atrasentan. Responders and nonresponders were then randomly assigned to receive atrasentan or placebo in the Double-Blind Treatment Period. The study was performed in 5 to 6 periods in the following sequence: Pre-Screening Period (optional); Screening Period (Visits S1 and S2); Run-In Period (up to 12 weeks; Visits R1 to R6); Enrichment Period (6 weeks; Visits E1 to E5); Double-Blind Treatment Period (randomization to final treatment visit); and Follow-Up Period (Final Treatment to F1 visit \[45 days post treatment\] and other post-treatment visits). The study was prematurely discontinued because of a lower than expected event rate for the renal composite endpoint, which was adjudicated by a blinded independent events adjudication committee (EAC).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Nephropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Atrasentan

0.75 mg atrasentan once daily by mouth for up to 52 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Atrasentan

Intervention Type DRUG

Film-coated tablet

Placebo

Placebo once daily by mouth for up to 52 months

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Film-coated tablet

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Atrasentan

Film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Film-coated tablet

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ABT-627

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participant, or legal representative, had voluntarily signed and dated an Informed Consent Form, approved by an Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), after the nature of the study had been explained and the participant had the opportunity to ask questions. The informed consent must have been signed before any study-specific procedures were performed.
* Participant had type 2 diabetes (including participants with latent autoimmune diabetes or insulin-treated participants without a history of diabetic ketoacidosis who also had a negative anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase test AND an elevated post-prandial serum C-peptide level) and had been treated with at least one anti-hyperglycemic medication and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or Angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB; RAS inhibitor) for at least 4 weeks prior to the Screening S2 visit.
* For entry into the Run-In Period the participant must have satisfied the following criteria based on the Screening laboratory values:

* Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 25 to 75 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 \[until the eGFR cap on participants (approximately 300) with a baseline of \> 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 was reached\] and a urine albumin creatinine ratio (UACR) greater than or equal to 300 and less than 5,000 mg/g (greater than or equal to 34 mg/mmol and less than 565 mg/mmol);
* Serum albumin greater than or equal to 2.5 g/dL (25 g/L);
* Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) less than or equal to 200 pg/mL (200 ng/L);
* Systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than or equal to 110 and less than or equal to 180 mmHg;
* Serum potassium greater than or equal to 3.5 mEq/L (3.5 mmol/L) and less than or equal to 6.0 mEq/L (6.0 mmol/L);
* Participants on a maximum tolerated labeled daily dose (MTLDD) of a RAS inhibitor for greater than or equal to 4 weeks and on a diuretic at the time of screening and who satisfied the above criteria may have proceeded to the last visit in the Run-In Period (R6);
* Participants already on a MTLDD of a RAS inhibitor for greater than or equal to 4 weeks and not on a diuretic (unless medically contraindicated) at the time of Screening were to start with a diuretic and participate in Run-In for at least 2 weeks.
* For entry into the Enrichment Period the participant must have satisfied the following criteria based on the last visit of the Run-In Period:

* RAS inhibitor at the MTLDD for the previous 4 weeks with no adjustments of the dose;
* Participants that were on a MTLDD RAS inhibitor and not on a diuretic (unless medically contraindicated) at the time of Screening must have been in Run-In for at least 2 weeks.
* For entry into the Double-Blind Treatment Period, participants must have satisfied the following criteria based on the last visit of the Enrichment Period:

* RAS inhibitor at the MTLDD for the previous 6 weeks during the Enrichment Period with no adjustments of the dose;
* Diuretic at any dose unless medically contraindicated or clinically intolerable in the investigator's judgement (i.e., hypotension or hypokalemia);
* Participants must not have had a weight change greater than or equal to 3 kg from the beginning of Enrichment to the end of the Enrichment Period and absolute serum BNP greater than or equal to 300 pg/mL (300 ng/L) at the last Enrichment visit;
* Participants must not have had an increase in serum creatinine greater than 0.5 mg/dL and greater than 20% increase from the beginning of Enrichment to the end of the Enrichment Period.

Exclusion Criteria

A participant was not eligible for entry into the Run-in Period if he/she met any of the following criteria:

* Participant had a history of severe peripheral edema or facial edema requiring diuretics unrelated to trauma or a history of myxedema in the prior 4 weeks to the initial Screening S1 visit.
* Participant had a history of pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary fibrosis or any lung diseases requiring oxygen therapy (e.g., chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema).
* Participant had a documented diagnosis of heart failure, previous hospitalization for heart failure or current or constellation of symptoms (dyspnea on exertion, pedal edema, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea) felt to be compatible with heart failure, that was not explained by other causes, and for which there was a change in medication or other management directed at heart failure.
* Participant had known non-diabetic kidney disease (other than kidney stones).
* Participant had elevated liver enzymes (serum alanine aminotransaminase \[ALT\] and/or serum aspartate aminotransaminase \[AST\]) \> 3 × the upper limit of normal (ULN).
* Participant had hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL (90 g/L).
* Participant had a sensitivity to loop diuretics.
* Participant had a history of an allergic reaction or significant sensitivity to atrasentan (or its excipients) or similar compounds.
* Participant had a history of chronic gastrointestinal disease, which, in the Investigator's opinion, may have caused significant GI malabsorption.
* Participant had a history of secondary hypertension (i.e., hemodynamically significant renal artery stenosis, primary aldosteronism or pheochromocytoma).
* Participant had significant comorbidities (e.g., advanced malignancy, advanced liver disease) with a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
* Participant had clinically significant cerebrovascular disease (CVD) or coronary artery disease (CAD) within 3 months prior to the Screening S1 visit, defined as one of the following:

* Hospitalization for MI or unstable angina; or
* New onset angina with positive functional study or coronary angiogram revealing stenosis; or
* Coronary revascularization procedure; or
* Transient Ischemic Attack or Stroke.
* Participant had received any investigational drug including atrasentan within 3 months prior to the Screening S1 visit.
* Participant received dialysis treatments or was expected to receive dialysis or renal transplant within 6 months of screening.
* Participant was currently receiving rosiglitazone, moxonidine, aldosterone blockers, aliskiren or a combination of ACEi and ARB.
* Participant was a premenopausal woman defined as (for study purposes) any female subject with a menses in the past 2 years. For women who were \< 50 years old, serum FSH must have been greater than 35 IU/L. Women who were surgically sterile or had a history of hysterectomy may not have necessarily be postmenopausal, and must also have had an FSH \> 35 IU/L.
* Participant was at high risk for QT/QTc prolongation such as a family history of Long QT Syndrome, defined as QTc prolongation exceeding 450 ms in men, or 460 ms in women.
* Participant had type 1 diabetes.
* Participant was considered to be clinically unstable regarding general, metabolic or cardiovascular health as determined by the Investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AbbVie

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AbbVie Inc.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AbbVie

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jongs N, Gasparyan SB, Frison L, Schloemer P, Brinker M, Little DJ, Heerspink HJL. Use of eGFR Slope Thresholds as End Point Components in a Kidney Disease Progression Hierarchical Composite End Point. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000766. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40526444 (View on PubMed)

Smeijer JD, de Vries ST, Kohan DE, Hou FF, Heerspink HJL. Sex differences in response to the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan in individuals with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: a post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial. Diabetologia. 2025 Mar;68(3):516-525. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06326-x. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39661119 (View on PubMed)

Heerspink HJL, Jongs N, Schloemer P, Little DJ, Brinker M, Tasto C, Karpefors M, Wheeler DC, Bakris G, Perkovic V, Nkulikiyinka R, Rossert J, Gasparyan SB. Development and Validation of a New Hierarchical Composite End Point for Clinical Trials of Kidney Disease Progression. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Dec 1;34(12):2025-2038. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000243. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37872654 (View on PubMed)

Smeijer JD, Kohan DE, Rossing P, Correa-Rotter R, Liew A, Tang SCW, de Zeeuw D, Gansevoort RT, Ju W, Lambers Heerspink HJ. Insulin resistance, kidney outcomes and effects of the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Sep 16;22(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-01964-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37716952 (View on PubMed)

Chan KW, Smeijer JD, Schechter M, Jongs N, Vart P, Kohan DE, Gansevoort RT, Liew A, Tang SCW, Wanner C, de Zeeuw D, Heerspink HJL. Post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial indicates that the endothelin receptor antagonist atrasentan is associated with less pain in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2023 Dec;104(6):1219-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.08.014. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37657768 (View on PubMed)

Smeijer JD, Koomen J, Kohan DE, McMurray JJV, Bakris GL, Correa-Rotter R, Hou FF, Januzzi JL, Kitzman DW, Kolansky DM, Makino H, Perkovic V, Tobe S, Parving HH, de Zeeuw D, Heerspink HJL. Increase in BNP in Response to Endothelin-Receptor Antagonist Atrasentan Is Associated With Incident Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2022 Jul;10(7):498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.03.004. Epub 2022 May 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35772861 (View on PubMed)

Waijer SW, Gansevoort RT, Bakris GL, Correa-Rotter R, Hou FF, Kohan DE, Kitzman DW, Makino H, McMurray JJV, Perkovic V, Tobe S, Parving HH, de Zeeuw D, Heerspink HJL. The Effect of Atrasentan on Kidney and Heart Failure Outcomes by Baseline Albuminuria and Kidney Function: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SONAR Randomized Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Dec;16(12):1824-1832. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07340521. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34853062 (View on PubMed)

Koomen JV, Stevens J, Bakris G, Correa-Rotter R, Hou FF, Kitzman DW, Kohan DE, Makino H, McMurray JJV, Parving HH, Perkovic V, Tobe SW, de Zeeuw D, Heerspink HJL. Individual Atrasentan Exposure is Associated With Long-term Kidney and Heart Failure Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jun;109(6):1631-1638. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2143. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33338269 (View on PubMed)

Heerspink HJL, Parving HH, Andress DL, Bakris G, Correa-Rotter R, Hou FF, Kitzman DW, Kohan D, Makino H, McMurray JJV, Melnick JZ, Miller MG, Pergola PE, Perkovic V, Tobe S, Yi T, Wigderson M, de Zeeuw D; SONAR Committees and Investigators. Atrasentan and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (SONAR): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1937-1947. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30772-X. Epub 2019 Apr 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30995972 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-005848-21

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

M11-352

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Renal Impairment Study With ASP1941
NCT01302028 COMPLETED PHASE1
OPTIMISE-CKD Drug Utilization
NCT05932901 COMPLETED
Renal Mechanism of Action/Splay vs. TmG
NCT00726505 TERMINATED PHASE1