Hip Replacement in a High Volume Community Hospital: Effect on Length of Stay and Hospital Cost

NCT ID: NCT01857505

Last Updated: 2014-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators propose to evaluate and compare the percentage of patients who are able to be discharged in less than 3 days after undergoing total hip arthroscopy through either a direct anterior or posterior approach, utilizing the identical post operative protocol. The investigators also propose to evaluate the costs associated with the two different approaches to hip replacement in the same group of patients. Post operative resource utilization, discharge disposition, and pain medicine requirement will also be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators hypothesize that a higher proportion of patients treated with the direct anterior approach for hip replacement will be able to leave the hospital in less than 3 days when compared with a less invasive posterior approach. Secondly, decreased length of stay associated with the procedure may reduce hospital costs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Total Hip replacement Fracture table DePuySynthes Direct anterior approach hip replacement Posterior approach hip replacement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Direct Anterior Approach hip replacement

Single surgeon series of 105 consecutive patients who underwent hip replacement via the direct anterior approach on a fracture table

No interventions assigned to this group

Posterior Approach Hip Replacement

105 consecutive patients previously operated on by a less invasive posterior approach at the same institution. These surgeries occurred prior to March, 2010.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Consecutive single surgeon series of patients who have undergone primary uncemented hip replacement at our institution through either a posterior approach or direct anterior approach on a fracture table. Posterior approach patient - most recent patient prior to March, 2010, compared with consecutive recent anterior approach patients with minimum of 6 month follow-up.
2. Diagnosis of osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, or avascular necrosis.
3. No previous surgery on affected hip.
4. Age 40-90 at time of surgery

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient not permitted to bear full weight after the procedure, per post operative instructions
2. Hip replacement performed for acute fracture.
3. Previous hip surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

DePuy Orthopaedics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Anne Arundel Health System Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul King, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Anne Arundel Medical Center / Anne Arundel Orthopedic Surgeons

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anne Arundel Medical Center

Annapolis, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hayes JH, Cleary R, Gillespie WJ, Pinder IM, Sher JL. Are clinical and patient assessed outcomes affected by reducing length of hospital stay for total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):448-52. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.4346.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10884204 (View on PubMed)

Vorhies JS, Wang Y, Herndon J, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI. Readmission and length of stay after total hip arthroplasty in a national Medicare sample. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6 Suppl):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.036. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21723700 (View on PubMed)

Duwelius PJ, Moller HS, Burkhart RL, Waller F, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL. The economic impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6):883-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21051190 (View on PubMed)

Matta JM, Ferguson TA. The anterior approach for hip replacement. Orthopedics. 2005 Sep;28(9):927-8. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20050901-11. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16190055 (View on PubMed)

Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:115-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16330993 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IIS-000158

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id