Trial Outcomes & Findings for Physical Health in Midlife: Influences of Adversity and Relationships Over Time (NCT NCT01853332)
NCT ID: NCT01853332
Last Updated: 2017-07-24
Results Overview
To assess clinically significant physical health outcomes including 1) establishing risk factors for CVD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) 2) establishing novel risk factors for CVD and DM (e.g., inflammatory markers, hormonal mediators ), and 3) determining the prevalence of established CVD and DM. 1. Both insulin and glucose will be measured. 2. Adipokines. 3. Myokines. 4. Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol will be considered in light of their relevance to CVD. 5. Proinflammatory markers.
COMPLETED
210 participants
2.5 years
2017-07-24
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
New participants: The purpose of the study is to learn about physical health in midlife and how it has been influenced by experiences and relationships. The study specifically targets health differences and the development of heart disease and diabetes.
AND
Former participants (or the partner of a former participant) of the Adolescent and Family Development Project, Young Adult Development Project, Across Generations Project, and/or Paths Over Time Project may already know that this research shows how people grow, individually and as part of a familial and social network, throughout the course of life. This study focuses on learning about former participants' physical health in midlife and how it has been influenced by their experiences and relationships.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
210
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
151
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
59
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Physical Health in Midlife: Influences of Adversity and Relationships Over Time
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New and Former Participants
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2.5 yearsTo assess clinically significant physical health outcomes including 1) establishing risk factors for CVD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) 2) establishing novel risk factors for CVD and DM (e.g., inflammatory markers, hormonal mediators ), and 3) determining the prevalence of established CVD and DM. 1. Both insulin and glucose will be measured. 2. Adipokines. 3. Myokines. 4. Triglycerides and HDL cholesterol will be considered in light of their relevance to CVD. 5. Proinflammatory markers.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Hormonal Levels
glucose
|
910000 ng/ml
Interval 840000.0 to 960000.0
|
|
Hormonal Levels
insulin
|
5.8 ng/ml
Interval 3.2 to 10.3
|
|
Hormonal Levels
adipokines (leptin)
|
22.8 ng/ml
Interval 6.9 to 37.0
|
|
Hormonal Levels
myokines (irisin)
|
171.8 ng/ml
Interval 142.5 to 214.2
|
|
Hormonal Levels
triglycerides
|
820000 ng/ml
Interval 600000.0 to 1170000.0
|
|
Hormonal Levels
HDL-cholesterol
|
530000 ng/ml
Interval 450000.0 to 650000.0
|
|
Hormonal Levels
proinflammatory markers (CRP)
|
16000 ng/ml
Interval 6000.0 to 37000.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2.5 yearsCumulative adversity occurring before age 18 was assessed using a) the Evaluation of Lifetime Stressors, b) SCID, and c) the Adult Attachment Interview. A cumulative adversity sum score was obtained (range 0-13, higher more).An overall adversity score was created by multiplying the number of childhood adversities×the overall severity of childhood adversity × the overall chronicity of childhood adversity. Scores for overall adversity ranged from 0 (no) to 156 more adversity).The Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months and ranges from 1 (excellent) to 7 (very poor adjustment). An index score of psychosocial risk factors was created. Education less than a Bachelor's degree, unemployment, and a social adjustment scale score indicative of non-optimal functiong (≥ 3) were considered risk factors, coded as "1", and then tallied. Range of scores 0 (less)-3 (more risk).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Psychosocial Adversity
Cumulative Adversity Score
|
3.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.73
|
|
Psychosocial Adversity
Overall Childhood Adversity
|
22.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.98
|
|
Psychosocial Adversity
Social Adjustment Scale
|
2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
|
Psychosocial Adversity
Psychosocial Risk Factors
|
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2.5 yearsCorrelations of scales with BMI score. Cumulative adversity occurring before age 18 was assessed using a) the Evaluation of Lifetime Stressors, b) SCID, and c) the Adult Attachment Interview. A cumulative adversity sum score was obtained (range 0-13; higher is more adversity). An overall adversity score was created by multiplying the number of childhood adversities × the overall severity of childhood adversity × the overall chronicity of childhood adversity. Scores for overall adversity ranged from 0 to 156 (higher is more adversity). The Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months and ranges from 1 (excellent adjustment) to 7 (very poor adjustment). Psychosocial risk factors is an index of 1 to 3 (higher is more risk). Health risk score adds smoking, non-optimal drinking (\>7/14 drinks/week for women/men), a score in the bottom tertile of the AHEI, and minimal exercise (\<6 hours/week)and tallied (scores0-4 with higher worse).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Cumulative Adversity Score with BMI
|
0.17 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Psychosocial Risk Factors with BMI
|
0.23 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Social Adjustment with BMI
|
-0.17 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Cumulative Adversity Score with Health Risk Factor
|
0.14 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Psychosocial Risk Factors with Health Risk Factors
|
0.49 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
|
Psychosocial Health Risk Factors Correlated With BMI
Social Adjustment with Health Risk Factors
|
0.45 Pearson Correlation Coefficients
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2.5 yearsThe Social Adjustment Scale is a semi-structured interview assessing functioning in the preceding 2 months in domains of work (including employment functioning, homemaking and other household functions, and/or student/educational functioning), friendships/leisure, and relationships with extended family. If applicable, relationships with immediate family members (spouse/partner and/or children) are also assessed. The SAS is closely linked to mental health and can be used as a tool for assessing treatment response to psychotropic medications or therapies. Positive adjustment is the ability to carry out each activity/role effectively, deriving satisfaction/support from that domain, whereas poor adjustment reflects maladaptation, dissatisfaction, disengagement, and/or discord. Scores range from 1 (excellent adjustment) to 7 (very poor adjustment). Coding was completed during an audio-recorded interview; 12% were coded for agreement (91%).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Social Adjustment Scale
|
2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: cross-sectionalBMI is calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
30.41 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: cross-sectionalAn index score of health behavior risk factors was created. Any amount of smoking, non-optimal drinking (≥ 7 drinks per week for women; ≥ 14 drinks per week for men), a score in the bottom tertile of the AHEI, and minimal exercise (\< 6 metabolic hours per week) were considered risk factors, coded as "1", and then tallied. The range of scores for health risk factors in the current sample was between 0 and 4 health risk factors (where 4 is more risk factors).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cross-Sectional
n=151 Participants
New participants and former participants
|
|---|---|
|
Health Risk Factors
|
1.33 sum of health risk factors
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
Adverse Events
Cross-Sectional
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Christos Mantzoros
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place