Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Decitabine (DACOGEN) in Sequential Administration With Cytarabine in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (NCT NCT01853228)
NCT ID: NCT01853228
Last Updated: 2019-06-17
Results Overview
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for cytarabine was based on the number of participants experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by the end of Cycle 1. A non-hematological DLT was defined as: any Grade \>=3 toxicity that persists for greater than (\>) 5 days or any Grade 2 toxicity that persists for \>7 days and that is intolerable to the participant. A hematological DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia due to a hypoplastic bone marrow at Day 42, in the absence of malignant infiltration. The nominal duration of each cycle was 28 days. However, participants who had not experienced bone marrow recovery at Day 28 were followed up to Day 42. Failure of marrow recovery (improvement to Grade 3) by Day 42 was considered a DLT. The maximum duration of Cycle 1 was therefore 42 days.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
17 participants
Cycle 1 (42 days)
2019-06-17
Participant Flow
Total 17 participants were enrolled in the study. 16 participants were enrolled in Phase 1 (9 participants in Cohort 1 and 7 participants in Cohort 2). 7 participants of Cohort 2 continued to Phase 2. One additional participant was enrolled in Phase 2 of the study, making a total of 8 participants evaluable in Phase 2.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Decitabine 20 mg/m^2 + Cytarabine 1 g/m^2
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle). In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 1 of Phase 1.
|
Cohort 2: Decitabine 20 mg/m^2 + Cytarabine 2 g/m^2
Participants received decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 2 of Phase 1. Participants who completed Phase 1 were continued in Phase 2 and received cytarabine at MTD determined in Phase 1 (2 g/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1
STARTED
|
9
|
7
|
|
Phase 1
COMPLETED
|
0
|
7
|
|
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
STARTED
|
0
|
8
|
|
Phase 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cohort 1: Decitabine 20 mg/m^2 + Cytarabine 1 g/m^2
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle). In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 1 of Phase 1.
|
Cohort 2: Decitabine 20 mg/m^2 + Cytarabine 2 g/m^2
Participants received decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 2 of Phase 1. Participants who completed Phase 1 were continued in Phase 2 and received cytarabine at MTD determined in Phase 1 (2 g/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1
Lack of Efficacy
|
8
|
0
|
|
Phase 1
Other
|
1
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Phase 2
Proceed To Transplant
|
0
|
3
|
|
Phase 2
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Decitabine (DACOGEN) in Sequential Administration With Cytarabine in Children With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Dacogen + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) (Cohort 1) and 2 g/m\^2 (Cohort 2) dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
73.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.26 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
8 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (42 days)Population: Population included participants who experienced a DLT by the end of Cycle 1.
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for cytarabine was based on the number of participants experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) by the end of Cycle 1. A non-hematological DLT was defined as: any Grade \>=3 toxicity that persists for greater than (\>) 5 days or any Grade 2 toxicity that persists for \>7 days and that is intolerable to the participant. A hematological DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia due to a hypoplastic bone marrow at Day 42, in the absence of malignant infiltration. The nominal duration of each cycle was 28 days. However, participants who had not experienced bone marrow recovery at Day 28 were followed up to Day 42. Failure of marrow recovery (improvement to Grade 3) by Day 42 was considered a DLT. The maximum duration of Cycle 1 was therefore 42 days.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=6 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cytarabine
|
2 gram per square meter
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 minute (min), 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusionPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in this study assessed for pharmacokinetics (PK). Pharmacokinetic analysis was planned to be reported for the overall participants including Phase 1 and 2. Here 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified category.
Total clearance of drug after intravenously administration was calculated as: dose/area under the plasma concentration-time curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine
>1 month to less than or equal to (<=) 2 years
|
160.6 liter per hour per square meter
Interval 11.7 to 942.3
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine
Greater than (>) 2 to <= 6 years
|
152.1 liter per hour per square meter
Interval 19.5 to 1061.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine
> 6 to <= 12 years
|
125.9 liter per hour per square meter
Interval 13.3 to 951.3
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Total Clearance of Decitabine
> 12 to <= 16 years
|
123.2 liter per hour per square meter
Interval 11.4 to 832.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusionPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in this study assessed for PK. Pharmacokinetic analysis was planned to be reported for the overall participants including Phase 1 and 2. Here 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified category.
Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine
> 1 month to <= 2 years
|
35.9 liter per square meter
Interval 2.7 to 558.4
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine
> 2 to <= 6 years
|
36.5 liter per square meter
Interval 1.4 to 535.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine
> 6 to <= 12 years
|
31.8 liter per square meter
Interval 2.0 to 645.8
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Decitabine
> 12 to <= 16 years
|
35.9 liter per square meter
Interval 2.8 to 578.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 28Population: Population included all enrolled participants evaluable in Phase 2. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than \[\<\] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia \<100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (\>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of \>100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=5 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 1 Day 28
|
20 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 2 (28 days) Day 28Population: Population included all enrolled participants evaluable in Phase 2. Here 'N' signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than \[\<\] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia \<100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (\>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of \>100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=3 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at Cycle 2 Day 28
|
66.7 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: End of study treatment (approximately 3 years)Population: Population included all enrolled participants evaluable in Phase 2.
Response rate (percentage of participants who achieved CR or CRi) was measured using international working group (IWG) criteria. Response rate is defined as complete remission (CR) or complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) in children with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. CRi is defined as morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than \[\<\] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia \<100,000/ microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (\>) 1,000/ microliter, platelet count of \>100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=8 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CR or CRi at End of Study Treatment
|
12.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusionPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in this study assessed for PK. Pharmacokinetic analysis was planned to be reported for the overall participants including Phase 1 and 2. Here 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified category.
Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration of Decitabine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
> 1 month to <= 2 years
|
118.4 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 17.6 to 1621.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
> 2 to <= 6 years
|
123.1 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 15.6 to 1012.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
> 6 to <= 12 years
|
148.7 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 16.5 to 1415.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Decitabine
> 12 to <= 16 years
|
151.4 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Interval 19.1 to 1303.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (28 days) Day 5: pre-infusion, 0.5 hour during infusion, end of infusion and at 5 min, 0.5 hour, 1 hour, and 2 hour after end of infusionPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in this study assessed for PK. Pharmacokinetic analysis was planned to be reported for the overall participants including Phase 1 and 2. Here 'n' signifies number of participants analyzed for specified category.
AUC is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of decitabine.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine
> 1 month to <= 2 years
|
124.8 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Interval 21.3 to 1708.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine
> 2 to <= 6 years
|
131.5 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Interval 19.3 to 1028.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine
> 6 to <= 12 years
|
158.9 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Interval 21.0 to 1508.0
|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Decitabine
> 12 to <= 16 years
|
162.4 nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Interval 24.2 to 1747.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From time of response to relapse, study completion/withdrawal, or death, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 monthsPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants who achieved CR or CRi response in Phase 2. There was insufficient data to perform Kaplan Meier analysis, therefore individual data for each evaluable participant was reported.
Duration of response is defined as weeks from date of first response to date of first relapse or date of death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=2 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Duration of Response
Participant 1
|
44.6 weeks
|
|
Phase 2: Duration of Response
Participant 2
|
6.3 weeks
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years 10 monthsPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants evaluable in Phase 2.
Overall response rate is defined as percentage of participants with complete remission (CR) +complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi)+partial remission (PR) per IWG Criteria. CRi: morphologic CR with residual neutropenia (less than \[\<\] 1,000/microliter) or thrombocytopenia \<100,000/microliter). CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (\>) 1,000/ microliter platelet count of \>100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment. PR: all the same hematologic values of a CR, but with a decrease of \>=50% of the percentage of blasts to 5% to 25% in the bone marrow aspirate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=8 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Overall Response Rate
|
37.5 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From enrollment to death or withdrawal, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 monthsPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in Phase 1 and Phase 2.
OS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to date of death from any cause. If the participant is alive or the vital status is unknown, the participant will be censored at the date the participant will be last known to be alive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Overall Survival (OS)
|
5.1 months
Interval 3.1 to 11.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From enrollment to progression/relapse, death, or withdrawal, whichever comes first, for up to approximately 3 years 10 monthsPopulation: Population included all enrolled participants in Phase 1 and Phase 2.
Event free survival is defined as the time from first dose of study drug to relapse from CR, death, or second malignancy for participants who achieved CR. CR is defined as morphologic leukemia-free state, with less than 5 percentage (%) blasts in aspirate sample with marrow spicules and with a count of greater than or equal to (\>=) 200 nucleated cells, plus absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than (\>) 1,000/ microliter platelet count of \>100,000/microliter and participant must be independent of transfusions for a minimum of 1 week before each marrow assessment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Event-Free Survival
|
1 days
Interval 1.0 to 348.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Approximately 3 years 10 monthsPopulation: The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). This outcome measure was planned to be reported for the overall participants including Phase 1 and 2.
TEAEs are defined as adverse events with onset or worsening on or after date of first dose of study treatment. An adverse event is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Decitabine (Dacogen) + Cytarabine
n=17 Participants
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1. The maximum tolerated dose identified in Phase 1 was administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|
|
Phase 1 and 2: Number of Participants Reporting Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
17 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Phase 1 (Cohort 1): Dacogen + Cytarabine
Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2: Dacogen + Cytarabine
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Phase 1 (Cohort 1): Dacogen + Cytarabine
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1.
|
Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2: Dacogen + Cytarabine
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 2 of Phase 1 and continued to receive (2 g/m\^2) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile Neutropenia
|
33.3%
3/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Complication Associated with Device
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung Infection
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Exfoliation
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Hyperpigmentation
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase 1 (Cohort 1): Dacogen + Cytarabine
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received decitabine 20 milligram per square meter (mg/m\^2) by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of each 28-day cycle) in Phase 1. In addition, participants received cytarabine 1 gram per square meter (g/m\^2) and 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of each 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Phase 1.
|
Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2: Dacogen + Cytarabine
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received decitabine 20 mg/m\^2 by intravenous infusion over 1 hour once daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 1 to Day 5 of a 28-day cycle) in Phase 1 and Phase 2. In addition, participants received cytarabine 2 g/m\^2 dose levels administered by intravenous infusion over 4 hours daily for 5 consecutive days (Day 8 to Day 12 of a 28-day cycle) for the determination of the maximum tolerated dose in Cohort 2 of Phase 1 and continued to receive (2 g/m\^2) in Phase 2.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
66.7%
6/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
100.0%
8/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile Neutropenia
|
55.6%
5/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
62.5%
5/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
66.7%
6/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
50.0%
4/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis Allergic
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Eye disorders
Keratitis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal Inflammation
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
33.3%
3/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth Haemorrhage
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue Haemorrhage
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
44.4%
4/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
62.5%
5/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter Site Haemorrhage
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Face Oedema
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema Peripheral
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
75.0%
6/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular Injury
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatomegaly
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
|
33.3%
3/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Jaundice
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypogammaglobulinaemia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterobacter Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatic Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung Infection
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Klebsiella
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonas Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Allergic Transfusion Reaction
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post Procedural Complication
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural Pain
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Adenovirus Test Positive
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
33.3%
3/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Albumin Decreased
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Investigations
Weight Decreased
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperferritinaemia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypermagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypernatraemia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperphosphataemia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
33.3%
3/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone Pain
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness Postural
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
22.2%
2/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Product Issues
Device Occlusion
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed Mood
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal Inflammation
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis Atrophic
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tachypnoea
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Butterfly Rash
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Decubitus Ulcer
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema Multiforme
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Lividity
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Petechiae
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus Generalised
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash Maculo-Papular
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Hyperpigmentation
|
11.1%
1/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/9 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Screening up to end of study (approximately 3 years 10 months)
The safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (DACOGEN). The AE data was planned to be analyzed separately for Phase 1 (Cohort 1) and combined for participants in Phase 1 (Cohort 2) and Phase 2.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER