Randomized Endo-Vein Graft Prospective

NCT ID: NCT01850082

Last Updated: 2021-12-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the most common major surgical procedure in the United States with over 300,000 cases performed each year. To restore blood flow to the heart, vascular conduits from another part of the body are procured to create a bypass around critically blocked coronary arteries. The left internal thoracic artery is the conduit of choice for CABG due to its superior long-term patency. However, almost all patients referred for CABG require additional grafts to provide complete revascularization. This necessitates the harvest of other vessels, most commonly the saphenous vein which is used almost ubiquitously in contemporary CABG with an average of two vein grafts per CABG procedure. In the last 10 years, Endoscopic Vein Harvesting (EVH) has been recommended as the preferred method over the traditional open harvesting technique (OVH) because it provides a minimally invasive approach. However, more recent investigations indicate potential for reduced long-term bypass graft patency and worse clinical outcomes with EVH. The long term impact of EVH on clinical outcomes has never been investigated on a large scale using a definitive, adequately powered, prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) with long-term follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

CSP #588 - REGROUP is a randomized, intent-to-treat, two-arm, parallel design, multicenter study. Cardiac Surgery Programs at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMC) with expertise in performing both EVH and OVH will be invited to participate in the study. Subjects requiring elective or urgent CABG using cardiopulmonary bypass with use of at least one SVG will be screened for enrollment using established inclusion/exclusion criteria. Enrolled Subjects will be randomized to one of the two arms (EVH or OVH) after an experienced vein harvester is identified and assigned. Intraoperative assessments will be collected and post-operative assessments will be completed 24 hours post-surgery. Additional assessments will be completed at the time of discharge or at the 30-day post-surgery date if the subject is still in the hospital. Assessment of leg wound complications will be completed at the time of discharge and at six-week post-surgery. Telephone follow-ups will occur at three-month interval post-surgery until the participating sites are decommissioned at the end of the trial period (which would be approximately 4.5 years after the site initiations). For long-term MACE outcomes, passive follow up for MACE events using VA databases (CPRS, VASQIP) will be performed centrally by the Study Chair's office for another 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Coronary artery disease CABG Coronary revascularization Endoscopic vein harvest Saphenous vein graft Graft failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoscopic Vein Harvest (EVH)

An endoscopic vein harvest allows a portion of vein from the inside of the leg to be removed through small incisions. This reduces the length of the incision by several inches. An endoscope, or video camera, is used to view the vein and remove the needed length.

Group Type OTHER

Vein Harvesting Procedures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Vein Harvesting is the traditional method of saphenectomy for CABG. It is performed under direct vision using a single long incision or, more commonly, multiple smaller incisions (referred to as "bridging" technique) along the course of the vein. This approach minimizes manipulation and direct trauma to the conduit but is associated with potential for discomfort and leg wound healing complications. Endoscopic Vein Harvesting is a minimally invasive procedure that was developed to eliminate the need for long incisions associated with OVH. EVH reduces the risk of wound infections and other leg wound complications but may be more traumatic to the conduit than OVH.

Open Vein Harvest (OVH)

Open vein harvesting is the traditional method for vein harvesting. It is performed under direct vision using a single long incision or, more commonly, multiple-smaller incisions (referred to as "bridging" technique) along the course of the vein.

Group Type OTHER

Vein Harvesting Procedures

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Open Vein Harvesting is the traditional method of saphenectomy for CABG. It is performed under direct vision using a single long incision or, more commonly, multiple smaller incisions (referred to as "bridging" technique) along the course of the vein. This approach minimizes manipulation and direct trauma to the conduit but is associated with potential for discomfort and leg wound healing complications. Endoscopic Vein Harvesting is a minimally invasive procedure that was developed to eliminate the need for long incisions associated with OVH. EVH reduces the risk of wound infections and other leg wound complications but may be more traumatic to the conduit than OVH.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vein Harvesting Procedures

Open Vein Harvesting is the traditional method of saphenectomy for CABG. It is performed under direct vision using a single long incision or, more commonly, multiple smaller incisions (referred to as "bridging" technique) along the course of the vein. This approach minimizes manipulation and direct trauma to the conduit but is associated with potential for discomfort and leg wound healing complications. Endoscopic Vein Harvesting is a minimally invasive procedure that was developed to eliminate the need for long incisions associated with OVH. EVH reduces the risk of wound infections and other leg wound complications but may be more traumatic to the conduit than OVH.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age years 18 years or older
* Elective or Urgent CABG-only
* Median sternotomy approach
* At least one coronary bypass planned using saphenous vein graft for conduit
* Experienced EVH/OVH harvester available for procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Combined valve procedure planned
* Moderate or severe valve disease (see definition of moderate/severe valve)
* Hemodynamically unstable or in cardiogenic shock
* Enrolled in another therapeutic or interventional study
* Off-pump CABG procedure planned
* Limited life expectancy \< 1 year
* History of lower extremities venous stripping or ligation
* Inability to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco A Zenati, MD MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System, Tucson, AZ

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

VA Boston Healthcare System Jamaica Plain Campus, Jamaica Plain, MA

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Campus of the VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville VA Medical Center, Asheville, NC

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Louis Stokes VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zenati MA, Gaziano JM, Collins JF, Biswas K, Gabany JM, Quin JA, Bitondo JM, Bakaeen FG, Kelly RF, Shroyer AL, Bhatt DL. Choice of vein-harvest technique for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the REGROUP trial. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):325-30. doi: 10.1002/clc.22267. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24633760 (View on PubMed)

Almassi GH, Quin JA, Stock EM, DeMatt EJ, Biswas K, Hattler B, Tseng E, Zenati MA. Impact of Oral Anticoagulation on Clinical Outcomes in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation. J Surg Res. 2024 Mar;295:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Nov 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38007859 (View on PubMed)

Gikandi A, Habertheuer A, Stock EM, Hirji S, Kinlay S, Tsao A, Butala N, Biswas K, Zenati MA. Anatomical SYNTAX score and major adverse cardiac events following CABG in the REGROUP trial. J Cardiol. 2024 May;83(5):348-350. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 17. No abstract available.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37977259 (View on PubMed)

Wagner TH, Hattler B, Stock EM, Biswas K, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG, Gujral K, Zenati MA. Costs of Endoscopic vs Open Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Secondary Analysis of the REGROUP Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2217686. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.17686.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35727582 (View on PubMed)

Shapeton AD, Leissner KB, Zorca SM, Amirfarzan H, Stock EM, Biswas K, Haime M, Srinivasa V, Quin JA, Zenati MA. Epiaortic Ultrasound for Assessment of Intraluminal Atheroma; Insights from the REGROUP Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Mar;34(3):726-732. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.053. Epub 2019 Nov 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31787434 (View on PubMed)

Zenati MA, Bhatt DL, Bakaeen FG, Stock EM, Biswas K, Gaziano JM, Kelly RF, Tseng EE, Bitondo J, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Haime M, Hattler B, DeMatt E, Scrymgeour A, Huang GD; REGROUP Trial Investigators. Randomized Trial of Endoscopic or Open Vein-Graft Harvesting for Coronary-Artery Bypass. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):132-141. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812390. Epub 2018 Nov 11.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30417737 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

588

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id