Clinical Evaluation of the AmniSure ROM Test

NCT ID: NCT01847820

Last Updated: 2016-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

383 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To show that having less qualified personnel (non-Laboratory trained professionals) perform the test yields the same result as if a Laboratory trained professional performed the test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main goal of this study is to show that when performed by less qualified personnel, the AmniSure® ROM Test is so simple and accurate that the likelihood of erroneous results by the Intended-User is negligible and that the test poses no unreasonable risk of harm to the patient if performed incorrectly.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rupture of Fetal Membranes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Symptomatic

Individuals with signs, symptoms or suspicion of membrane rupture at 11 to 42 weeks gestation that will receive the AmniSure ROM test.

AmniSure ROM test

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparison of AmniSure ROM test to clinical diagnosis of ROM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AmniSure ROM test

Comparison of AmniSure ROM test to clinical diagnosis of ROM.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects must be pregnant.
* Subjects must be between 18 and 50 years of age and have a gestational age of 11.0-42.0 weeks.
* Subjects reporting suspicion, signs, or symptoms suggestive of ROM, PROM, PPROM.
* Subjects providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects who have placenta previa.
* Subjects who have heavy vaginal bleeding.
* Subjects who have had digital vaginal examination immediately prior to evaluation for ROM.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

QIAGEN Gaithersburg, Inc

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California San Francisco- Fresno

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Kansas University Medical Center Research Institute, Inc

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Johnson JW, Daikoku NH, Niebyl JR, Johnson TR Jr, Khouzami VA, Witter FR. Premature rupture of the membranes and prolonged latency. Obstet Gynecol. 1981 May;57(5):547-56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7219903 (View on PubMed)

LEBHERZ TB, HELLMAN LP, MADDING R, ANCTIL A, ARJE SL. DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY OF PREMATURE RUPTURE OF THE MEMBRANES. A REPORT OF 1,896 CASES. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1963 Sep 15;87:218-25. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(63)90502-7. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14077618 (View on PubMed)

Gunn GC, Mishell DR Jr, Morton DG. Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970 Feb 1;106(3):469-83. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(70)90378-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4905833 (View on PubMed)

Sacks M, Baker TH. Spontaneous premature rupture of the membranes. A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Apr 1;97(7):888-93. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(67)90512-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6021103 (View on PubMed)

Daikoku NH, Kaltreider DF, Khouzami VA, Spence M, Johnson JW. Premature rupture of membranes and spontaneous preterm labor: maternal endometritis risks. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jan;59(1):13-20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7078844 (View on PubMed)

Christensen KK, Christensen P, Ingemarsson I, Mardh PA, Nordenfelt E, Ripa T, Solum T, Svenningsen N. A study of complications in preterm deliveries after prolonged premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Dec;48(6):670-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 825795 (View on PubMed)

Fayez JA, Hasan AA, Jonas HS, Miller GL. Management of premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Jul;52(1):17-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 683624 (View on PubMed)

Alexander JM, Cox SM. Clinical course of premature rupture of the membranes. Semin Perinatol. 1996 Oct;20(5):369-74. doi: 10.1016/s0146-0005(96)80003-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8912990 (View on PubMed)

Philipson EH, Hoffman DS, Hansen GO, Ingardia CJ. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: experience with latent periods in excess of seven days. Am J Perinatol. 1994 Nov;11(6):416-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994609.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7857433 (View on PubMed)

Lockwood CJ, Wein R, Chien D, Ghidini A, Alvarez M, Berkowitz RL. Fetal membrane rupture is associated with the presence of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 in vaginal secretions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;171(1):146-50. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(94)90461-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7518190 (View on PubMed)

Fuks et al. N-Dia Amnisure Abstract.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 80: premature rupture of membranes. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):1007-19. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263888.69178.1f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17400872 (View on PubMed)

Nisell H, Hagskog K, Westgren M. Assessment of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretion in cases of equivocal rupture of the membranes at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Feb;75(2):132-4. doi: 10.3109/00016349609033304.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8604598 (View on PubMed)

Atterbury JL, Groome LJ, Hoff C. Methods used to diagnose premature rupture of membranes: a national survey of 812 obstetric nurses. Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Sep;92(3):384-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00178-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9721775 (View on PubMed)

de Haan HH, Offermans PM, Smits F, Schouten HJ, Peeters LL. Value of the fern test to confirm or reject the diagnosis of ruptured membranes is modest in nonlaboring women presenting with nonspecific vaginal fluid loss. Am J Perinatol. 1994 Jan;11(1):46-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994535.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8155212 (View on PubMed)

Jeurgens-Borst AJ, Bekkers RL, Sporken JM, van den Berg PP. Use of insulin like growth factor binding protein-1 in the diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 Apr 10;102(1):11-4. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00560-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12039083 (View on PubMed)

Watanabe T, Minakami H, Itoi H, Sato I, Sakata Y, Tamada T. Evaluation of latex agglutination test for alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing rupture of fetal membranes. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1995;39(1):15-8. doi: 10.1159/000292368.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7534254 (View on PubMed)

Fujimoto S, Kishida T, Sagawa T, Negishi H, Okuyama K, Hareyama H, Makinoda S. Clinical usefulness of the dye-injection method for diagnosing premature rupture of the membranes in equivocal cases. J Obstet Gynaecol (Tokyo 1995). 1995 Jun;21(3):215-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.1995.tb01000.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8590356 (View on PubMed)

Birkenmaier A, Ries JJ, Kuhle J, Burki N, Lapaire O, Hosli I. Placental alpha-microglobulin-1 to detect uncertain rupture of membranes in a European cohort of pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jan;285(1):21-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-011-1895-9. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21475966 (View on PubMed)

Lee SE, Park JS, Norwitz ER, Kim KW, Park HS, Jun JK. Measurement of placental alpha-microglobulin-1 in cervicovaginal discharge to diagnose rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):634-40. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000252706.46734.0a.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17329514 (View on PubMed)

Eriksen NL, Parisi VM, Daoust S, Flamm B, Garite TJ, Cox SM. Fetal fibronectin: a method for detecting the presence of amniotic fluid. Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Sep;80(3 Pt 1):451-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1495705 (View on PubMed)

El-Messidi A, Cameron A. Diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes: inspiration from the past and insights for the future. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Jun;32(6):561-569. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34525-X.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20569537 (View on PubMed)

Hellemans P, Verdonk P, Baekelandt M, Joostens M, Francx M, Gerris J. Preliminary results with the use of the ROM-check immunoassay in the early detection of rupture of the amniotic membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1992 Feb 28;43(3):173-9. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(92)90170-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1563568 (View on PubMed)

Duff P & Lockwood, C. Diagnosis of Premature Rupture of Membranes.Up-to-Date, 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Di Renzo GC, Roura LC, Facchinetti F, Antsaklis A, Breborowicz G, Gratacos E, Husslein P, Lamont R, Mikhailov A, Montenegro N, Radunovic N, Robson M, Robson SC, Sen C, Shennan A, Stamatian F, Ville Y. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous preterm labor: identification of spontaneous preterm labor, diagnosis of preterm premature rupture of membranes, and preventive tools for preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 May;24(5):659-67. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.553694. Epub 2011 Mar 2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21366393 (View on PubMed)

Sayres W. Chapter D: Preterm Labor & Premature Rupture of Membranes, AAFP-ALSO, June 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Mercer B. Premature Rupture of the Membranes. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Galn HL, Jauniaux EM, Landon MB, Simpson JL, Driscoll DA, eds. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders-Elsevier; 2012: 663.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Mariona FG, Cabero L. Are we ready for a new look at the diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Apr;25(4):403-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.581715. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21627549 (View on PubMed)

Kurdoglu M, Kolusari A, Adali E, Yildizhan R, Kurdoglu Z, Kucukaydin Z, Kaya A, Kirimi E, Sahin HG, Kamaci M. Does residual amniotic fluid after preterm premature rupture of membranes have an effect on perinatal outcomes? 12 years experience of a tertiary care center. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Apr;281(4):601-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1147-4. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19521709 (View on PubMed)

Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Besimoglu B, Gungorduk OC, Yildirm G, Ark C, Sahbaz A. Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 hours later by oxytocin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;206(1):60.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.07.035. Epub 2011 Jul 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21924396 (View on PubMed)

Combs CA, Garite TJ, Maurel K, Mallory K, Edwards RK, Lu G, Porreco R, Das A; Obstetrix Collaborative Research Network. 17-Hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prolong pregnancy after preterm rupture of the membranes: early termination of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Dec 29;4:568. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-568.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22206581 (View on PubMed)

Derbent AU, Simavli SA, Kafali H, Turhan N. A comparison of subgroups of spontaneous preterm delivery: preterm labor with intact membranes and preterm premature rupture of membranes. Anatol J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 1: 1

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C13-ROM-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Amnioinfusion Initiative
NCT00787163 UNKNOWN PHASE3
PROMMO Trial: Oral Misoprostol vs IV Oxytocin
NCT04478942 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Provider RCT PROMOTE
NCT07126405 WITHDRAWN NA