Trial Outcomes & Findings for To Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in People With Vision Loss Due to Macular Edema (NCT NCT01846299)
NCT ID: NCT01846299
Last Updated: 2016-05-23
Results Overview
BCVA was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity (VA) testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
181 participants
Baseline, Month 2
2016-05-23
Participant Flow
A total of 181 participants were enrolled. Of these, 178 adults were randomized in a 2:1 ratio and considered for analysis. The 3 adolescent participants, non-randomized, received open-label treatment and were not included in the analyses. Therefore, the number enrolled = 181 differs from the number randomized = 178 in the participant flow.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
118
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
117
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Set
|
119
|
58
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
106
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol deviation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
To Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Ranibizumab in People With Vision Loss Due to Macular Edema
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=118 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Total
n=178 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.97 • n=5 Participants
|
61.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.55 • n=7 Participants
|
62.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.50 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 2Population: Full analysis set: The full analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
BCVA was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity (VA) testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) in Study Eye
|
5.7 letters
Standard Error 0.81
|
2.9 letters
Standard Error 0.89
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was considered for the analysis. The FAS. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants of the FAS, who had data at baseline and the specific post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that time point.
BCVA was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity (VA) testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in BCVA in Study Eye up to Month 2
Month 1 (n=116,59)
|
4.7 letters
Standard Error 0.70
|
1.4 letters
Standard Error 0.98
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in BCVA in Study Eye up to Month 2
Month 2 (n=114,59)
|
5.8 letters
Standard Error 0.76
|
2.8 letters
Standard Error 1.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants of the FAS, who had data at baseline and the specific post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that time point.
CSFT wasassessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 10 (n=103,50)
|
-114.1 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 131.12
|
-116.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 147.26
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 11 (n=101,49)
|
-112.1 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 124.00
|
-123.5 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 140.65
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 12 (n=103,50)
|
-121.0 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 124.67
|
-116.8 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 137.99
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 1 (n=112,59)
|
-83.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 127.45
|
-14.3 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 97.36
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 2 (n=112,59)
|
-82.5 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 140.06
|
-30.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 102.77
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 3 (n=113,59)
|
-86.5 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 136.43
|
-92.2 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 129.85
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 4 (n=109,57)
|
-94.5 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 141.55
|
-95.5 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 140.68
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 5 (n=105,57)
|
-98.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 136.28
|
-107.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 142.22
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 6 (n=109,54)
|
-110.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 133.10
|
-84.1 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 137.86
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 7 (n=105,52)
|
-113.3 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 130.84
|
-112.9 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 148.13
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 8 (n=105,51)
|
-113.1 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 127.11
|
-107.7 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 157.40
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CSFT) in Study Eye
Month 9 (n=105,52)
|
-111.6 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 127.99
|
-116.3 micrometers (um)
Standard Deviation 146.43
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants of the FAS, who had data at baseline and the specific post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that time point.
CSFV was assessed OCT. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 1 (n=112,59)
|
-0.296 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.4570
|
-0.032 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.3969
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 2 (n=112,59)
|
-0.276 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5362
|
-0.104 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.3958
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 3 (n=113,59)
|
-0.322 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5812
|
-0.348 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5075
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 4 (n=109,57)
|
-0.333 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5568
|
-0.378 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5436
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 5 (n=105,57)
|
-0.383 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5592
|
-0.401 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5893
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 6 (n=109,54)
|
-0.388 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5167
|
-0.344 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5530
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 7 (n=105,52)
|
-0.438 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5267
|
-0.438 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6098
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 8 (n=105,51)
|
-0.405 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5074
|
-0.421 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6484
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 9 (n=105,52)
|
-0.446 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6066
|
-0.444 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6210
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 10 (n=103,50)
|
-0.439 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6241
|
-0.433 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6407
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 11 (n=101,49)
|
-0.406 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.4871
|
-0.459 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.6157
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Subfield Volume (CSFV) in Study Eye
Month 12 (n=103,50)
|
-0.447 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.4837
|
-0.455 microliters (ul)
Standard Deviation 0.5910
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: The FAS was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants (n), with values 'Absent' or 'Definite' for both the baseline and corresponding post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis.
The presence of intra-retinal fluid was assessed by OCT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 2, Absent (n=112,59)
|
98 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 2, Definite (n=112,59)
|
14 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 6, Absent (n=109,55)
|
97 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 6, Definite (n=109,55)
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 12, Absent (n=103,50)
|
78 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Intra-retinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 12, Definite (n=103,50)
|
25 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: The FAS was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants (n), with values 'Absent' or 'Definite' for both the baseline and corresponding post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis.
The presence of subretinal fluid was assessed by OCT.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 2, Absent (n=113,59)
|
77 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 2, Definite (n=110,55)
|
36 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 6, Absent (n=109,55)
|
75 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 6, Definite (n=109,55)
|
35 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 12, Absent (n=104,50)
|
77 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Presence or Absence of Subretinal Fluid in Study Eye Compared to Baseline
Month 12, Definite (n=103,50)
|
27 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2Population: The FAS was used this analysis. The FAS included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
The presence of active ME leakage was assessed by fluorescein angiography (FA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Presence of Active Macular Edema (ME) Leakage
|
96 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1Population: The FAS was used for this analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Rescue treatment with laser photocoagulation or periocular treatment could be administered at Month 1 only if the participant had a visual acuity loss of \> 5 letters due to disease activity from baseline to Month 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Treatment at Month 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (BL), month 1 through month 6, month 1 through month 12Population: The FAS was used for this analysis. The FAS included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study medication.
BCVA was assessed in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity (VA) testing charts at an initial testing distance of 4 meters. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Average Change From Baseline in BCVA
Average change from BL, month 1 through month 6
|
6.39 letters
Standard Deviation 8.405
|
4.50 letters
Standard Deviation 8.095
|
—
|
|
Average Change From Baseline in BCVA
Average change from BL, month 1 through month 12
|
7.40 letters
Standard Deviation 9.052
|
5.82 letters
Standard Deviation 8.927
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2, Month 6 , Month 12Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants of the FAS, who had data at baseline and the specific post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that time point.
VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 2, Gain of >= 15 letters (n=114,59)
|
26 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 2, Gain of >= 10 letters (n=114,59)
|
35 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 2, Gain of >= 5 letters (n=114,59)
|
55 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 2, Gain of >= 1 letter (n=114,59)
|
80 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 6, Gain of >= 15 letters (n=111,55)
|
30 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 6, Gain of >= 10 letters (n=111,55)
|
41 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 6, Gain of >= 5 letters (n=111,55)
|
67 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 6, Gain of >= 1 letters (n=111,55)
|
87 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 12, Gain of >= 15 letters (n=106,50)
|
44 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 12, Gain of >= 10 letters (n=106,50)
|
55 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 12, Gain of >= 5 letters (n=106,50)
|
72 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With ≥ 1, ≥ 5, ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 Letters Gain or Reaching 84 Letters
Month 12, Gain of >= 1 letters (n=106,50)
|
86 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 2, Month 6, Month 12Population: The full analysis set (FAS) was considered for the analysis. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Only participants of the FAS, who had data at baseline and the specific post-baseline time point, were included in the analysis for that time point.
VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using ETDRS-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=117 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=60 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 2, Loss of >1 letter (n=114,59)
|
17 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 2, Loss of >5 letters (n=114,59)
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 2, Loss of >10 letters (n=114,59)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 2, Loss of >15 letters (n=114,59)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 6, Loss of >1 letter (n=111,55)
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 6, Loss of >5 letters (n=111,55)
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 6, Loss of >10 letters (n=111,55)
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 6, Loss of >15 letters (n=111,55)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 12, Loss of >= 1 letter (n=106,50)
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 12, Loss of >= 5 letters (n=106,50)
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 12, Loss of >= 10 letters (n=106,50)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With > 1, > 5, > 10 and > 15 Letters Loss
Month 12, Loss of >= 15 letters (n=106,50)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12Population: The safety set was used for this analysis. The safety set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Two participants from the sham group were included in the ranibizumab group based on the actual treatment received.
The number of participants administered study treatments, according to treatment frequency, was assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=119 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=56 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
n=2 Participants
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 9
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 0
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 1
|
13 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 2
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 3
|
14 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 4
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 5
|
17 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 6
|
7 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 7
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 8
|
13 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 10
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 11
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ranibizumab Treatments
Frequency of injections = 12
|
20 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6, month 12Population: The safety set was used for this analysis. The safety set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Two participants from the sham group were included in the ranibizumab group based on the actual treatment received.
The number of participants, administered re-treatments according to treatment frequency, was assessed. Re-treatment was defined as an administration of study medication following at least one non-missed visit where treatment was not administered in the study eye. Up to Month 12, the maximum number of retreatments was 5.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=119 Participants
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=56 Participants
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
n=2 Participants
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 6, Frequency of re-treatment = 1
|
34 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 6, Frequency of re-treatment = 2
|
15 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 12, Frequency of re-treatment = 1
|
21 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 12, Frequency of re-treatment = 2
|
24 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 12, Frequency of re-treatment = 3
|
13 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 12, Frequency of re-treatment = 4
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Re-treatments
Month 12, Frequency of re-treatment = 5
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: The safety set was used for this analysis. The safety set included randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Two participants from the sham group were included in the ranibizumab group based on the actual treatment received.
The total number of primary reasons for decisions to treat was assessed. A single participant could have had multiple primary reasons for treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ranibizumab
n=689 Reasons
A 0.5 mg ranibizumab intravitreal injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then as needed based on evidence of disease activity.
|
Sham With Ranibizumab
n=372 Reasons
Sham injection was given to the study eye at baseline, and then treatment was given based on evidence of disease activity. At Month 1, if treatment was needed, sham was administered. At Month 2, participants could switch to open-label ranibizumab on an as needed basis.
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab
n=1 Reasons
Participants did not receive ranibizumab at any time during the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
OCT abnormality
|
637 Number of primary reasons
|
345 Number of primary reasons
|
1 Number of primary reasons
|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
Vision impairment
|
38 Number of primary reasons
|
22 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
FA abnormality
|
11 Number of primary reasons
|
5 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
Color fundus photography abnormality
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
Clinical abnormality
|
3 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
|
Number of Primary Reasons for Decision to Treat by Investigator
Without documentation (missing reason)
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
0 Number of primary reasons
|
Adverse Events
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=119 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=56 participants at risk
Sham with Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=2 participants at risk
Sham without Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic (Fellow treated eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic (Study eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal oedema (Fellow treated eye)
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Open angle glaucoma (Fellow untreated eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Open angle glaucoma (Study eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
General disorders
Hypothermia
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary colic
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endophthalmitis (Study eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster cutaneous disseminated
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Shunt stenosis
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Mobility decreased
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanoma
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Meningioma benign
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Basilar artery thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
50.0%
1/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Brain stem stroke
|
0.00%
0/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
50.0%
1/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Atelectasis
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
1.7%
2/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.84%
1/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=119 participants at risk
Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
Sham With Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=56 participants at risk
Sham with Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
Sham Without Ranibizumab 0.5mg
n=2 participants at risk
Sham without Ranibizumab 0.5mg
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage (Study eye)
|
9.2%
11/119
|
12.5%
7/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Cystoid macular oedema (Study eye)
|
5.0%
6/119
|
0.00%
0/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry eye (Study eye)
|
5.0%
6/119
|
1.8%
1/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain (Study eye)
|
8.4%
10/119
|
3.6%
2/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular oedema (Fellow untreated eye)
|
0.84%
1/119
|
5.4%
3/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular oedema (Study eye)
|
5.9%
7/119
|
3.6%
2/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced (Study eye)
|
9.2%
11/119
|
5.4%
3/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
5.0%
6/119
|
5.4%
3/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.1%
12/119
|
3.6%
2/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Investigations
Intraocular pressure increased (Study eye)
|
5.0%
6/119
|
5.4%
3/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
5.0%
6/119
|
3.6%
2/56
|
0.00%
0/2
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER