Trial Outcomes & Findings for Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for in Detecting Tumors During Treatment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer (NCT NCT01843673)

NCT ID: NCT01843673

Last Updated: 2016-07-06

Results Overview

The automated patient setup procedure varies between 'OBI', 'CBCT' or 'Exactrac' imaging technologies. Each procedure gives two shifts: 'vertical' and 'lateral'. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the shifts recommended by each pair of automated patient setup procedures. Average and Std deviation of vertical and lateral motion from the three systems were computed. P value, 1.00, refers to the test of difference of each system with OBI being more than 2 mm. Pairwise comparison for each direction between each pair of technologies were done using a t test to check if the difference in the recommended shift is more than 2 mm. The reported mean value represents the shift from planned treatment position averaged over all daily treatment setups. A negative mean vertical value indicates the patient was consistently set up posterior to plan; a negative mean lateral value indicates a set up consistently right of plan.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

16 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

up to 7 weeks

Results posted on

2016-07-06

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)
Patients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART. computed tomography: Undergo FBCT cone-beam computed tomography: Undergo dual CBCT radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI electronic portal imaging: Undergo EPID imaging image-guided adaptive radiation therapy: Undergo IGART
Overall Study
STARTED
16
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)
Patients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART. computed tomography: Undergo FBCT cone-beam computed tomography: Undergo dual CBCT radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI electronic portal imaging: Undergo EPID imaging image-guided adaptive radiation therapy: Undergo IGART
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
4

Baseline Characteristics

Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for in Detecting Tumors During Treatment in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)
n=16 Participants
Patients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART. computed tomography: Undergo FBCT cone-beam computed tomography: Undergo dual CBCT radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI electronic portal imaging: Undergo EPID imaging image-guided adaptive radiation therapy: Undergo IGART
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
16 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 7 weeks

Population: Ten evaluable head and neck patients treated with external beam radiation therapy received 19 to 32 fractions with all three imaging techniques. The mean daily shift of these 19 to 32 fractions were recorded for each technique. Statistical significance is determined based on 5% level of significance.

The automated patient setup procedure varies between 'OBI', 'CBCT' or 'Exactrac' imaging technologies. Each procedure gives two shifts: 'vertical' and 'lateral'. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the shifts recommended by each pair of automated patient setup procedures. Average and Std deviation of vertical and lateral motion from the three systems were computed. P value, 1.00, refers to the test of difference of each system with OBI being more than 2 mm. Pairwise comparison for each direction between each pair of technologies were done using a t test to check if the difference in the recommended shift is more than 2 mm. The reported mean value represents the shift from planned treatment position averaged over all daily treatment setups. A negative mean vertical value indicates the patient was consistently set up posterior to plan; a negative mean lateral value indicates a set up consistently right of plan.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Orthogonal Varian kV OBI Image
n=10 Participants
Patients are first set up for treatment with surface fiducial marks and followed by an automated image guided alignment procedure to achieve better alignment with the planning image. The automated procedure OBI gives two shifts: vertical and lateral. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the vertical and lateral shifts recommended by each pair of automated procedures.
Varian CBCT (Cone Beam CT) Imaging
n=10 Participants
Patients are first set up for treatment with surface fiducial marks and followed by an automated image guided alignment procedure to achieve better alignment with the planning image. The automated procedure CBCT gives two shifts: vertical and lateral. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the vertical and lateral shifts recommended by each pair of automated procedures.
Oblique Brainlab ExacTrac Images
n=10 Participants
Patients are first set up for treatment with surface fiducial marks and followed by an automated image guided alignment procedure to achieve better alignment with the planning image. The automated procedure ExacTrac gives two shifts: vertical and lateral. In the absence of a gold standard, our goal is to compare the vertical and lateral shifts recommended by each pair of automated procedures.
Differences of Calculated Set up Errors of 2 mm Between the Different Imaging Technologies
Vertical shift
-1.2 mm
Standard Deviation 3.1
-0.8 mm
Standard Deviation 3.4
-1.8 mm
Standard Deviation 3.2
Differences of Calculated Set up Errors of 2 mm Between the Different Imaging Technologies
Lateral shift
-1.5 mm
Standard Deviation 3.3
-1.1 mm
Standard Deviation 3.3
1.3 mm
Standard Deviation 3.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 7 weeks

Population: No data analyzed due to staff leaving primary institution.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 7 weeks

Population: No data analyzed due to staff leaving primary institution.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)
n=16 participants at risk
Patients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART. computed tomography: Undergo FBCT cone-beam computed tomography: Undergo dual CBCT radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI electronic portal imaging: Undergo EPID imaging image-guided adaptive radiation therapy: Undergo IGART
Infections and infestations
SEPSIS-ASSOCIATED ORGAN DYSFUNCTION
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Reporting were collected up to 7 weeks while the patient was undergoing the course of radiation therapy. No adverse events occurred due to additional xray imaging from this study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Diagnostic (Imaging Technology)
n=16 participants at risk
Patients undergo FBCT once before treatment and once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, dual CBCT up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans, 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI once weekly for a total of 6-7 scans, and EPID imaging up to 5 times weekly for a total of 33-35 scans while undergoing IGART. computed tomography: Undergo FBCT cone-beam computed tomography: Undergo dual CBCT radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian kV OBI radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Brain Lab ExacTrac radiography: Undergo 2-D x-ray with Varian MV OBI electronic portal imaging: Undergo EPID imaging image-guided adaptive radiation therapy: Undergo IGART
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Below normal Glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Reporting were collected up to 7 weeks while the patient was undergoing the course of radiation therapy. No adverse events occurred due to additional xray imaging from this study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Elevated Creatinine
37.5%
6/16 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Event Reporting were collected up to 7 weeks while the patient was undergoing the course of radiation therapy. No adverse events occurred due to additional xray imaging from this study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Elevated Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN)
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Event Reporting were collected up to 7 weeks while the patient was undergoing the course of radiation therapy. No adverse events occurred due to additional xray imaging from this study.

Additional Information

Joshua Evans, Ph.D.

Virginia Commonwealth University

Phone: 804-628-0661

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place