Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Couple Support Intervention for Prostate Cancer (NCT NCT01842438)

NCT ID: NCT01842438

Last Updated: 2017-06-05

Results Overview

EPIC is a quality of life tool used in prostate cancer studies, focused on physical and sexual outcomes. It is validated with population norms. We used the sexual bother sub-scale as the primary outcome measure; score range 0-400. A higher score indicates better function/better outcome.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

86 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Basline (T0), immediate post-intervention (T1) and 6 Months (T2)

Results posted on

2017-06-05

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
T1: Immediately After the Intervention
STARTED
42
44
T1: Immediately After the Intervention
COMPLETED
36
36
T1: Immediately After the Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
6
8
T2: 6month Follow-up
STARTED
36
36
T2: 6month Follow-up
COMPLETED
32
32
T2: 6month Follow-up
NOT COMPLETED
4
4

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
T1: Immediately After the Intervention
Withdrawal by Subject
6
8
T2: 6month Follow-up
Withdrawal by Subject
4
3
T2: 6month Follow-up
Death
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

A Couple Support Intervention for Prostate Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
n=42 Participants
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
n=44 Participants
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
Total
n=86 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
64.15 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.885 • n=5 Participants
63.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.800 • n=7 Participants
63.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.772 • n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
22 participants
n=5 Participants
22 participants
n=7 Participants
44 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
20 participants
n=5 Participants
22 participants
n=7 Participants
42 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
42 participants
n=5 Participants
44 participants
n=7 Participants
86 participants
n=5 Participants
EPIC sexual bother subscale (prostate-specific quality of life)
24.11 units on a scale
n=5 Participants
20.45 units on a scale
n=7 Participants
22.28 units on a scale
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Basline (T0), immediate post-intervention (T1) and 6 Months (T2)

Population: Primary outcome was at T1, sample size at T1, n=21 intervention, n=22 control. Sample size at T2, n=13 intervention, n=14 control At T1 (immediate follow-up) 3 intervention patients had withdrawn and 4 control patients had withdrawn. The scale was completed only by patients (all of whom were men, by as study focused on prostate cancer).

EPIC is a quality of life tool used in prostate cancer studies, focused on physical and sexual outcomes. It is validated with population norms. We used the sexual bother sub-scale as the primary outcome measure; score range 0-400. A higher score indicates better function/better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
n=21 Participants
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
n=22 Participants
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
Control: Patient Group
Did not receive the intervention. All males
Control: Partners
Did not receive the intervention; mostly females, but one male as there was one same-sex couple participating.
EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite), Sexual Bother Subscale
Patients T2
30.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.12
29.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.41
EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite), Sexual Bother Subscale
Patients T0
24.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.38
20.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.14
EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite), Sexual Bother Subscale
Patients T1
44.092 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.42833
26.3889 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.243

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Basline (T0), immediate post-intervention (T1) and 6 Months (T2)

Population: Data received at each time-point was T0: intervention, T1: immediately after intervention; T2 6months post intervention.

The HADS has two scales: one anxiety and one depression. It is validated with population norms. Results are presented for T2 (6 month follow-up) and split by Patient, Partner and again by Intervention, Control. Responses are scored on a scale of 0-3 (3 indicates higher symptom frequencies. Scores for each subscale (anxiety and depression) range from 0 to 21 with scores categorized as follows: normal 0-7, mild 8-10, moderate 11-14, and severe 15-21. Scores for the entire scale (emotional distress) range from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating more distress.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
n=21 Participants
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
n=21 Participants
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
Control: Patient Group
n=22 Participants
Did not receive the intervention. All males
Control: Partners
n=22 Participants
Did not receive the intervention; mostly females, but one male as there was one same-sex couple participating.
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
HADS total (T0)
10.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.87
11.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.842
9.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.406
8.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.69
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Anxiety subscale only (T0)
6.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.146
7.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.59
6.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.12
5.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.57
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Depression subscale only (T0)
4.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
3.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.84
3.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
HADS total (T1)
7.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.92
6.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.95
8.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.20
8.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Anxiety subscale only (T1)
4.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.42
5.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.60
5.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.11
6.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.99
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Depression subscale only (T1)
3.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.22
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.02
3.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.46
2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
HADS total (T2)
7.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.980
5.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.586
10.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.624
9.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.250
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Anxiety subscale only (T2)
4.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.197
4.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.674
6.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.885
6.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.510
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Depression subscale only (T2)
3.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.365
1.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.082
3.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.646
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.324

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Basline (T0), immediate post-intervention (T1) and 6 Months (T2)

Population: Data received at each time-point was T0: intervention 42, control: 43; T1: intervention 36, control 36; T2 (as above) intervention 28, control 32

SCORE15 is an index of Family Function and Change, with 15 items. The potential range of scores is 15 to 75, with a lower score indicating higher family functioning. Total scores are reported in the data below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention
n=28 Participants
6-sessions of couple support focused on relationships and psychosexual functioning Behavioral: psychosexual intervention
Control
n=32 Participants
This group will not receive the intervention during the life-span of the project
Control: Patient Group
Did not receive the intervention. All males
Control: Partners
Did not receive the intervention; mostly females, but one male as there was one same-sex couple participating.
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Patients T0
22.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.825
27.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.934
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Partners T0
24.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.357
25.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.986
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Patients T1
22.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.181
27.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.377
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Partners T1
22.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.221
22.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.807
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Patients T2
25.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.550
29.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.402
SCORE15 (Systemic Core Outcome Measure)
Partners T2
21.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.868
24.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.423

Adverse Events

Behavioral: Psychosexual Intervention

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Prof Liz Forbat, PI

Australian Catholic University

Phone: +61 475978476

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place