Dual Point-of-care Test for the Diagnosis of Yaws

NCT ID: NCT01841203

Last Updated: 2014-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

703 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A dual POC immunoassay simultaneously detecting non-treponemal and treponemal antibodies was developed for the diagnosis of infections with T. pallidum. The assay is designed for use in resource-limited settings where challenging conditions (such as lack of electricity, running water, or laboratory equipment) commonly exist. We sought to compare performance of the dual-POC assay for diagnosis of yaws infection with that of the RPR and TPHA as reference standards.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Yaws is an infectious disease caused by Treponema pallidum subspecies pertenue, a bacterium which closely resembles the causative agent of syphilis, and is spread by skin to skin contact. In the field, yaws is diagnosed on the basis of epidemiological context, evocative symptoms and signs and positive serological tests or dark field microscopy. The darkfield microscopy is not easy to perform , hence the interest in serological tests. The serological tests used to confirm yaws are the same as those used to diagnose syphilis. Yaws serologic diagnosis relies on testing for non-treponemal and treponemal antibodies. These antibodies differ markedly with respect to antigenic reactivities and kinetics during the disease process.

Historically screening for yaws has involved the use of nontreponemal tests, such as rapid plasma reagin or venereal disease research laboratory. Positive results of nontreponemal tests of specimens are then confirmed using a more specific treponemal test, such as Treponema pallidum haemagglutination. However, the equipment and personnel requirements for conducting and interpreting these laboratory-tests are rarely available in low-resource settings in developing countries where yaws occurs.

Rapid treponemal tests which detect antibodies to T. pallidum antigen have become popular for the diagnosis of venereal syphilis due to their many advantages. These tests that can be performed outside a laboratory setting with minimal training and using blood collected by a finger prick, which makes them extremely useful in remote areas where laboratories are not available. However, the rapid treponemal tests for syphilis detect treponemal antibodies, which limits their use for interpretation of the disease status since they cannot distinguish between active and past or treated infection.

A combined point-of-care (POC) test which detects both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies has recently been evaluated for the diagnosis of syphilis, and appears promising for yaws diagnosis. The use of the dual POC test would result in the ability to both screen and confirm the serological status of patients with suspected yaws within 15 minutes and give a better indication of active disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Yaws

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DPP/RPR-TPHA comparison

The evaluation of T1 (treponemal line) will be conducted by using the T1 positivity identified by naked eye or automated reader to compare with that of TPHA; while the evaluation of T2 (non-treponemal line) will be conducted by using the T2 positivity identified by naked eye, or automatic reader at cut-off value of 20, to compare with the result of RPR.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children from 2 to 15 years with clinical suspicion of active yaws

Exclusion Criteria

* Persons who are unable to sustain venipuncture; persons who do not provide an informed consent, or withdraw consent
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Papua New Guinea National Department of Health, Disease Control

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Divine Word University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Barcelona Centre for International Health Research

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oriol Mitja

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Oriol Mitja

MD

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karkar Island

Marup Village, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea

Site Status

Lihir Medical Centre

Londolovit, New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Papua New Guinea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ayove T, Houniei W, Wangnapi R, Bieb SV, Kazadi W, Luke LN, Manineng C, Moses P, Paru R, Esfandiari J, Alonso PL, de Lazzari E, Bassat Q, Mabey D, Mitja O. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid point-of-care test for active yaws: a comparative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jul;2(7):e415-21. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70231-1. Epub 2014 May 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25103395 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YARADI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id