Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
703 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-04-30
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Historically screening for yaws has involved the use of nontreponemal tests, such as rapid plasma reagin or venereal disease research laboratory. Positive results of nontreponemal tests of specimens are then confirmed using a more specific treponemal test, such as Treponema pallidum haemagglutination. However, the equipment and personnel requirements for conducting and interpreting these laboratory-tests are rarely available in low-resource settings in developing countries where yaws occurs.
Rapid treponemal tests which detect antibodies to T. pallidum antigen have become popular for the diagnosis of venereal syphilis due to their many advantages. These tests that can be performed outside a laboratory setting with minimal training and using blood collected by a finger prick, which makes them extremely useful in remote areas where laboratories are not available. However, the rapid treponemal tests for syphilis detect treponemal antibodies, which limits their use for interpretation of the disease status since they cannot distinguish between active and past or treated infection.
A combined point-of-care (POC) test which detects both treponemal and non-treponemal antibodies has recently been evaluated for the diagnosis of syphilis, and appears promising for yaws diagnosis. The use of the dual POC test would result in the ability to both screen and confirm the serological status of patients with suspected yaws within 15 minutes and give a better indication of active disease.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DPP/RPR-TPHA comparison
The evaluation of T1 (treponemal line) will be conducted by using the T1 positivity identified by naked eye or automated reader to compare with that of TPHA; while the evaluation of T2 (non-treponemal line) will be conducted by using the T2 positivity identified by naked eye, or automatic reader at cut-off value of 20, to compare with the result of RPR.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research
OTHER_GOV
Papua New Guinea National Department of Health, Disease Control
UNKNOWN
Divine Word University
UNKNOWN
Barcelona Centre for International Health Research
OTHER
Oriol Mitja
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Oriol Mitja
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karkar Island
Marup Village, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea
Lihir Medical Centre
Londolovit, New Ireland Province, Papua New Guinea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayove T, Houniei W, Wangnapi R, Bieb SV, Kazadi W, Luke LN, Manineng C, Moses P, Paru R, Esfandiari J, Alonso PL, de Lazzari E, Bassat Q, Mabey D, Mitja O. Sensitivity and specificity of a rapid point-of-care test for active yaws: a comparative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jul;2(7):e415-21. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70231-1. Epub 2014 May 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
YARADI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id