A Pilot Study on the Use of a Sensory Panel to Assess Comfort Between Three Different Contact Lenses

NCT ID: NCT01840787

Last Updated: 2015-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

As new contact lens products continue to be developed and improved, it's becoming harder for some individuals to tell whether one product is different from another. In addition, not everyone has the same level of sensitivity of their eyes, making it difficult for these judgments to be made. The purpose of this study is to explore the idea of using a pre-determined "expert panel" of individuals who are able to tell differences between contact lenses based on their comfort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

As technology continues to advance, contact lenses and lens care products are becoming harder to differentiate. In addition, assessing comfort in clinical trials is complicated, with full-masking behind hard to achieve and the psychology of the participant having unknown impact on the results. While the development of a reliable system to assess comfort would be beneficial for the research and development of new products, the use of a "sensory panel" itself may also lead to a better understanding of the drivers of discomfort at the end of the day.

The objective of the study is to explore the use of a sensory panel, defined as individuals who have a good correlation between subjective and objective measures of discomfort, at rating the comfort of various contact lenses.

The hypothesis is that in the "discriminative" group, the matrix of paired comparisons (between lens dissimilarity) is related to the ranked comfort of the lenses, while for the "poorly discriminative" group, the matrix of the dissimilarities will be random. An additional hypothesis is that the "discriminative" group will be less random than the entire group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye Syndromes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Contralateral lens comfort comparisons

Subjects will be randomized into receiving balafilcon A (8.3), or balafilcon A (8.6), or senofilcon A in one eye, and balafilcon A (8.3), or balafilcon A (8.6), or senofilcon A in the other eye.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

balafilcon A (8.6)

Intervention Type DEVICE

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

balafilcon A (8.3)

Intervention Type DEVICE

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

senofilcon A

Intervention Type DEVICE

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

balafilcon A (8.6)

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

Intervention Type DEVICE

balafilcon A (8.3)

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

Intervention Type DEVICE

senofilcon A

To be worn for 8 hours in one eye, and its comfort compared to another lens on another eye.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bausch & Lomb PureVision 8.6 Bausch & Lomb PureVision 8.3 Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
* Has read and signed an information consent letter;
* Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
* Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer;
* Has a contact lens prescription between +4.00 to -6.00D;
* Has astigmatism \<= 1.00D;
* Has vision of 20/40 or better in both eyes when wearing contact lenses

Exclusion Criteria

* Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
* Has any known active ocular disease and/or infection;
* Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
* Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
* Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study;
* Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment, determined verbally;
* Is aphakic;
* Has undergone refractive surgery;
* Is an employee of the Centre for Contact Lens Research;
* Has anisometropia of \>=1.00D
* Has a difference in comfort of 20 (on a 0-100 scale) between eyes when not wearing contact lenses.
Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Alcon Research

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Waterloo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Trefford Simpson, DipOptom

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Waterloo School of Optometry & Vision Science

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo School of Optometry & Vision Science

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18801

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id