Trial Outcomes & Findings for Utility of Novel BRAF Test for Melanoma (NCT NCT01840527)
NCT ID: NCT01840527
Last Updated: 2024-09-04
Results Overview
The specificity and sensitivity of the blood-based assay will be determined vis-à-vis tissue-based BRAF analysis in patients with advanced and high-risk melanoma in order to provide BRAF-directed therapy when indicated. The sensitivity of an assay is expressed as the probability (as a percentage) that a sample tests positive for BRAF mutation given that the participant has BRAF mutation; it is used to assess the risk of false negative results. A percentage greater than 50% indicates that the test is a better predictor of sample diagnosis than random chance.
COMPLETED
220 participants
2 years
2024-09-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Advanced Melanoma
For patients in the advanced melanoma cohort, a one-time blood sample will be obtained prior to the commencement of systemic therapy at a time when standard-of-care blood will be drawn. While it is ideal to obtain samples prior to any systemic therapy, participants who have previously received therapy, have progressed, and are in need of additional therapy will be considered suitable for participation. Participants with known BRAF mutation (determined by standard of care tissue testing) will undergo blood draws every 4 weeks (+/- 1 week) and at the time of disease progression.
|
Stage II/III Melanoma
For patients in the high-risk stage II/III cohort, a blood draw will be performed 4-8 weeks after the completion of surgical management at the time of standard of care blood work. In participants who sign informed consent prior to definite surgical management, a pre-operative blood draw may be obtained at the time that standard of care pre-op blood work is performed. Blood samples will then be obtained every three months following the initiation of either adjuvant therapy or routine, close follow-up for up to two years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
110
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
110
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Utility of Novel BRAF Test for Melanoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Advanced Melanoma
n=110 Participants
For patients in the advanced melanoma cohort, a one-time blood sample will be obtained prior to the commencement of systemic therapy at a time when standard-of-care blood will be drawn. While it is ideal to obtain samples prior to any systemic therapy, participants who have previously received therapy, have progressed, and are in need of additional therapy will be considered suitable for participation. Participants with known BRAF mutation (determined by standard of care tissue testing) will undergo blood draws every 4 weeks (+/- 1 week) and at the time of disease progression.
|
Stage II/III Melanoma
n=110 Participants
For patients in the high-risk stage II/III cohort, a blood draw will be performed 4-8 weeks after the completion of surgical management at the time of standard of care blood work. In participants who sign informed consent prior to definite surgical management, a pre-operative blood draw may be obtained at the time that standard of care pre-op blood work is performed. Blood samples will then be obtained every three months following the initiation of either adjuvant therapy or routine, close follow-up for up to two years.
|
Total
n=220 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59.8 years
n=5 Participants
|
59.7 years
n=7 Participants
|
59.7 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
202 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
210 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
110 participants
n=5 Participants
|
110 participants
n=7 Participants
|
220 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The study's primary outcome was not reached because the assay has not been successfully developed so no collected samples could be analyzed. More sensitive ctDNA approaches have made their way into commercial use including bespoke assays during the course of this study. The value of a highly-sensitive BRAF specific assay seemed less useful, and given the past troubles developing the current assay approach, the study team decided to apply the philanthropic funds to other projects.
The specificity and sensitivity of the blood-based assay will be determined vis-à-vis tissue-based BRAF analysis in patients with advanced and high-risk melanoma in order to provide BRAF-directed therapy when indicated. The sensitivity of an assay is expressed as the probability (as a percentage) that a sample tests positive for BRAF mutation given that the participant has BRAF mutation; it is used to assess the risk of false negative results. A percentage greater than 50% indicates that the test is a better predictor of sample diagnosis than random chance.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The study's primary outcome was not reached because the assay has not been successfully developed so no collected samples could be analyzed. More sensitive ctDNA approaches have made their way into commercial use including bespoke assays during the course of this study. The value of a highly-sensitive BRAF specific assay seemed less useful, and given the past troubles developing the current assay approach, the study team decided to apply the philanthropic funds to other projects.
The specificity and sensitivity of the blood-based assay will be determined vis-à-vis tissue-based BRAF analysis in patients with advanced and high-risk melanoma in order to provide BRAF-directed therapy when indicated. The specificity of an assay is expressed as the probability (as a percentage) that a test returns a negative result for BRAF mutation given that the that participant does not BRAF mutation; it is used to assess the risk of false positive results. A percentage greater than 50% indicates that the test is a better predictor of sample diagnosis than random chance.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The study's primary outcome was not reached because the assay has not been successfully developed so no collected samples could be analyzed. More sensitive ctDNA approaches have made their way into commercial use including bespoke assays during the course of this study. The value of a highly-sensitive BRAF specific assay seemed less useful, and given the past troubles developing the current assay approach, the study team decided to apply the philanthropic funds to other projects.
To explore the pharmacodynamic effects of MAPK pathway inhibitors (including selective BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, and ERK inhibitors) utilizing pre-and on-treatment peripheral blood BRAFV600E mutational testing in participants with advanced melanoma.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: The study's primary outcome was not reached because the assay has not been successfully developed so no collected samples could be analyzed. More sensitive ctDNA approaches have made their way into commercial use including bespoke assays during the course of this study. The value of a highly-sensitive BRAF specific assay seemed less useful, and given the past troubles developing the current assay approach, the study team decided to apply the philanthropic funds to other projects.
To define the prognostic value of peripheral blood BRAFV600 mutational testing in participants with Stage II/III melanoma
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Advanced Melanoma
Stage II/III Melanoma
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Ryan Sullivan
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place