Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Role of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) as an Adjuvant to Opioid Treatment in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Pain (NCT NCT01840345)

NCT ID: NCT01840345

Last Updated: 2018-05-14

Results Overview

The amount of opioid medication used was recorded. Then, it was converted to morphine equivalents (https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prescription-Drug-Coverage/PrescriptionDrugCovContra/Downloads/Opioid-Morphine-EQ-Conversion-Factors-March-2015.pdf). Opioid use was measured over a 2-week baseline period. Then, the average opioid medication use/week was calculated. This was compared to the average opioid medication use/week after 4 weeks of NAC.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

11 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, 4 weeks

Results posted on

2018-05-14

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Overall Study
STARTED
11
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

The Role of N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC) as an Adjuvant to Opioid Treatment in Patients With Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=11 Participants
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

The amount of opioid medication used was recorded. Then, it was converted to morphine equivalents (https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prescription-Drug-Coverage/PrescriptionDrugCovContra/Downloads/Opioid-Morphine-EQ-Conversion-Factors-March-2015.pdf). Opioid use was measured over a 2-week baseline period. Then, the average opioid medication use/week was calculated. This was compared to the average opioid medication use/week after 4 weeks of NAC.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=10 Participants
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Opioid Use
Baseline
101.24 morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 89.93
Opioid Use
4 weeks
104.56 morphine equivalent dose
Standard Deviation 96.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

Pain intensity will be measured by using the 100-point Visual Analogue Scale, a 100-mm horizontal line with anchors of "no pain at all" (at 0) and "worst pain imaginable" (at 100mm) on which patients' pain intensities are measured.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=10 Participants
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Pain
Baseline
6.38 mm on 100 mm scale
Standard Deviation 1.58
Pain
4 weeks
5.95 mm on 100 mm scale
Standard Deviation 1.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

Mood will be assessed by using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a validated 9-question assessment of depression with total scores ranging from 0-27. Higher score = worse depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=10 Participants
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Mood
4 weeks
9.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
Mood
Baseline
10.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks

Stress will be measured by the Perceived Stress Scale ((PSS), a 10-item instrument for measuring the perception of stress, with total scores ranging from 0-40. Higher scores = higher perceived stress

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=10 Participants
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Stress
Baseline
21.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
Stress
4 weeks
16.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4

Adverse Events

N-acetyl-L-cysteine

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 10 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
N-acetyl-L-cysteine
n=11 participants at risk
n-acetyl-l-cysteine 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks N-acetyl-l-cysteine: 1200 mg BID x 4 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
27.3%
3/11 • Number of events 4 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
36.4%
4/11 • Number of events 4 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastroesophageal reflux
45.5%
5/11 • Number of events 6 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Loss of appetite
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Endocrine disorders
Sweating
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Nervous system disorders
Sleepy
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 2 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Gastrointestinal disorders
chronic colonic ileus
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Nervous system disorders
Insomnia
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Knee pain
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • A physical examination was done at Baseline. Then, adverse events were assessed at each study visit throughout the study and follow-up periods.
All participants were asked about side effects and adverse events on a weekly basis, and any adverse events reported by the patients were evaluated by study staff.

Additional Information

Dr. Dace Svikis

Virginia Commonwealth University

Phone: (804) 827-1184

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place