Clinical Trial With Bupivacaine Lozenges as Local Anaesthesia Under Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
NCT ID: NCT01832675
Last Updated: 2013-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2013-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of a New Method for Analgesia
NCT00791024
Regional Anesthesia Block of the Transversus Abdominis Plane in Children Undergoing Gastric Tube Insertion
NCT00564655
Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine Infiltration for Postoperative Pain in Thyroid Surgery
NCT04427904
Local Anesthetics on Postsurgical Analgesia Following Posterior Colporrhaphy
NCT04032327
Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Bupivacaine Hydrochloride and Lidocaine During Suburethral Sling Placement
NCT02875015
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The clinical study was performed in the private gastrointestinal (GI) clinic at Hvidovre, Denmark. Before the UGE was performed the patient was locally anesthetized in the pharynx with a lidocaine spray as a standard treatment.
The hypothesis was that a bupivacaine lozenge would reduce the patient experienced discomfort during UGE due to a better local anesthetic effect compared to lidocaine spray. Moreover it is hypothesized that the bupivacaine lozenge would be more patient friendly than the lidocaine spray because of a better taste masking according to lesser bitter taste and a pleasant mode of being anesthetized.
The aim of the study was to compare patient discomfort by two different local anesthetic methods. The standard treatment was a lidocaine pharyngeal spray and was compared to the experimental treatment a bupivacaine lozenge. The efficacy and acceptance of the treatments were also examined, as well as the taste of the anesthetics. Furthermore the patient's and endoscopist's assessment of the UGE was examined.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bupivacaine lozenge
The patients will either get lidocaine spray or bupivacaine lozenge as an anaesthetic drug before the upper gastroscopic endoscopy.
Bupivacaine lozenge
25 mg bupivacaine/lozenge. The patient will get one lozenge 10-15 minutes before the examination.
Xylocain, cutaneous spray, solution
The patients will either get lidocaine spray or bupivacaine lozenge as an anaesthetic drug before the upper gastroscopic endoscopy.
Xylocain, cutaneous spray, solution
10 mg lidocaine/spray. The patient will be sprayed three times and get a maximal dose of 30 mg lidocaine just before the examination.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Xylocain, cutaneous spray, solution
10 mg lidocaine/spray. The patient will be sprayed three times and get a maximal dose of 30 mg lidocaine just before the examination.
Bupivacaine lozenge
25 mg bupivacaine/lozenge. The patient will get one lozenge 10-15 minutes before the examination.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 80 year
* Able to speak, read and understand the danish language
* Must be informed orally and released a written consent and a signed authorization statement
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy - the patient will be asked if she uses sufficient contraception. When in doubt a pregnancy test will be performed.
* Breastfeeding
* Use of other medicine before the examination besides the experimental medicine.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Oracain II Aps
UNKNOWN
Ove Andersen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ove Andersen
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kaare Nielsen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kirurgisk Klinik Hvidovre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kirurgisk Klinik Hvidovre
Hvidovre, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-0056-22-21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.