Impact of an Evidence-based Electronic Decision Support System on Diabetes Care

NCT ID: NCT01830569

Last Updated: 2019-07-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-29

Study Completion Date

2019-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of the use of an evidence-based decision support system (EBMeDS) in daily Belgian family medicine and to study the effectiveness of EBMeDS use on improving diabetes care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of the use of an evidence-based decision support system (EBMeDS) in daily Belgian family medicine and to study the effectiveness of EBMeDS use on improving diabetes care.

Specific research questions are:

* Does family physicians use the EBMeDS system in daily practice?
* Does the use of the EBMeDS system by family physicians leads to an improvement in diabetes control compared to the control group?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EBMeDS group

The regular Evidence Linker and the EBMeDS system will be available in this group.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

The EBMeDS system

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The EBMeDS system receives structured patient data from the electronic medical records in HealthOne and returns reminders, therapeutic suggestions and diagnosis-specific links to guidelines. Electronic forms and calculators (e.g. a calculator for glomerular filtration) are integrated in the system.

The original EBMeDS system was developed by Duodecim in Finland and covers a full spectrum of all clinical areas. Relevant reminders in all clinical areas are shown to the physicians in the intervention group.

Evidence Linker

Intervention Type OTHER

The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.

Control group

The regular Evidence Linker will be available in this group.

Group Type OTHER

Evidence Linker

Intervention Type OTHER

The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

The EBMeDS system

The EBMeDS system receives structured patient data from the electronic medical records in HealthOne and returns reminders, therapeutic suggestions and diagnosis-specific links to guidelines. Electronic forms and calculators (e.g. a calculator for glomerular filtration) are integrated in the system.

The original EBMeDS system was developed by Duodecim in Finland and covers a full spectrum of all clinical areas. Relevant reminders in all clinical areas are shown to the physicians in the intervention group.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Evidence Linker

The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients are 18 years or older.
* Patients have their electronic medical records registered by one of the included family physicians. Medical records are not centralized in Belgium. Patients are free to choose any physician, and can even see several physicians at the same time. To encourage a patient to have their medical records held by a single physician, 'Global Medical Records' werr introduced a decade ago. In return for a registration fee, patients can choose a main general practitioner who keeps their central medical records. This registration is a requirement for patient inclusion in the trial. Patients with 'Global Medical Records' are reimbursed a larger proportion of the consultation fees by the health insurance fund.
* Patients have an established diagnosis of diabetes at the baseline time point of the study (identified as having (1) an ICPC (International Classification of Primary Care) code of diabetes or (2) a prescription for a diabetes-specific or (3) the necessary labo results to confirm diabetes)

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Cognitive impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bert Aertgeerts

Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven

Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Heselmans A, Delvaux N, Laenen A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B. Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 7;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0955-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31910877 (View on PubMed)

Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Vander Stichele R, Aertgeerts B. Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based electronic decision support system for diabetes care in family medicine: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 5;8:83. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-83.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23915250 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S55183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diabetes Clinical Decision Support
NCT05447806 RECRUITING NA