Impact of an Evidence-based Electronic Decision Support System on Diabetes Care
NCT ID: NCT01830569
Last Updated: 2019-07-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-29
2019-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of an Electronic System to Support Clinical Decisions in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
NCT03160196
Validation of a Patient Decision Aid for Type 2 Diabetes
NCT02110979
Economic Evaluation of a Multistage Shared Decision-making Program for Type 2 Diabetes: a Pilot Study
NCT06410768
Web-based Education for Diabetes Patients on Adaptable Insulin Schedules
NCT01619592
Shared Decision Making Between Patients and GPs in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care.
NCT02285881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific research questions are:
* Does family physicians use the EBMeDS system in daily practice?
* Does the use of the EBMeDS system by family physicians leads to an improvement in diabetes control compared to the control group?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EBMeDS group
The regular Evidence Linker and the EBMeDS system will be available in this group.
The EBMeDS system
The EBMeDS system receives structured patient data from the electronic medical records in HealthOne and returns reminders, therapeutic suggestions and diagnosis-specific links to guidelines. Electronic forms and calculators (e.g. a calculator for glomerular filtration) are integrated in the system.
The original EBMeDS system was developed by Duodecim in Finland and covers a full spectrum of all clinical areas. Relevant reminders in all clinical areas are shown to the physicians in the intervention group.
Evidence Linker
The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.
Control group
The regular Evidence Linker will be available in this group.
Evidence Linker
The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The EBMeDS system
The EBMeDS system receives structured patient data from the electronic medical records in HealthOne and returns reminders, therapeutic suggestions and diagnosis-specific links to guidelines. Electronic forms and calculators (e.g. a calculator for glomerular filtration) are integrated in the system.
The original EBMeDS system was developed by Duodecim in Finland and covers a full spectrum of all clinical areas. Relevant reminders in all clinical areas are shown to the physicians in the intervention group.
Evidence Linker
The Evidence Linker is already integrated in Belgian routine practice since 2012 and could be considered as part of the usual care process. When entering a diagnosis coded in ICPC, relevant clinical practice guidelines are retrieved by the Evidence Linker and could by consulted on the initiative of the family physician.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients have their electronic medical records registered by one of the included family physicians. Medical records are not centralized in Belgium. Patients are free to choose any physician, and can even see several physicians at the same time. To encourage a patient to have their medical records held by a single physician, 'Global Medical Records' werr introduced a decade ago. In return for a registration fee, patients can choose a main general practitioner who keeps their central medical records. This registration is a requirement for patient inclusion in the trial. Patients with 'Global Medical Records' are reimbursed a larger proportion of the consultation fees by the health insurance fund.
* Patients have an established diagnosis of diabetes at the baseline time point of the study (identified as having (1) an ICPC (International Classification of Primary Care) code of diabetes or (2) a prescription for a diabetes-specific or (3) the necessary labo results to confirm diabetes)
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bert Aertgeerts
Prof. Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heselmans A, Delvaux N, Laenen A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Kunnamo I, Aertgeerts B. Computerized clinical decision support system for diabetes in primary care does not improve quality of care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 7;15(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0955-6.
Heselmans A, Van de Velde S, Ramaekers D, Vander Stichele R, Aertgeerts B. Feasibility and impact of an evidence-based electronic decision support system for diabetes care in family medicine: protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 5;8:83. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-83.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S55183
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.