Trial Outcomes & Findings for Brain Imaging of rTMS Treatment for Depression (NCT NCT01829165)

NCT ID: NCT01829165

Last Updated: 2018-04-10

Results Overview

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item clinician-administered assessment utilized as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Subscale scores are 0-2 (10 questions), 0-3 (2 questions), and 0-4 (12 questions). Subscales are totaled for an overall score (range 0 -76). For the overall score and all subscales, lower scores correspond to fewer symptoms, and higher scores correspond more symptoms.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

85 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline; Day 10; Day 20

Results posted on

2018-04-10

Participant Flow

85 participants were enrolled and 33 were randomized.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
rTMS Treatment
Rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Sham Treatment
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Overall Study
STARTED
20
13
Overall Study
COMPLETED
18
13
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
rTMS Treatment
Rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Sham Treatment
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Overall Study
Did not complete intervention
2
0

Baseline Characteristics

Brain Imaging of rTMS Treatment for Depression

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
rTMS Treatment
n=20 Participants
rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Sham Treatment
n=13 Participants
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
37.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=7 Participants
36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D 24)
27.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=5 Participants
26.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9 • n=7 Participants
26.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline; Day 10; Day 20

Population: Randomized and treated

The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item clinician-administered assessment utilized as a way of determining a patient's level of depression before, during, and after treatment. It takes approximately 15-20 minutes to complete the interview and score the results. Subscale scores are 0-2 (10 questions), 0-3 (2 questions), and 0-4 (12 questions). Subscales are totaled for an overall score (range 0 -76). For the overall score and all subscales, lower scores correspond to fewer symptoms, and higher scores correspond more symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
rTMS Treatment
n=20 Participants
rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Sham Treatment
n=13 Participants
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Clinician Administered HAM-D
Baseline
27.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
26.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
Clinician Administered HAM-D
Day 10
22.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
22.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.9
Clinician Administered HAM-D
Day 20
17.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
17.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Up to 3 months.

From pre- to post-treatment, improvement will be based on enhanced functional connectivity.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Up to 3 months

Implicit emotion regulation assessed through emotion conflict task performed during functional imaging. Performance based on reaction time and recruitment of emotion regulation regions during the task.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Up to 3 months.

From pre- to post-treatment of patients with high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS) improvement shall be measured by normalization of baseline network-level deficits.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

rTMS Treatment

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham Treatment

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
rTMS Treatment
n=20 participants at risk
rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Active 10 Hz rTMS was delivered using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images. Daily treatment regiments were to last 36.5 minutes and rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Sham Treatment
n=13 participants at risk
Sham rTMS was to be delivered for 20 sessions over 4 weeks. Placebo 10Hz rTMS was delivered through sham stimulation electrodes. The rTMS coil was positioned using neuro-navigation based on participants' own fMRI images, mimicking active rTMS treatment. Daily treatment regiments were to 36.5minutes and sham rTMS was delivered at 120% of the participant's motor threshold. Participants were monitored during the rTMS sham sessions for adverse events and/or side effects. Upon completing the sham 20 sessions participants are unblinded and offered 20 further treatments of guaranteed open-label treatment. The open-label treatment would follow the active rTMS treatment protocol. rTMS Treatment: MRI-compatible TMS stimulator
Nervous system disorders
Startled by rTMS device
5.0%
1/20 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population
0.00%
0/13 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population
General disorders
Abdominal Cramping Pain
0.00%
0/20 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population
7.7%
1/13 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/20 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population
7.7%
1/13 • Up to 9 months
Randomized and treated population

Additional Information

Amit Etkin, MD, PhD

Stanford University

Phone: (650) 725-5736

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place