LDK378 Versus Chemotherapy in ALK Rearranged (ALK Positive) Patients Previously Treated With Chemotherapy (Platinum Doublet) and Crizotinib

NCT ID: NCT01828112

Last Updated: 2025-02-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

231 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-28

Study Completion Date

2023-11-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of the study was to compare the antitumor activity of LDK378 vs. chemotherapy in patients previously treated with chemotherapy (platinum doublet) and crizotinib. Patients in the chemotherapy arm were given the option to switch to LDK378 after confirmed progressive disease (PD), while also had the choice to continue with pemetrexed treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 231 patients were randomized to one of the two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization was stratified by World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (0 versus 1-2) and whether the patient had brain metastases at screening. The study was planned to be ended once the final overall survival (OS) analysis was performed (at the earliest of approximately 196 deaths observed or statistical significance reached at earlier OS interim analysis).

Following an agreement between Novartis and European Medicines Agency (EMA) in May 2023 to terminate the trial earlier, this study was completed when the total number of deaths was 190. Patients who had Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined disease progression as confirmed by the Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC), but who, in the opinion of the Investigator, had continued clinical benefit from study treatment on either the chemotherapy arm or the ceritinib arm, continued to receive treatment. These patients continued assessments in the treatment phase. In addition, only patients randomized to the chemotherapy arm were allowed to crossover to receive ceritinib therapy (extension treatment \[ET\] phase) after BIRC-confirmed, RECIST-defined disease progression, and provided they met the eligibility requirements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ceritinib

Ceritinib 750 mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ceritinib

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceritinib was the investigational treatment and was provided as 150 mg hard gelatin capsules for oral use. The dose was 750 mg once daily.

Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy as determined by BIRC

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pemetrexed

Intervention Type DRUG

Pemetrexed was one of the chemotherapy treatments. Pemetrexed, a reconstituted solution, was intravenously administered over 10 minutes at 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.

Docetaxel

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel was one of the chemotherapy treatments. Docetaxel, a reconstituted solution, was intravenously administered over 1 hour, at 75 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ceritinib

Ceritinib was the investigational treatment and was provided as 150 mg hard gelatin capsules for oral use. The dose was 750 mg once daily.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pemetrexed

Pemetrexed was one of the chemotherapy treatments. Pemetrexed, a reconstituted solution, was intravenously administered over 10 minutes at 500 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel

Docetaxel was one of the chemotherapy treatments. Docetaxel, a reconstituted solution, was intravenously administered over 1 hour, at 75 mg/m\^2 every 21 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient has a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as assessed by the FDA approved Abbott FISH Test.
2. Patient has stage IIIB or IV diagnosis and must have received one or two prior regimens (including platinum- doublet) of cytotoxic chemotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
3. Patient has at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1. A previously irradiated site lesion may only be counted as a target lesion if there is clear sign of progression since the irradiation
4. Patients must have received previous treatment with crizotinib for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient with known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of LDK378 (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, crospovidone, colloidal silicon dioxide and magnesium stearate)
2. Patient with a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to pemetrexed or docetaxel or any known excipients of these drugs.
3. Patient with symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases who is neurologically unstable or has required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to screening to manage CNS symptoms.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Highlands Oncology Group

Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Memorial Cancer Institute

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cancer Specialists of North Florida

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

University Of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Marywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Uni Of Iowa Hospitals And Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Sarah Cannon Research Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology-Sugarland

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Oncology Cancer Care and Research Center

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Virginia Cancer Specialists

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Swedish Cancer Institute

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Marseille, Bouches Du Rhone, France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Suresnes, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Esslingen am Neckar, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pokfulam, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Limerick, Co Limerick, Ireland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Avellino, AV, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Monza, MB, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Milan, MI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Perugia, PG, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pisa, PI, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aviano, PN, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Reggio Emilia, RE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Roma, RM, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Orbassano, TO, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Verona, VR, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Akashi, Hyōgo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Okayama, Okayama-ken, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Hirakata, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ōsaka-sayama, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Koto Ku, Tokyo, Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Niigata, , Japan

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

El Achrafiyé, , Lebanon

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow Region Istra Village, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, Seocho Gu, South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Seville, Andalusia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

A Coruña, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Pendik Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Istanbul, TUR, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Aberdeen, Grampian Region, United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Belgium Canada France Germany Hong Kong Ireland Israel Italy Japan Lebanon Netherlands Portugal Russia Singapore South Korea Spain Switzerland Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kiura K, Imamura F, Kagamu H, Matsumoto S, Hida T, Nakagawa K, Satouchi M, Okamoto I, Takenoyama M, Fujisaka Y, Kurata T, Ito M, Tokushige K, Hatano B, Nishio M. Phase 3 study of ceritinib vs chemotherapy in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients previously treated with chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): Japanese subset. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;48(4):367-375. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy016.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29474558 (View on PubMed)

Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crino L, Gridelli C, Kiura K, Liu G, Novello S, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Mok T, Nishio M, Scagliotti G, Spigel DR, Deudon S, Zheng C, Pantano S, Urban P, Massacesi C, Viraswami-Appanna K, Felip E. Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):874-886. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30339-X. Epub 2017 Jun 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28602779 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-005637-36

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CLDK378A2303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.