Trial Outcomes & Findings for Preoperative Cognitive Screening of Elderly Surgical Patients (NCT NCT01826825)

NCT ID: NCT01826825

Last Updated: 2021-04-14

Results Overview

Potential baseline predictors of the MiniCog and CIB scores on a risk ratio scale, Clock in box 0-8, Mini-Cog 0-5, higher values represent better scores. For the Mini-cog a score of less than or equal to 2 suggests probable cognitive impairment. For the Clock in the box, a score of less than or equal to 5 suggests probable cognitive impairment. The number of participants that scored less than or equal to 2 on the Mini-cog or less than or equal to 5 on the clock in the box are presented in the data table

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

200 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Cognitive stratification occurred on the date the patient consented to the study at baseline. This data was presented in a publication in 2017 (Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):765-774.)

Results posted on

2021-04-14

Participant Flow

Patients were enrolled in the Preadmission Testing Center at BWH between 6/5/2013 and 7/31/2013 after completing the informed consent process.

2 patients initially agreed to participate in the study but then were called in for their preadmission appointment and were not enrolled.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Clock in the Box
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Overall Study
STARTED
100
100
Overall Study
COMPLETED
100
98
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Clock in the Box
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Overall Study
Two patients consented and randomized to Mini-Cog did not have the Mini-Cog administered
0
2

Baseline Characteristics

2 Patients withdrew

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Clock in the Box
n=100 Participants
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
n=100 Participants
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Total
n=200 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
0 Participants
n=100 Participants
0 Participants
n=200 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
100 Participants
n=100 Participants
100 Participants
n=100 Participants
200 Participants
n=200 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
50 Participants
n=100 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
50 Participants
n=98 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
100 Participants
n=198 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants
n=100 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
48 Participants
n=98 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
98 Participants
n=198 Participants • 2 Patients withdrew
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Cognitive stratification occurred on the date the patient consented to the study at baseline. This data was presented in a publication in 2017 (Anesthesiology. 2017 Nov;127(5):765-774.)

Population: Mini-Cog less than or equal to 2, clock in the box scores less than or equal to 5 suggests probable cognitive impairment

Potential baseline predictors of the MiniCog and CIB scores on a risk ratio scale, Clock in box 0-8, Mini-Cog 0-5, higher values represent better scores. For the Mini-cog a score of less than or equal to 2 suggests probable cognitive impairment. For the Clock in the box, a score of less than or equal to 5 suggests probable cognitive impairment. The number of participants that scored less than or equal to 2 on the Mini-cog or less than or equal to 5 on the clock in the box are presented in the data table

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clock in the Box
n=100 Participants
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
n=98 Participants
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Number of Patients With Probable Cognitive Impairment
23 Participants
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: duration of time undergoing preoperative evaluation in minutes.

Population: Study patients undergoing cognitive screening with either the MiniCog or Clock in the Box.

To evaluate the cost of cognitive screening in the preoperative testing center in terms of time and finances. We were unable to determine differences in cost and did not track time to administer specifically the screening tools but rather the time of the entire preoperative evaluation. We gathered information on time spent in the preoperative testing center between patients who had MiniCog or Clock-in-the box testing.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clock in the Box
n=82 Participants
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
n=84 Participants
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Cost of Cognitive Screening in Terms of Time and Finances
90 Minutes
Standard Deviation 38
90 Minutes
Standard Deviation 38

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: The data was obtained at the time of initial enrollment

Population: Patient perspective of preoperative cognitive screening. Because 2 patients randomized to the MIni-Cog arm were taken in for their preoperative assessment neither the Mini-cog screen and the survey on their perceptions on preoperative cognitive screening were obtained.

Results of a patient survey about their perceptions on preoperative cognitive screening on a yes / no basis

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clock in the Box
n=100 Participants
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
n=98 Participants
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
Do you believe a short memory test should be performed before having a surgical procedure? · Yes
71 Participants
71 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
Do you believe a short memory test should be performed before having a surgical procedure? · No
19 Participants
9 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
Do you believe a short memory test should be performed before having a surgical procedure? · Refused to answer
10 Participants
18 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If a memory test could help predict surgical outcomes would you want memory testing performed? · Yes
92 Participants
93 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If a memory test could help predict surgical outcomes would you want memory testing performed? · No
3 Participants
3 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If a memory test could help predict surgical outcomes would you want memory testing performed? · Refused to answer
5 Participants
2 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the results of memory testing suggested memory problems would you want to know? · Yes
93 Participants
93 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the results of memory testing suggested memory problems would you want to know? · No
5 Participants
5 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the results of memory testing suggested memory problems would you want to know? · Refused to answer
2 Participants
0 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the memory test suggested possible memory problems would you want a memory specialist referral? · Yes
80 Participants
75 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the memory test suggested possible memory problems would you want a memory specialist referral? · No
15 Participants
20 Participants
Patient Perceptions of Preoperative Cognitive Screening
If the memory test suggested possible memory problems would you want a memory specialist referral? · Refused to answer
5 Participants
3 Participants

Adverse Events

Clock in the Box

Serious events: 13 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Mini-Cog

Serious events: 18 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Clock in the Box
n=100 participants at risk
Results of the Clock in the box cognitive screening test. Cognitive Screen: Cognitive Screen
Mini-Cog
n=98 participants at risk
Results of the mini-cog cognitive screen Mini-Cog: Cognitive Screen
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
1.0%
1/98 • Number of events 1 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Reintubation
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
0.00%
0/98 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Nervous system disorders
Stroke
1.0%
1/100 • Number of events 1 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
0.00%
0/98 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Nervous system disorders
Delirium by Chart review
7.0%
7/100 • Number of events 7 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
8.2%
8/98 • Number of events 8 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Wound infection
0.00%
0/100 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
1.0%
1/98 • Number of events 1 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sepsis
0.00%
0/100 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
1.0%
1/98 • Number of events 1 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/100 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
3.1%
3/98 • Number of events 3 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
Surgical and medical procedures
Reoperation
2.0%
2/100 • Number of events 2 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.
4.1%
4/98 • Number of events 4 • In hospital, and up to 1 month postoperatively. This data was collected from the patients chart between 1 month and 2 months after their surgical procedure.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Deborah J. Culley, M.D., Principal Investigator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Phone: 6177327330

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place