Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in the Recurrence Prevention of Bipolar I Disorder (NCT NCT01825837)
NCT ID: NCT01825837
Last Updated: 2014-03-27
Results Overview
The CGI-BP scale is a modification of the CGI scale, which provides a means of assessing severity and treatment-related improvement in manic and depressive domains reflecting clinically relevant degrees of change. The concept of improvement refers to the clinical distance between the individual's current condition and that prior to the start of treatment. The scale for 'severity of illness' measures mania, depression and overall illness on a 7 point scale from 1 ('normal, not ill') to 7 ('very severely ill'). The scale for 'change from preceding phase' and 'change from worst phase' measures mania, depression, and overall illness on an 8-point scale from 1 (very much improved) to 8 ('not applicable'). If the patient, in 'change from preceding phase', at any visit during the double-blind, has a score of 5, 6, or 7 in any of 3 categories (mania, depression, or overall bipolar illness), then the illness will be considered to have worsened.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
104 participants
6 months
2014-03-27
Participant Flow
This was a multicenter study. Approximately 60 centers in Europe, South America, and South Africa enrolled patients in this study.
This was an extension study consisting of 2 parts. In Part I, all participants received open-label treatment with BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily for 2 weeks. Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
BIA 2-093 300 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
BIA 2-093 1800 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
ESL (Part I)
In Part I, all participants received open-label treatment with BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The participants that completed part I were randomised in Part II.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PART I
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
104
|
|
PART I
Enrolled
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
104
|
|
PART I
Safety Population (Open-Label)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
104
|
|
PART I
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
87
|
|
PART I
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
17
|
|
PART II
STARTED
|
35
|
26
|
26
|
0
|
|
PART II
Randomized Patients
|
35
|
26
|
26
|
0
|
|
PART II
Safety Population (Double-Blind)
|
35
|
26
|
26
|
0
|
|
PART II
Intent-to-Treat Population
|
34
|
25
|
26
|
0
|
|
PART II
Per-Protocol Population
|
32
|
23
|
24
|
0
|
|
PART II
COMPLETED
|
16
|
12
|
7
|
0
|
|
PART II
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
14
|
19
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
BIA 2-093 300 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
BIA 2-093 1800 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
ESL (Part I)
In Part I, all participants received open-label treatment with BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily for 2 weeks. The participants that completed part I were randomised in Part II.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PART I
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
|
PART I
Patient non-compliance
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
PART I
Treatment failure
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
|
PART I
reason unspecified
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
PART II
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
0
|
|
PART II
Patient non-compliance
|
5
|
2
|
4
|
0
|
|
PART II
Adverse Event
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
|
PART II
Treatment failure
|
6
|
4
|
5
|
0
|
|
PART II
reason unspecified
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Eslicarbazepine Acetate in the Recurrence Prevention of Bipolar I Disorder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
n=35 Participants
BIA 2-093 300 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
n=26 Participants
BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
n=26 Participants
BIA 2-093 1800 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
ESL (Part I - Not Randomised Patients)
n=17 Participants
This group corresponds to the 17 patients who did not complete part I and therefore where not randomised to any traeatment group.
|
Total
n=104 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
100 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsThe CGI-BP scale is a modification of the CGI scale, which provides a means of assessing severity and treatment-related improvement in manic and depressive domains reflecting clinically relevant degrees of change. The concept of improvement refers to the clinical distance between the individual's current condition and that prior to the start of treatment. The scale for 'severity of illness' measures mania, depression and overall illness on a 7 point scale from 1 ('normal, not ill') to 7 ('very severely ill'). The scale for 'change from preceding phase' and 'change from worst phase' measures mania, depression, and overall illness on an 8-point scale from 1 (very much improved) to 8 ('not applicable'). If the patient, in 'change from preceding phase', at any visit during the double-blind, has a score of 5, 6, or 7 in any of 3 categories (mania, depression, or overall bipolar illness), then the illness will be considered to have worsened.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BIA 2-093 300 mg
n=34 Participants
PART II - Intent-to-Treat Population
|
BIA 2-093 900 mg
n=25 Participants
PART II - Intent-to-Treat Population
|
BIA 2-093 1800 mg
n=26 Participants
PART II - Intent-to-Treat Population
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Showed no Worsening According to the Clinical Global Impression - Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Scale (Intent-to-Treat Population)
|
26 participants
|
14 participants
|
16 participants
|
Adverse Events
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
n=35 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 300 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
n=26 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
n=26 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 1800 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mania
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 3 [(Part II) 300 mg]
n=35 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 300 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 2 [(Part II) 900 mg]
n=26 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 900 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
Group 1 [(Part II) 1800 mg]
n=26 participants at risk
BIA 2-093 1800 mg once daily (Part II followed a double-blind, parallel-group design in which participants were randomly assigned to treatment with BIA 2-093 300 mg, 900 mg, or 1800 mg once daily). Study medication was administered orally, once daily in the evening.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Paraesthesia oral
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure systolic decreased
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
7.7%
2/26 • Number of events 2 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysarthria
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
11.5%
3/26 • Number of events 3 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/35 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
3.8%
1/26 • Number of events 1 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Mania
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
0.00%
0/26 • Double-blind period (Part II first administration date until study termination) 6 months
Part II Double-Blind Period (Safety Population): safety population included all patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product after randomization. Please note that adverse events that occurred in Parts I and II were summarized separately.
|
Additional Information
Head of Clinical Research Section
BIAL - Portela & Ca, SA
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER