Goal Setting for Health Behavior and Psychosocial Issues in Primary Care

NCT ID: NCT01825746

Last Updated: 2015-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3591 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this delayed cluster randomized intervention trial is to evaluate primary care strategies to increase goal setting, shared decision-making and evidence-based support and counseling for health behaviors and psychosocial issues through the implementation of a standard set of practical, patient-centered survey items and related decision support tools, called the My Own Health Report (MOHR) assessment. Nine pairs of diverse primary care practices will participate, four pairs of federally qualified health centers clinics and 5 pairs of practice based research network practices. Practice pairs are similar in size, patient and staff mix, culture, and level of EHR integration. Within pairs, practices will be randomized to early or delayed intervention (4 months later). The intervention consists of implementing the MOHR assessment and patient counseling into clinical care for all patients presenting for wellness or chronic care during a 6 month study period. Prior to implementation, practices will receive brief training about health behavior counseling, goal setting, and action planning. Practices will also be provided materials to support evidence-based counseling and referrals to local community resources. MOHR assessment implementation details will be determined by each practice pair but will generally include (1) asking patients to complete the MOHR assessment on the web prior to encounters (available at www.MyOwnHealthReport.org it addresses10 distinct health behaviors and psychosocial issues including physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, drug use, sleep, stress, depression and anxiety), (2) provision, via the tool, immediate patient feedback that includes identification of unhealthy issues, assessment of readiness to change, prioritization of issues to change, and preparation for goal-setting and action planning, (3) feedback to the primary care team on the patient status and priorities for change, (4) provision of counseling, goal setting, and referrals to local resources by clinicians during the subsequent office visit, and (5) follow-up with the clinicians and local resources as agreed upon by the patient and clinician. Data sources will include patient responses to the MOHR assessment, practice appointment records, and a patient experience survey mailed to the first 300 patients offered the MOHR assessment two weeks after their office visit. Primary outcomes will include the Reach and Effectiveness of the intervention. Reach will be assessed in early and delayed intervention sites when they field the MOHR assessment. Effectiveness will compare early and delayed intervention sites during the early intervention phase, allowing the delayed intervention sites to serve as controls. Reach outcomes will include the percent of eligible patients receiving and completing the MOHR assessment. Effectiveness outcomes will include the percent of patients reporting that they were asked about health topics, set a change goal, received assistance for making a change, were referred for local counseling and support, and/or made any changes. Additional outcomes will include maintenance of the MOHR assessment implementation beyond 4 months, changes in patient reported health behavior and psychosocial measures by repeated administration of the MOHR assessment 4 months after initial completion, qualitative assessments on implementation factors and context that influence outcomes, and cost, in terms of time and resources required for practices to implement the MOHR assessment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Behaviors Obesity Substance Abuse Anxiety Depression

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early implementation practices

9 practices that will initially field the MOHR assessment for up to 6 months. These practices will serve as "intervention" sites for the effectiveness outcomes measured by the patient experience survey.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Implementation of the MOHR assessment in primary care workflow

Intervention Type OTHER

The MOHR assessment includes (1) asking patients to complete the MOHR assessment on the web prior to encounters (available at www.MyOwnHealthReport.org it addresses10 distinct health behaviors and psychosocial issues including physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, drug use, sleep, stress, depression and anxiety), (2) provision, via the tool, immediate patient feedback that includes identification of unhealthy issues, assessment of readiness to change, prioritization of issues to change, and preparation for goal-setting and action planning, (3) feedback to the primary care team on the patient status and priorities for change, (4) provision of counseling, goal setting, and referrals to local resources by clinicians during the subsequent office visit, and (5) follow-up with the clinicians and local resources as agreed upon by the patient and clinician.

Delayed implementation practices

9 practices that will field the MOHR assessment for up to 6 months but starting 4 months after the early implementation practices. These practices will serve as "control" sites for the effectiveness outcomes measured by the patient experience survey. However, they will provide intervention data with respect to Reach and cost during the delayed phase.

Group Type OTHER

Implementation of the MOHR assessment in primary care workflow

Intervention Type OTHER

The MOHR assessment includes (1) asking patients to complete the MOHR assessment on the web prior to encounters (available at www.MyOwnHealthReport.org it addresses10 distinct health behaviors and psychosocial issues including physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, drug use, sleep, stress, depression and anxiety), (2) provision, via the tool, immediate patient feedback that includes identification of unhealthy issues, assessment of readiness to change, prioritization of issues to change, and preparation for goal-setting and action planning, (3) feedback to the primary care team on the patient status and priorities for change, (4) provision of counseling, goal setting, and referrals to local resources by clinicians during the subsequent office visit, and (5) follow-up with the clinicians and local resources as agreed upon by the patient and clinician.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation of the MOHR assessment in primary care workflow

The MOHR assessment includes (1) asking patients to complete the MOHR assessment on the web prior to encounters (available at www.MyOwnHealthReport.org it addresses10 distinct health behaviors and psychosocial issues including physical activity, diet, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, drug use, sleep, stress, depression and anxiety), (2) provision, via the tool, immediate patient feedback that includes identification of unhealthy issues, assessment of readiness to change, prioritization of issues to change, and preparation for goal-setting and action planning, (3) feedback to the primary care team on the patient status and priorities for change, (4) provision of counseling, goal setting, and referrals to local resources by clinicians during the subsequent office visit, and (5) follow-up with the clinicians and local resources as agreed upon by the patient and clinician.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all adult patients presenting for chronic or wellness care at the study practices

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute illness
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Virginia Commonwealth University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alex H Krist, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Virginia Commonwealth University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA Fielding School of Public Health

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

OCHIN

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M Health Sciences Center School of Rural Public Health

College Station, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Texas School of Public Health

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Vermont College of Medicine

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Carilion Health System

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Estabrooks PA, Boyle M, Emmons KM, Glasgow RE, Hesse BW, Kaplan RM, Krist AH, Moser RP, Taylor MV. Harmonized patient-reported data elements in the electronic health record: supporting meaningful use by primary care action on health behaviors and key psychosocial factors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):575-82. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000576. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22511015 (View on PubMed)

Krist AH, Glasgow RE, Heurtin-Roberts S, Sabo RT, Roby DH, Gorin SN, Balasubramanian BA, Estabrooks PA, Ory MG, Glenn BA, Phillips SM, Kessler R, Johnson SB, Rohweder CL, Fernandez ME; MOHR Study Group. The impact of behavioral and mental health risk assessments on goal setting in primary care. Transl Behav Med. 2016 Jun;6(2):212-9. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0384-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27356991 (View on PubMed)

Krist AH, Phillips SM, Sabo RT, Balasubramanian BA, Heurtin-Roberts S, Ory MG, Johnson SB, Sheinfeld-Gorin SN, Estabrooks PA, Ritzwoller DP, Glasgow RE; MOHR Study Group. Adoption, reach, implementation, and maintenance of a behavioral and mental health assessment in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):525-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.1710.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25384814 (View on PubMed)

Phillips SM, Glasgow RE, Bello G, Ory MG, Glenn BA, Sheinfeld-Gorin SN, Sabo RT, Heurtin-Roberts S, Johnson SB, Krist AH; MOHR Study Group. Frequency and prioritization of patient health risks from a structured health risk assessment. Ann Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;12(6):505-13. doi: 10.1370/afm.1717.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25384812 (View on PubMed)

Krist AH, Glenn BA, Glasgow RE, Balasubramanian BA, Chambers DA, Fernandez ME, Heurtin-Roberts S, Kessler R, Ory MG, Phillips SM, Ritzwoller DP, Roby DH, Rodriguez HP, Sabo RT, Sheinfeld Gorin SN, Stange KC; MOHR Study Group. Designing a valid randomized pragmatic primary care implementation trial: the my own health report (MOHR) project. Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 25;8:73. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-73.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23799943 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.gem-beta.org

Grid Enabled Measures Database used to help collect health behavior and psychosocial measures to consider for inclusion on the MOHR assessment

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U58DP002759-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

R01CA140959

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

VCUFM0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

My Life, My Healthcare
NCT03017196 COMPLETED NA
MOWI Qualitative Assessment
NCT03041831 COMPLETED