A Trial of Three Types of Enemas Used to Treat Functional Constipation in Children

NCT ID: NCT01823848

Last Updated: 2023-11-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Functional constipation is extremely common in children and is defined as painful, hard stools or firm stools for twice or less per week. Functional constipation accounts for 3% of general pediatric visits and up to 25% of pediatric gastroenterology visits. Constipation and fecal impaction can lead to a range of symptoms including decreased appetite, vomiting, and abdominal pain frequently resulting in Emergency Department (ED) presentation. In contrast to the outpatient setting where diet and oral medications work well to relieve symptoms related to functional constipation, ED management requires an approach with quicker results. For immediate relief of symptoms, disimpaction via enema use may be better than polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 for children. However, the type of enema to be used is not well studied. Currently, any patient presenting to the ED with a presumed diagnosis of abdominal pain due to functional constipation receives an oral dose of PEG and one of the following three types of enemas (based on the ED treating attending's discretion): phosphate or Fleets enema, normal saline enema, or mineral oil enema. There is no evidence in the literature that demonstrates any difference in the effectiveness of each of these enemas. The investigators propose a randomized control trial of the three types of pediatric enemas readily used in our ED to determine the best approach. There will be three arms within this study: a) PEG plus phosphate enema b) PEG plus normal saline enema and c) PEG plus mineral oil enema. The physicians enrolling patients will not be the treating physicians. The four principal investigators (blinded to the type of enema being used), following appropriate informed consent, will obtain pain scores (Faces Pain Scale - Revised) pre- and post-administration of each of the three treatments listed above in order to determine the best enema to use in children 4-12 years of age. Other outcomes to be analyzed will include the patient's weight pre- and post-administration of the enema, satisfaction ratings on a visual analog scale from the treating physician (who will also be blinded), and parental surveys on the day of administration and 3-5 days following discharge. Data analysis for pain scores will be completed with repeated measures anova. Categorical values will be compared using Chi Square analysis and continuous variables will be compared using parametric statistics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Functional Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sodium phosphate enema

Administration of sodium phosphate (fleets) enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Age 4-5: 33ml per rectum Age 5-12: 66ml per rectum

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sodium phosphate enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Normal saline enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Mineral oil enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Normal saline enema

Administration of normal saline enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Admininstered as 10ml/kg with maximum of 700ml

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sodium phosphate enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Normal saline enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Mineral oil enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Mineral oil enema

Administration of mineral oil enema for functional constipation in children ages 4-12 years Administered as 66ml per rectum

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sodium phosphate enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Normal saline enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Mineral oil enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sodium phosphate enema

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal saline enema

Rectally administered medication to treat constipation

Intervention Type DRUG

Mineral oil enema

Mineral oil enema administered to treat constipation. 66ml per rectum

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fleets enema

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 4-12 years
* Receiving enema in ED for presumed constipation

Exclusion Criteria

* Critically ill patient
* Any history of renal insufficiency, renal disease, or elevated creatinine
* Any history of intestinal anatomic abnormality (i.e. anal stenosis, anal surgery, bowel obstruction, hirschprung's disease)
* An inability to self-report pain
* Presence of gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube
* Any history of gastrointestinal dysmotility
* Inability to read or speak English or Spanish
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ara Festekjian

Assistant Professor of Clinical Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ara Festekjian, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHLA Division of Emergency Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCI-12-00295

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.