Trial Outcomes & Findings for Persistence of Immunogenicity of MenACWY Conjugate Vaccine 5 Years After Childhood Vaccination, and Immune Response to a Booster Dose (NCT NCT01823536)
NCT ID: NCT01823536
Last Updated: 2014-08-15
Results Overview
The percentages of subjects with persisting serum bactericidal antibody ≥1: 8, against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, after having received one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine, five years earlier in the parent study, are reported. The serum bactericidal antibodies directed against N.meningitidis serogroups, are measured by human complement Serum Bactericidal Assay (hSBA).
COMPLETED
PHASE4
465 participants
5 years post-vaccination
2014-08-15
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from 22 study sites.
All subjects were included in the trial.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥7-≤10 years of age groups, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
Not Assigned
Two subjects 2-5 years of age were randomized to receive another meningococcal ACWY vaccine (not the investigational product in the extension study) in the parent study and therefore not eligible for enrolment into the extension study. These subjects were inadvertently enrolled and completed the extension study. During analysis, these two subjects were included in a separate "not assigned" group in the Full Analysis Set and excluded from the Per Protocol Set. However, one of these subjects actually received the investigational vaccine (due to a randomization error) in the parent study and was included in the safety analyses under MenACWY-CRM\_1 (≥7-≤10 Years) group in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
73
|
103
|
120
|
66
|
101
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
71
|
101
|
119
|
64
|
99
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥7-≤10 years of age groups, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
Not Assigned
Two subjects 2-5 years of age were randomized to receive another meningococcal ACWY vaccine (not the investigational product in the extension study) in the parent study and therefore not eligible for enrolment into the extension study. These subjects were inadvertently enrolled and completed the extension study. During analysis, these two subjects were included in a separate "not assigned" group in the Full Analysis Set and excluded from the Per Protocol Set. However, one of these subjects actually received the investigational vaccine (due to a randomization error) in the parent study and was included in the safety analyses under MenACWY-CRM\_1 (≥7-≤10 Years) group in the extension study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Visit 1 delayed, unable to reschedule
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Met exclusion criterion No 6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Subject moved out of the state
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Persistence of Immunogenicity of MenACWY Conjugate Vaccine 5 Years After Childhood Vaccination, and Immune Response to a Booster Dose
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=73 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=103 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=120 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥7-≤10 years of age groups, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=66 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=101 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
Not Assigned
n=2 Participants
Two subjects 2-5 years of age were randomized to receive another meningococcal ACWY vaccine (not the investigational product in the extension study) in the parent study and therefore not eligible for enrolment into the extension study. These subjects were inadvertently enrolled and completed the extension study. During analysis, these two subjects were included in a separate "not assigned" group in the FAS and excluded from the PPS. However, one of these subjects actually received the investigational vaccine (due to a randomization error) in the parent study and was included in the safety analyses under MenACWY-CRM\_1 (≥7-≤10 Years) group in the extension study.
|
Total
n=465 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
8.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=7 Participants
|
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=4 Participants
|
11.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=21 Participants
|
8.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=8 Participants
|
9.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
222 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
57 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
243 Participants
n=8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 years post-vaccinationPopulation: The analysis was done on per-protocol population i.e all subjects who provided immunogenicity data; had no major protocol deviations and who were not excluded due to other reasons defined prior to analysis.
The percentages of subjects with persisting serum bactericidal antibody ≥1: 8, against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, after having received one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine, five years earlier in the parent study, are reported. The serum bactericidal antibodies directed against N.meningitidis serogroups, are measured by human complement Serum Bactericidal Assay (hSBA).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=70 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=96 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=64 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against Neisseria Meningitidis (N. Meningitidis) Serogroups A, C, W and Y, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine
Serogroup C (N= 69, 96, 64)
|
48 Percentages of subjects
Interval 36.0 to 60.0
|
32 Percentages of subjects
Interval 23.0 to 43.0
|
56 Percentages of subjects
Interval 43.0 to 69.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against Neisseria Meningitidis (N. Meningitidis) Serogroups A, C, W and Y, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine
Serogroup A (N=68, 96, 64)
|
7 Percentages of subjects
Interval 2.0 to 16.0
|
14 Percentages of subjects
Interval 7.0 to 22.0
|
22 Percentages of subjects
Interval 13.0 to 34.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against Neisseria Meningitidis (N. Meningitidis) Serogroups A, C, W and Y, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine
Serogroup W (N= 69, 96, 64)
|
83 Percentages of subjects
Interval 72.0 to 91.0
|
74 Percentages of subjects
Interval 64.0 to 82.0
|
80 Percentages of subjects
Interval 68.0 to 89.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against Neisseria Meningitidis (N. Meningitidis) Serogroups A, C, W and Y, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine
Serogroup Y
|
50 Percentages of subjects
Interval 38.0 to 62.0
|
48 Percentages of subjects
Interval 38.0 to 58.0
|
53 Percentages of subjects
Interval 40.0 to 66.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 years post-vaccinationPopulation: The analysis was done on per-protocol population.
The persistence of geometric mean titers (GMTs) against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y in subjects who had received one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine, five years earlier in the parent study, are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=70 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=96 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=64 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Persisting Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y in Subjects, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine.
Serogroup A (N=68, 96, 64)
|
2.41 Titers
Interval 2.09 to 2.78
|
2.95 Titers
Interval 2.42 to 3.61
|
3.73 Titers
Interval 2.74 to 5.06
|
—
|
—
|
|
Persisting Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y in Subjects, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine.
Serogroup C (N= 69, 96, 64)
|
7.55 Titers
Interval 5.44 to 10.0
|
6.5 Titers
Interval 4.75 to 8.9
|
12 Titers
Interval 7.72 to 19.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Persisting Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y in Subjects, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine.
Serogroup W (N= 69, 96, 64)
|
23 Titers
Interval 17.0 to 31.0
|
19 Titers
Interval 14.0 to 25.0
|
26 Titers
Interval 18.0 to 38.0
|
—
|
—
|
|
Persisting Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y in Subjects, Five Years After Having Received One or Two Doses of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine.
Serogroup Y
|
8.57 Titers
Interval 6.08 to 12.0
|
8.13 Titers
Interval 6.11 to 11.0
|
10 Titers
Interval 6.51 to 16.0
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5 years post-vaccination; baseline for naivePopulation: The analysis was done on per-protocol population.
The percentages of subjects with persisting serum bactericidal antibody ≥1: 8, against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, after having received one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine five years earlier in the parent study, are compared with the hSBA response in age matched vaccine-naive subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=70 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=96 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=118 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=64 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=100 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y as Compared to Age Matched Vaccine-naive Subjects
Serogroup A (N= 68, 96, 118, 64, 100)
|
7 Percentages of subjects
Interval 2.0 to 16.0
|
14 Percentages of subjects
Interval 7.0 to 22.0
|
0 Percentages of subjects
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
22 Percentages of subjects
Interval 13.0 to 34.0
|
5 Percentages of subjects
Interval 2.0 to 11.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y as Compared to Age Matched Vaccine-naive Subjects
Serogroup C (N= 69, 96, 118, 64, 99)
|
48 Percentages of subjects
Interval 36.0 to 60.0
|
32 Percentages of subjects
Interval 23.0 to 43.0
|
21 Percentages of subjects
Interval 14.0 to 30.0
|
56 Percentages of subjects
Interval 43.0 to 69.0
|
21 Percentages of subjects
Interval 14.0 to 31.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y as Compared to Age Matched Vaccine-naive Subjects
Serogroup W (N= 69, 96, 118, 64, 100)
|
83 Percentages of subjects
Interval 72.0 to 91.0
|
74 Percentages of subjects
Interval 64.0 to 82.0
|
52 Percentages of subjects
Interval 42.0 to 61.0
|
80 Percentages of subjects
Interval 68.0 to 89.0
|
54 Percentages of subjects
Interval 44.0 to 64.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With Persisting hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y as Compared to Age Matched Vaccine-naive Subjects
Serogroup Y
|
50 Percentages of subjects
Interval 38.0 to 62.0
|
48 Percentages of subjects
Interval 38.0 to 58.0
|
23 Percentages of subjects
Interval 16.0 to 32.0
|
53 Percentages of subjects
Interval 40.0 to 66.0
|
37 Percentages of subjects
Interval 28.0 to 47.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 28 post-vaccinationPopulation: The analysis was done on per-protocol population.
The antibody response against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, at one month after one injection of Men ACWY-CRM vaccine was administered in the present study to subjects who had received either one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine 5 years earlier and to age matched naive subjects, is evaluated in terms of the percentages of subjects with hSBA titers ≥1:8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=65 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=95 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=110 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=60 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=85 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentages of Subjects With hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup A (N= 63, 95, 109, 60, 85)
|
98 Percentages of subjects
Interval 91.0 to 100.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 96.0 to 100.0
|
75 Percentages of subjects
Interval 66.0 to 83.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
80 Percentages of subjects
Interval 70.0 to 88.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup C (N= 65, 94, 109, 60, 85)
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 96.0 to 100.0
|
82 Percentages of subjects
Interval 73.0 to 88.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
86 Percentages of subjects
Interval 77.0 to 92.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup W (N= 63, 95, 110, 60, 85)
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 96.0 to 100.0
|
94 Percentages of subjects
Interval 87.0 to 97.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
92 Percentages of subjects
Interval 84.0 to 97.0
|
|
Percentages of Subjects With hSBA Titers ≥1:8 Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup Y (N= 65, 94, 110, 59, 85)
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 96.0 to 100.0
|
85 Percentages of subjects
Interval 77.0 to 91.0
|
100 Percentages of subjects
Interval 94.0 to 100.0
|
82 Percentages of subjects
Interval 73.0 to 90.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 28 post-vaccinationPopulation: The analysis was done on per-protocol population.
The antibody response against N.meningitidis serogroups A, C, W and Y, at one month after one injection of Men ACWY-CRM vaccine was administered in the present study to subjects who had received either one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine 5 years earlier and to age matched naive subjects, is evaluated in terms of GMTs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=65 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=95 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=110 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=60 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=85 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup A (N= 63, 95, 109, 60, 85)
|
321 Titers
Interval 241.0 to 428.0
|
361 Titers
Interval 299.0 to 436.0
|
28 Titers
Interval 20.0 to 39.0
|
350 Titers
Interval 265.0 to 463.0
|
31 Titers
Interval 22.0 to 45.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup C (N= 65, 94, 109, 60, 85)
|
760 Titers
Interval 545.0 to 1059.0
|
498 Titers
Interval 406.0 to 610.0
|
48 Titers
Interval 33.0 to 70.0
|
712 Titers
Interval 490.0 to 1036.0
|
102 Titers
Interval 63.0 to 166.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup W (N= 63, 95, 110, 60, 85)
|
1571 Titers
Interval 1247.0 to 1980.0
|
1534 Titers
Interval 1255.0 to 1873.0
|
55 Titers
Interval 42.0 to 72.0
|
1556 Titers
Interval 1083.0 to 2237.0
|
69 Titers
Interval 48.0 to 99.0
|
|
Geometric Mean Titers Against N.Meningitidis Serogroups A, C, W and Y, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Serogroup Y (N= 65, 94, 110, 59, 85)
|
1286 Titers
Interval 992.0 to 1668.0
|
1693 Titers
Interval 1360.0 to 2107.0
|
48 Titers
Interval 34.0 to 66.0
|
1442 Titers
Interval 1050.0 to 1979.0
|
45 Titers
Interval 30.0 to 69.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 7 post-vaccinationPopulation: The analysis was done on solicited safety set, ie, all subjects in the exposed set who provided post vaccination solicited reactogenicity data.
The number of subjects reporting solicited local and systemic adverse events after one injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine was administered in the present study to, 1. Subjects, who had 5 years earlier received either one or two doses of MenACWY-CRM vaccine 2. Vaccine-naive subjects.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=69 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=100 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=119 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=64 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=98 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Injection site erythema (N= 68, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
10 Number of subjects
|
13 Number of subjects
|
10 Number of subjects
|
10 Number of subjects
|
6 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Injection site induration (N= 68, 99, 119, 64, 98)
|
12 Number of subjects
|
12 Number of subjects
|
7 Number of subjects
|
7 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Chills (N= 68, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
5 Number of subjects
|
3 Number of subjects
|
6 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
2 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Malaise (N= 69, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
15 Number of subjects
|
14 Number of subjects
|
13 Number of subjects
|
11 Number of subjects
|
19 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Myalgia (N= 69, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
9 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
4 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Arthralgia (N= 69, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
8 Number of subjects
|
4 Number of subjects
|
5 Number of subjects
|
4 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Headache (N= 69, 99, 117, 64, 97)
|
13 Number of subjects
|
9 Number of subjects
|
22 Number of subjects
|
12 Number of subjects
|
21 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Nausea (N= 68, 99, 117, 64, 97)
|
10 Number of subjects
|
11 Number of subjects
|
12 Number of subjects
|
7 Number of subjects
|
8 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Fever (≥38°C; N= 66, 99, 115, 64, 96)
|
1 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
3 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Prophyl. use analg/antip (N= 68, 99, 118, 63, 97)
|
0 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
2 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Thera. use anal/antipyret (N= 69, 99, 118, 64, 97)
|
14 Number of subjects
|
12 Number of subjects
|
11 Number of subjects
|
11 Number of subjects
|
6 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Injection site pain (N= 68, 99, 117, 64, 98)
|
39 Number of subjects
|
52 Number of subjects
|
42 Number of subjects
|
31 Number of subjects
|
47 Number of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1 to day 28Population: The analysis was done on unsolicited safety set, ie, all exposed subjects who provided unsolicited adverse events (AE) data.
The safety and tolerability of one injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine, administered in the present study, was evaluated in terms of the number of subjects reporting unsolicited adverse events, serious adverse events and adverse events leading to premature withdrawal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=73 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=102 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=120 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=65 Participants
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=100 Participants
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Any adverse event (AE)
|
18 Number of subjects
|
23 Number of subjects
|
19 Number of subjects
|
18 Number of subjects
|
11 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Possibly/Probably related unsolicited AE
|
4 Number of subjects
|
3 Number of subjects
|
4 Number of subjects
|
7 Number of subjects
|
5 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Any SAE
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
1 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Possibly/Probably related SAE
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
AE leading to withdrawal
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
|
Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events, After Receiving One Injection of MenACWY-CRM Vaccine in the Present Study.
Death
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
0 Number of subjects
|
Adverse Events
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=73 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=102 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=120 participants at risk
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥7-≤10 years of age groups, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=65 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=100 participants at risk
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.83%
1/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
0.00%
0/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
1.0%
1/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
MenACWY-CRM_2 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=73 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 2 injections of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=102 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 2-5 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 7-10 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥7-≤10 Years)
n=120 participants at risk
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥7-≤10 years of age groups, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
MenACWY-CRM_1 (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=65 participants at risk
Subjects who had previously received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 6-10 years of age, were administered 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine at 11-15 years of age.
|
Vaccine Naive (≥11-≤15 Years)
n=100 participants at risk
Vaccine naive subjects, age-matched to the ≥11-≤15 years of age group, received 1 injection of MenACWY-CRM vaccine.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
16.4%
12/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
11.8%
12/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
11.7%
14/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
12.3%
8/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
9.0%
9/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
6.8%
5/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
2.9%
3/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
5.0%
6/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
3.1%
2/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
2.0%
2/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
34.2%
25/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
33.3%
34/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
23.3%
28/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
26.2%
17/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
21.0%
21/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
28.8%
21/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
25.5%
26/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
21.7%
26/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
26.2%
17/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
17.0%
17/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
57.5%
42/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
55.9%
57/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
42.5%
51/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
52.3%
34/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
52.0%
52/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
20.5%
15/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
13.7%
14/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
10.8%
13/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
18.5%
12/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
19.0%
19/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
11.0%
8/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
4.9%
5/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
4.2%
5/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
6.2%
4/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
9.0%
9/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
13.7%
10/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
12.7%
13/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
8.3%
10/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
6.2%
4/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
9.0%
9/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
19.2%
14/73 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
10.8%
11/102 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
19.2%
23/120 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
23.1%
15/65 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
23.0%
23/100 • All solicited AE were collected from day 1 to day 7; unsolicited AEs, AE's leading to premature withdrawal and all Serious Adverse Events were collected throughout the study (day1 to day 28).
All solicited AEs are reported as systematic assessment ; all unsolicited AEs are reported as non-systematic assessment. Serious adverse events analysis was done on the unsolicited safety set, other adverse events analysis was done on the overall safety set.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER