Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy in Subjects With Fibromyalgia (NCT NCT01820585)
NCT ID: NCT01820585
Last Updated: 2013-07-19
Results Overview
The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain. Pain intensity was assessed on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain and was recorded in a subject's diary. The subject was instructed to complete the assessment daily on awakening.Primary analyses were conducted on the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all randomised subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and with at least 1 post-randomisation rating of 24-h-average pain. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain recorded in a subject's diary upon awakening each morning. An ANCOVA on the FAS revealed no statistically significant differences between the 3 ESL groups and the placebo group after 13 weeks of treatment.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
528 participants
Baseline and 13 Weeks
2013-07-19
Participant Flow
Subjects were screened in 84 centres in 16 European countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Ukraine and United Kingdom). Study initiation date: 21 Apr 2009 Study completion date: 03 Sep 2010;
After completing procedures at V1, subjects returned to the study centre for V2. At V2, subjects, who had completed at least 4 subject diary pain assessments satisfactorily within the past 7 days, had an average pain score that was ≥4 and ≤9 and continued to meet all study entry criteria, were randomly assigned to 1 of the 4 treatment groups.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo tablets matching the 400-mg and 600-mg tablets were administered Once daily (QD) by oral route.
|
ESL 400 mg
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 400 mg : ESL was supplied in 400-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route.
|
ESL 800 mg
ESL 800 mg : ESL was supplied in 400-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route
|
ESL 1200 mg
ESL was supplied in 400-mg and 600-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
131
|
130
|
135
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized and Treated
|
131
|
130
|
135
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
131
|
130
|
135
|
129
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Titration Period
|
128
|
125
|
131
|
126
|
|
Overall Study
Entered Maintenance Period
|
128
|
124
|
131
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Maintenance Period
|
105
|
98
|
101
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
104
|
98
|
101
|
83
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
32
|
34
|
49
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Placebo tablets matching the 400-mg and 600-mg tablets were administered Once daily (QD) by oral route.
|
ESL 400 mg
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) 400 mg : ESL was supplied in 400-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route.
|
ESL 800 mg
ESL 800 mg : ESL was supplied in 400-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route
|
ESL 1200 mg
ESL was supplied in 400-mg and 600-mg tablets and was administered QD by oral route.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
9
|
13
|
23
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
9
|
7
|
5
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Subject non-compliance
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
at sponsor request
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy in Subjects With Fibromyalgia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 Participants
Tablets
Placebo : Tablets
|
ESL 400 mg
n=130 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 400 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 800 mg
n=135 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 800 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 1200 mg
n=132 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 1200 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
Total
n=528 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<=65 Years
|
126 participants
n=5 Participants
|
126 participants
n=7 Participants
|
132 participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 participants
n=4 Participants
|
511 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>65 years
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
114 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
487 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 13 WeeksThe primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain. Pain intensity was assessed on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst possible pain and was recorded in a subject's diary. The subject was instructed to complete the assessment daily on awakening.Primary analyses were conducted on the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all randomised subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication and with at least 1 post-randomisation rating of 24-h-average pain. The primary efficacy variable was the absolute change from baseline to endpoint in mean pain recorded in a subject's diary upon awakening each morning. An ANCOVA on the FAS revealed no statistically significant differences between the 3 ESL groups and the placebo group after 13 weeks of treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=130 Participants
Tablets
Placebo : Tablets
|
ESL 400 mg
n=130 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 400 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 800 mg
n=135 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 800 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 1200 mg
n=129 Participants
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 1200 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain
|
-1.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1735
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1731
|
-1.2 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1704
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1734
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
ESL 400 mg
ESL 800 mg
ESL 1200 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 participants at risk
Tablets
Placebo : Tablets
|
ESL 400 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 400 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 800 mg
n=135 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 800 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 1200 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 1200 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Abortion induced
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer in situ
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.76%
1/132 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incisional hernia
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple injuries
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/130 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/135 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.00%
0/132 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=131 participants at risk
Tablets
Placebo : Tablets
|
ESL 400 mg
n=130 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 400 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 800 mg
n=135 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 800 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
ESL 1200 mg
n=132 participants at risk
Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
ESL 1200 mg : Eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA 2-093) tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.2%
16/131 • Number of events 16 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
13.8%
18/130 • Number of events 18 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
14.1%
19/135 • Number of events 19 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
18.9%
25/132 • Number of events 25 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
7.6%
10/131 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
7.7%
10/130 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
12.6%
17/135 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
15.9%
21/132 • Number of events 21 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
4.6%
6/131 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.4%
7/130 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.2%
7/135 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
11.4%
15/132 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
3.8%
5/131 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.8%
5/130 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.2%
7/135 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
8.3%
11/132 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyl transferase increased
|
0.00%
0/131 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.9%
8/135 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
7.6%
10/132 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.7%
5/135 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
6.8%
9/132 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.8%
5/130 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/135 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
6.8%
9/132 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.8%
5/130 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
10.4%
14/135 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
6.1%
8/132 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.9%
8/135 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
6.1%
8/132 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.3%
7/131 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.7%
5/135 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
6.1%
8/132 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
5.3%
7/132 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.4%
6/135 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.8%
5/132 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/135 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.8%
5/132 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/135 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/132 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fibromyalgia
|
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/132 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.5%
2/131 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
4.6%
6/130 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/132 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/130 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/132 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.77%
1/130 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/132 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.7%
5/135 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/132 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/135 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/132 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.1%
4/131 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.74%
1/135 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.3%
3/132 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.76%
1/131 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.1%
4/130 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
2.2%
3/135 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.76%
1/132 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.3%
3/131 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
1.5%
2/130 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
3.0%
4/135 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
0.76%
1/132 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated throughout the study that consisted of a 2-week Baseline Period, a 1-week Titration Period (active treatment or placebo) and a 12- week Maintenance Period (active treatment or placebo).
Safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs)
|
Additional Information
Head of Clinical Research Section
Bial - Portela & Cª, S.A.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER