Trial Outcomes & Findings for Patient Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke (NCT NCT01819506)
NCT ID: NCT01819506
Last Updated: 2019-08-08
Results Overview
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a stroke rehabilitation assessment of arm/hand movement impairment. It is traditionally scored by assigning 30 items assessing voluntary arm/hand movements and 3 items assessing reflexes an ordinal rating (0=unable, 1=partial, 2=near normal), then summing the ratings to obtain a general statement of ability. Instead of this traditional scoring method, the investigators will eliminate the reflex items, thus reporting the aggregate score possible from 0/60 to 60/60 points. Higher scores indicate greater levels of arm movement ability.
COMPLETED
NA
103 participants
participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.
2019-08-08
Participant Flow
Recruited from a University Stroke Rehabilitation Research Registry.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
MATCH
MATCH is defined as a task-practice occupational therapy program targeting patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care
Usual Care is defined as a non-targeted task practice standard of care occupational therapy program consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
51
|
52
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
43
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
MATCH
MATCH is defined as a task-practice occupational therapy program targeting patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care
Usual Care is defined as a non-targeted task practice standard of care occupational therapy program consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
5
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Patient Targeted Upper Extremity Rehabilitation After Stroke
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
n=51 Participants
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
n=52 Participants
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Total
n=103 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=5 Participants
|
57.58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.09 • n=7 Participants
|
55.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.83 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) is a stroke rehabilitation assessment of arm/hand movement impairment. It is traditionally scored by assigning 30 items assessing voluntary arm/hand movements and 3 items assessing reflexes an ordinal rating (0=unable, 1=partial, 2=near normal), then summing the ratings to obtain a general statement of ability. Instead of this traditional scoring method, the investigators will eliminate the reflex items, thus reporting the aggregate score possible from 0/60 to 60/60 points. Higher scores indicate greater levels of arm movement ability.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
n=51 Participants
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
n=52 Participants
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity
|
4.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.39
|
2.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.34
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.The Wolf Motor Function Test is an assessment of arm movement function. Subjects are timed (seconds) as they complete 15 functional movements with the paretic arm. The average time required to complete an item is reported in seconds so that lower scores (quicker completion times) indicate greater functional movement skills. Post-intervention averages were compared to baseline averages so a reduction in timed averages indicates improved movement function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
n=51 Participants
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
n=52 Participants
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Wolf Motor Function Test
|
-4.81 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.40
|
-6.51 seconds
Standard Deviation 18.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: participants will be followed for the duration of the 4-week rehabilitation treatment, an expected average of 4 weeks.Population: Complete and accurate data for this measure is no longer available.
sEMG analysis is an objective method to study muscle coordination during functional arm movements. Subjects will be fitted with sensors on the skin placed over 8 arm/shoulder muscles on both arms. The sensors will detect the muscle activity of these muscles during functional reaching movements. sEMG data will be recorded with a 16-channel wireless Motion Labs EMG system and processed with custom ORBIS software.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
n=51 participants at risk
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
n=52 participants at risk
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
subsequent stroke
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
MATCH Targeted Task Practice
n=51 participants at risk
Targeted task practice is defined as a therapy program aimed at patient-specific upper extremity motor impairment levels and systematically progressed to assure an ongoing "just right" match between task-difficulty and patient-ability.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
Usual Care: Non-Targeted Task Practice
n=52 participants at risk
Non-targeted task practice is a standard of care treatment consisting of task practice with no guidance from the measurement framework to systematically address specific upper extremity motor impairment levels or progress rehabilitation therapy.
Task Practice Physical Rehabilitation Therapy: Similar to stroke rehabilitation occupational therapy.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Fall
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
0.00%
0/52 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
sick
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
0.00%
0/52 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
vertigo
|
0.00%
0/51 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
cardiac problems
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
0.00%
0/52 • An expected average of 4 weeks
All-cause Mortality was not monitored/addressed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place