Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Pilot Study of Interventricular Septal Puncture for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Treat Heart Failure (NCT NCT01818765)
NCT ID: NCT01818765
Last Updated: 2020-03-03
Results Overview
Acute: coronary arterial damage; tamponade or effusion; acute lead displacement; peri-procedural systemic thromboembolism; arrhythmia; bleeding Chronic: systemic thromboembolism; lead displacement, dysfunction or fracture; system infection; bleeding; arrhythmia; death
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
6 months
2020-03-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Procedure
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV (left ventricular) lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT (cardiac resynchronisation therapy) .
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Procedure
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV (left ventricular) lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT (cardiac resynchronisation therapy) .
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Pilot Study of Interventricular Septal Puncture for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to Treat Heart Failure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Procedure
n=20 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Electrocardiogram QRS segment duration
|
157 ms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=5 Participants
|
|
ischaemic aetiology
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ejection fraction
|
28 % (of blood ejected from left ventricle)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsAcute: coronary arterial damage; tamponade or effusion; acute lead displacement; peri-procedural systemic thromboembolism; arrhythmia; bleeding Chronic: systemic thromboembolism; lead displacement, dysfunction or fracture; system infection; bleeding; arrhythmia; death
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=20 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Free of Adverse Effects at 6 Months Post Procedure
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsAbility to successfully deliver LV endocardial pacing via the ventricular transseptal approach (procedure success rate)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=20 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Procedural Success - Number of Participants With Successful Delivery of Left Ventricular Lead Via Ventricular Transseptal Approach
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: Those patients who attended follow-up at six months were analysed
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class by \>=1 NYHA functional class is a very widely used measure of symptoms in heart failure. Improvement is considered to be a decrease in class, representing improve symptoms Class Patient Symptoms I No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). II Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). III Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=18 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
NYHA Class
|
9 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: Those patients who attended follow-up at six months and completed the questionnaires were analysed
Change in quality of life as measured using the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol five dimension, five level score ) tool (\>1 point decrease) The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number from 1 to 5 that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. Increase in score for each dimension represent worsening of symptoms/ problems
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=16 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With >1 Point Improvement in EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Score
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsChange in 6 minute walk distance; ≥10% increase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=16 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With ≥10% Increase in 6-minute Walk Distance
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: Those patients who attended follow-up at six months and had an echocardiogram with interpretable data were analysed
Change in echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function ejection fraction was measured using two-dimensional echocardiography and the Simpson method at baseline and six months
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=16 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Echocardiographic Response: Change in Ejection Fraction as Measured by Echocardiography From Baseline to 6 Months
|
41 % cardiac ejection fraction
Standard Deviation 9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 monthsPopulation: Those patients who attended follow-up at six months and had both baseline and six month BNP results available were analysed
Change in BNP (b-type natriuretic peptide) levels BNP levels were measured from a standard blood draw at baseline and six months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=13 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Biochemical Response: Change in BNP (B-type Natriuretic Peptide) Levels Between Baseline and Six Months
|
95 pmol/L
Standard Deviation 129
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Those patients who had follow-up available for any time period more than three months were included
Systemic thrombosis at 2 years
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Procedure
n=18 Participants
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Outcomes
|
3 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Procedure
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Procedure
n=20 participants at risk;n=18 participants at risk
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Stroke or transient ischaemic attack
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 3
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Procedure
n=20 participants at risk;n=18 participants at risk
20 patients were recruited, 15 with failed transvenous LV lead placement and 5 non-responders to CRT.
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
wound haematoma, requiring early re-operation
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2
|
Additional Information
Dr James Gamble
Oxford university hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place